Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
158 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Optimal transmission expansion minimally reduces decarbonization costs of U.S. electricity (2402.14189v1)

Published 22 Feb 2024 in econ.GN, cs.SY, eess.SY, and q-fin.EC

Abstract: Solar and wind power are cost-competitive with fossil fuels, yet their intermittent nature presents challenges. Significant temporal and geographic differences in land, wind, and solar resources suggest that long-distance transmission could be particularly beneficial. Using a detailed, open-source model, we analyze optimal transmission expansion jointly with storage, generation, and hourly operations across the three primary interconnects in the United States. Transmission expansion offers far more benefits in a high-renewable system than in a system with mostly conventional generation. Yet while an optimal nationwide plan would have more than triple current interregional transmission, transmission decreases the cost of a 100% clean system by only 4% compared to a plan that relies solely on current transmission. Expanding capacity only within existing interconnects can achieve most of these savings. Adjustments to energy storage and generation mix can leverage the current interregional transmission infrastructure to build a clean power system at a reasonable cost.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (36)
  1. Biasotto, Larissa D, and Andreas Kindel. 2018. “Power lines and impacts on biodiversity: A systematic review.” Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 71: 110–119.
  2. Borenstein, Severin, James B Bushnell, and Frank A Wolak. 2002. “Measuring market inefficiencies in California’s restructured wholesale electricity market.” American Economic Review, 92(5): 1376–1405.
  3. Borenstein, Severin, Meredith Fowlie, and James Sallee. 2021. “Designing electricity rates for an equitable energy transition.” Energy Institute Working Paper, 314.
  4. Brown, Patrick R, and Audun Botterud. 2021. “The value of inter-regional coordination and transmission in decarbonizing the US electricity system.” Joule, 5(1): 115–134.
  5. Brown, Tom W, Tobias Bischof-Niemz, Kornelis Blok, Christian Breyer, Henrik Lund, and Brian Vad Mathiesen. 2018. “Response to ‘Burden of proof: A comprehensive review of the feasibility of 100% renewable-electricity systems’.” Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 92: 834–847.
  6. Chojkiewicz, Emilia, Umed Paliwal, Nikit Abhyankar, Casey Baker, Ric O’Connell, Duncan Callaway, and Amol Phadke. 2024. “Accelerating Transmission Expansion by Using Advanced Conductors in Existing Rights-of-Way.” Energy Institute at Haas, University of California at Berkeley, Working Paper Series 343R.
  7. Davis, Lucas, Catherine Hausman, and Nancy L Rose. 2023. “Transmission Impossible? Prospects for Decarbonizing the US Grid.” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 37(4): 155–80.
  8. Decker, Christopher. 2021. “Chapter 5 - Energy transportation: electricity.” In Handbook of Energy Economics and Policy. , ed. Alessandro Rubino, Alessandro Sapio and Massimo La Scala, 193–238. Academic Press.
  9. Fripp, Matthias. 2012. “Switch: a planning tool for power systems with large shares of intermittent renewable energy.” Environmental science & technology, 46(11): 6371–6378.
  10. Hausman, Catherine. 2024. “Power Flows: Transmission Lines and Corporate Profits.” National Bureau of Economic Research, , (w32091).
  11. Hidalgo-Gonzalez, Patricia L, Josiah Johnston, and Daniel M Kammen. 2021. “Cost and impact of weak medium term policies in the electricity system in Western North America.” The Electricity Journal, 34(3): 106925.
  12. Howells, Mark, Holger Rogner, Neil Strachan, Charles Heaps, Hillard Huntington, Socrates Kypreos, Alison Hughes, Semida Silveira, Joe DeCarolis, Morgan Bazillian, et al. 2011. “OSeMOSYS: the open source energy modeling system: an introduction to its ethos, structure and development.” Energy Policy, 39(10): 5850–5870.
  13. Hyde, Jacy L, Stephanie A Bohlman, and Denis Valle. 2018. “Transmission lines are an under-acknowledged conservation threat to the Brazilian Amazon.” Biological Conservation, 228: 343–356.
  14. Imelda, Imelda, Matthias Fripp, and Michael J Roberts. 2022. “Real-time pricing and the cost of clean power.” Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies Working Paper.
  15. Jacobson, Mark Z, Mark A Delucchi, Mary A Cameron, and Brian V Mathiesen. 2018. “Matching demand with supply at low cost in 139 countries among 20 world regions with 100% intermittent wind, water, and sunlight (WWS) for all purposes.” Renewable Energy, 123: 236–248.
  16. Jayadev, Gopika, Benjamin D Leibowicz, and Erhan Kutanoglu. 2020. “US electricity infrastructure of the future: Generation and transmission pathways through 2050.” Applied energy, 260: 114267.
  17. Johnston, Josiah, Rodrigo Henriquez-Auba, Benjamín Maluenda, and Matthias Fripp. 2019. “Switch 2.0: A modern platform for planning high-renewable power systems.” SoftwareX, 10: 100251.
  18. Joskow, Paul L. 2020. “Transmission capacity expansion is needed to decarbonize the electricity sector efficiently.” Joule, 4(1): 1–3.
  19. Mai, Trieu, John Bistline, Yinong Sun, Wesley Cole, Cara Marcy, Chris Namovicz, and David Young. 2018. “The role of input assumptions and model structures in projections of variable renewable energy: A multi-model perspective of the US electricity system.” Energy Economics, 76: 313–324.
  20. Marshall, Ross, and Ross Baxter. 2002. “Strategic routeing and environmental impact assessment for overhead electrical transmission lines.” Journal of environmental planning and management, 45(5): 747–764.
  21. Masters, Gilbert M. 2013. Renewable and efficient electric power systems. John Wiley & Sons.
  22. Moch, Jonathan, and Henry Lee. 2022. “The Challenges of Decarbonizing the US Electric Grid by 2035.” Environment and Natural Resources Program Policy Briefs.
  23. Nalley, Stephen, and Angelina LaRose. 2022. “Annual energy outlook 2022 (AEO2022).” Energy Information Agency, 23.
  24. National Renewable Energy Laboratory. 2019. “Electrification Futures Study Load Profiles.” National Renewable Energy Laboratory.
  25. National Renewable Energy Laboratory. 2022. “2022 Annual Technology Baseline.” National Renewable Energy Laboratory.
  26. Pacala, S, C Cunliff, D Deane-Ryan, JH Haggerty, CT Hendrickson, J Jenkins, R Johnson, TC Lieuwen, VE Loftness, CA Miller, et al. 2021. “Accelerating Decarbonization in the United States: Technology, Policy, and Societal Dimensions.” Technical report, National Academy of Sciences.
  27. Patankar, Neha, Xiili Sarkela-Basset, Greg Schivley, Emily Leslie, and Jesse Jenkins. 2023. “Land use trade-offs in decarbonization of electricity generation in the American West.” Energy and Climate Change, 4: 100107.
  28. Pursiheimo, Esa, Hannele Holttinen, and Tiina Koljonen. 2019. “Inter-sectoral effects of high renewable energy share in global energy system.” Renewable Energy, 136: 1119–1129.
  29. Qazi, Umair Yaqub. 2022. “Future of hydrogen as an alternative fuel for next-generation industrial applications; challenges and expected opportunities.” Energies, 15(13): 4741.
  30. Rand, Joseph, Rose Strauss, Will Gorman, Joachim Seel, Julie Mulvaney Kemp, Seongeun Jeong, Dana Robson, and Ryan H Wiser. 2023. “Queued Up: Characteristics of Power Plants Seeking Transmission Interconnection As of the End of 2022.” Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
  31. Rapid Energy Policy Evaluation and Analysis Toolkit. 2022. “REPEAT.” Princeton University.
  32. Sánchez-Pérez, Pedro Andrés, Martin Staadecker, Julia Szinai, Sarah Kurtz, and Patricia Hidalgo-Gonzalez. 2022. “Effect of modeled time horizon on quantifying the need for long-duration storage.” Applied Energy, 317: 119022.
  33. Schivley, Greg. 2020. “PowerGenome.” https://github.com/PowerGenome/PowerGenome, Accessed: 2023-12-01.
  34. Söderman, Tarja. 2006. “Treatment of biodiversity issues in impact assessment of electricity power transmission lines: A Finnish case review.” Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 26(4): 319–338.
  35. Staadecker, Martin, Julia Szinai, Pedro A. Sánchez-Pérez, Sarah Kurtz, and Patricia Hidalgo-Gonzalez. 2023. “The Value of Long-Duration Energy Storage under Various Grid Conditions in a Zero-Emissions Future.” (Under review).
  36. U.S. Energy Information Administration. 2021. “EIA860.” U.S. Energy Information Administration.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Summarize Now