On the Fairness of Normalized p-Means for Allocating Goods and Chores (2402.14996v1)
Abstract: Allocating items in a fair and economically efficient manner is a central problem in fair division. We study this problem for agents with additive preferences, when items are all goods or all chores, divisible or indivisible. The celebrated notion of Nash welfare is known to produce fair and efficient allocations for both divisible and indivisible goods; there is no known analogue for dividing chores. The Nash welfare objective belongs to a large, parameterized family of objectives called the p-mean welfare functions, which includes other notable members, like social welfare and egalitarian welfare. However, among the members of this family, only the Nash welfare produces fair allocations for goods. Incidentally, Nash welfare is also the only member that satisfies the axiom of scale invariance, which is crucially associated with its fairness properties. We define the class of "normalized p-mean" objectives, which imparts the missing key axiom of scale invariance to the p-mean family. Our results show that optimizing the normalized p-mean objectives produces fair and efficient allocations when the items are goods or chores, divisible or indivisible. For instance, the normalized p-means gives us an infinite class of objectives that produce (i) proportional and Pareto efficient allocations for divisible goods, (ii) approximately proportional and Pareto efficient allocations for divisible chores, (iii) EF1 and Pareto efficient allocations for indivisible goods for two agents, and (iv) EF1 and Pareto efficient allocations for indivisible chores for two agents.
- Strategyproof approximation of the minimax on networks. Mathematics of Operations Research, 35(3):513–526, 2010.
- Handbook of mathematical economics, volume 1. North-Holland Amsterdam, 1981.
- Matching markets: Theory and practice. Advances in Economics and Econometrics, 1:3–47, 2013.
- Haris Aziz. Justifications of welfare guarantees under normalized utilities. ACM SIGecom Exchanges, 17(2):71–75, 2020.
- Tight approximation algorithms for p-mean welfare under subadditive valuations. In 28th Annual European Symposium on Algorithms (ESA 2020), volume 173, page 11. Schloss Dagstuhl–Leibniz-Zentrum f {{\{{\\\backslash\" u}}\}} r Informatik, 2020.
- Handbook of computational social choice. Cambridge University Press, 2016.
- On the proximity of markets with integral equilibria. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, volume 33, pages 1748–1755, 2019.
- Universal and tight online algorithms for generalized-mean welfare. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, volume 36, pages 4793–4800, 2022.
- Competitive division of a mixed manna. Econometrica, 85(6):1847–1871, 2017.
- Fair chore division under binary supermodular costs. In Proceedings of the 2023 International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, pages 2863–2865, 2023.
- Uniform welfare guarantees under identical subadditive valuations. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth International Conference on International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence, pages 46–52, 2021.
- Algorithms for competitive division of chores. Mathematics of Operations Research, 2023.
- On approximate envy-freeness for indivisible chores and mixed resources. Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques, 2021.
- Truthful and fair mechanisms for matroid-rank valuations. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, volume 36, pages 4801–4808, 2022.
- Fair public decision making. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Economics and Computation, pages 629–646, 2017.
- Fair and efficient allocations under subadditive valuations. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, volume 35, pages 5269–5276, 2021.
- The unreasonable fairness of maximum nash welfare. ACM Transactions on Economics and Computation (TEAC), 7(3):1–32, 2019.
- Edward H Clarke. Multipart pricing of public goods. Public choice, pages 17–33, 1971.
- Consensus of subjective probabilities: The pari-mutuel method. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 30(1):165–168, 1959.
- How to fairly allocate easy and difficult chores. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, pages 372–380, 2022.
- Duncan Karl Foley. Resource allocation and the public sector. Yale University, 1966.
- Tractable fragments of the maximum nash welfare problem. In Web and Internet Economics: 18th International Conference, WINE 2022, Troy, NY, USA, December 12–15, 2022, Proceedings, volume 13778, page 362. Springer Nature, 2022.
- Optimization and approximation in deterministic sequencing and scheduling: a survey. In Annals of discrete mathematics, volume 5, pages 287–326. Elsevier, 1979.
- Fair and efficient allocations of chores under bivalued preferences. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, volume 36, pages 5043–5050, 2022.
- New algorithms for the fair and efficient allocation of indivisible chores. In Proceedings of the Thirty-Second International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI-23, pages 2710–2718, 2023.
- On approximately fair allocations of indivisible goods. In Proceedings of the 5th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, pages 125–131, 2004.
- Microeconomic theory, volume 1. Oxford university press New York, 1995.
- John F Nash Jr. The bargaining problem. Econometrica: Journal of the econometric society, pages 155–162, 1950.
- Almost envy-freeness with general valuations. SIAM Journal on Discrete Mathematics, 34(2):1039–1068, 2020.
- Hugo Steinhaus. The problem of fair division. Econometrica, 16:101–104, 1948.
- Hal R Varian. Equity, envy, and efficiency. Journal of Economic Theory, 9(1):63–91, 1974.
- William Vickrey. Counterspeculation, auctions, and competitive sealed tenders. The Journal of finance, 16(1):8–37, 1961.
- A general framework for fair allocation under matroid rank valuations. In Proceedings of the 24th ACM Conference on Economics and Computation, pages 1129–1152, 2023.
- Extending the characterization of maximum nash welfare. Economics Letters, 224:111030, 2023.