Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
41 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
41 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
7 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Video ReCap: Recursive Captioning of Hour-Long Videos (2402.13250v6)

Published 20 Feb 2024 in cs.CV
Video ReCap: Recursive Captioning of Hour-Long Videos

Abstract: Most video captioning models are designed to process short video clips of few seconds and output text describing low-level visual concepts (e.g., objects, scenes, atomic actions). However, most real-world videos last for minutes or hours and have a complex hierarchical structure spanning different temporal granularities. We propose Video ReCap, a recursive video captioning model that can process video inputs of dramatically different lengths (from 1 second to 2 hours) and output video captions at multiple hierarchy levels. The recursive video-language architecture exploits the synergy between different video hierarchies and can process hour-long videos efficiently. We utilize a curriculum learning training scheme to learn the hierarchical structure of videos, starting from clip-level captions describing atomic actions, then focusing on segment-level descriptions, and concluding with generating summaries for hour-long videos. Furthermore, we introduce Ego4D-HCap dataset by augmenting Ego4D with 8,267 manually collected long-range video summaries. Our recursive model can flexibly generate captions at different hierarchy levels while also being useful for other complex video understanding tasks, such as VideoQA on EgoSchema. Data, code, and models are available at: https://sites.google.com/view/vidrecap

Recursive Video Captioning for Extended Videos: An Insight into Video ReCap

Introduction to Video ReCap

The burgeoning field of video understanding witnesses a notable advancement with the advent of Video ReCap, a model designed for hierarchical video captioning. Unlike conventional methods that primarily cater to short video clips, Video ReCap extends its horizon to video inputs ranging from a mere second to a staggering two hours. This model stands out for its recursive video-language architecture, enabling the processing of video contents at varying temporal granularities. The essence of Video ReCap lies in its ability to generate descriptions at multiple hierarchy levels, providing a granular understanding of video content over time.

The Challenge of Long-Form Video Captioning

Addressing long-form videos demands a model with the versatility to handle diverse input lengths and the redundancy typically found in extended footage. Furthermore, comprehending the hierarchical structure embedded in long videos presents a technical challenge, necessitating a sophisticated understanding of actions, activities, and overarching themes or goals. Video ReCap proposes a solution by employing a recursive architecture that intelligently leverages different levels of video detail, facilitated by a curriculum learning training scheme.

Recursive Architecture and Hierarchical Curriculum Learning

The operation of Video ReCap is delineated into three primary components: a video encoder for feature extraction, a video-language (VL) alignment module for mapping video and text features, and a recursive text decoder for generating captions across various hierarchy levels. This recursive model structure allows for efficient handling of very long video inputs while preserving the quality of generated captions. The curriculum learning approach mirrors human capability to perceive actions, starting from understanding atomic actions, moving to intermediate steps, and finally inferring overarching goals or intents, thereby effectively learning the hierarchical structure of videos.

Ego4D-HCap Dataset Contribution

To evaluate its performance, Video ReCap is put to the test on the Ego4D-HCap dataset— a novel benchmark introduced by the authors. This dataset embodies a commendable resource for hierarchical video captioning with its long-range egocentric videos and annotated captions at multiple levels, providing a rich ground for validating the effectiveness of Video ReCap and advancing research in complex video understanding tasks.

Empirical Evidence and Future Prospects

Significant numerical results underline the effectiveness of Video ReCap, showcasing superior performance over existing video captioning baselines across all temporal hierarchies. In particular, it achieves notable success in long-form video question answering on the EgoSchema dataset, illustrating the utility of hierarchical video captions in complex video understanding tasks. As the research horizon expands, potential future directions include exploring real-time caption generation, interactive video understanding, and video-based dialoging, promising further exploration into making video understanding models more robust and versatile.

Concluding Remarks

Video ReCap introduces a significant advancement in the domain of video understanding, especially in handling long-form videos with a nuanced appreciation of their hierarchical structure. Its recursive architecture coupled with a curriculum learning approach not only sets a new benchmark in the field but also opens new avenues for research and application in AI. As we look forward to the future development and application of Video ReCap and similar models, the potential for enhancing our interaction with and understanding of video content remains vast and largely untapped.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (69)
  1. Video ReCap webpage: https://sites.google.com/view/vidrecap.
  2. Flamingo: a visual language model for few-shot learning. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35:23716–23736, 2022.
  3. Hiervl: Learning hierarchical video-language embeddings. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 23066–23078, 2023.
  4. Neural machine translation by jointly learning to align and translate. arXiv preprint arXiv:1409.0473, 2014.
  5. Albert Bandura. Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Asian journal of social psychology, 2(1):21–41, 1999.
  6. Meteor: An automatic metric for mt evaluation with improved correlation with human judgments. In Proceedings of the acl workshop on intrinsic and extrinsic evaluation measures for machine translation and/or summarization, pages 65–72, 2005.
  7. My view is the best view: Procedure learning from egocentric videos. In European Conference on Computer Vision, pages 657–675. Springer, 2022.
  8. Hierarchical boundary-aware neural encoder for video captioning. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 1657–1666, 2017.
  9. Midwest and Its Children: The Psychological Ecology of an American Town. Row, Peterson, 1954.
  10. Is space-time attention all you need for video understanding? In ICML, page 4, 2021.
  11. Doing without schema hierarchies: a recurrent connectionist approach to normal and impaired routine sequential action. Psychological review, 111(2):395, 2004.
  12. Language models are few-shot learners. Advances in neural information processing systems, 33:1877–1901, 2020.
  13. Collecting highly parallel data for paraphrase evaluation. In Proceedings of the 49th annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics: human language technologies, pages 190–200, 2011.
  14. Valor: Vision-audio-language omni-perception pretraining model and dataset. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.08345, 2023.
  15. Scaling instruction-finetuned language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.11416, 2022.
  16. Hierarchical schemas and goals in the control of sequential behavior. 2006.
  17. Long-term recurrent convolutional networks for visual recognition and description. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 2625–2634, 2015.
  18. An image is worth 16x16 words: Transformers for image recognition at scale. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.11929, 2020.
  19. An empirical study of end-to-end video-language transformers with masked visual modeling. 2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 22898–22909, 2022.
  20. Ego4d: Around the world in 3,000 hours of egocentric video. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 18995–19012, 2022.
  21. Long short-term memory. Neural computation, 9(8):1735–1780, 1997.
  22. Attention-based multimodal fusion for video description. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision, pages 4193–4202, 2017.
  23. Multimodal pretraining for dense video captioning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2011.11760, 2020.
  24. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. CoRR, abs/1412.6980, 2014.
  25. Natural language description of human activities from video images based on concept hierarchy of actions. International Journal of Computer Vision, 50:171–184, 2002.
  26. Dense-captioning events in videos. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision, pages 706–715, 2017.
  27. Fluency-guided cross-lingual image captioning. In Proceedings of the 25th ACM international conference on Multimedia, pages 1549–1557, 2017.
  28. Mart: Memory-augmented recurrent transformer for coherent video paragraph captioning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.05402, 2020.
  29. Blip-2: Bootstrapping language-image pre-training with frozen image encoders and large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.12597, 2023.
  30. Hero: Hierarchical encoder for video+language omni-representation pre-training. In Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 2020.
  31. Chin-Yew Lin. Rouge: A package for automatic evaluation of summaries. In Text summarization branches out, pages 74–81, 2004.
  32. Egocentric video-language pretraining. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35:7575–7586, 2022.
  33. Decoupled weight decay regularization. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2017.
  34. Univl: A unified video and language pre-training model for multimodal understanding and generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2002.06353, 2020.
  35. Egoschema: A diagnostic benchmark for very long-form video language understanding. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.09126, 2023.
  36. Clipcap: Clip prefix for image captioning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.09734, 2021.
  37. Hierarchical recurrent neural encoder for video representation with application to captioning. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 1029–1038, 2016.
  38. Video captioning with transferred semantic attributes. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 6504–6512, 2017.
  39. Memory-attended recurrent network for video captioning. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 8347–8356, 2019.
  40. Egovlpv2: Egocentric video-language pre-training with fusion in the backbone. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 5285–5297, 2023.
  41. Language models are unsupervised multitask learners. OpenAI blog, 1(8):9, 2019.
  42. Movie description. International Journal of Computer Vision, 123:94–120, 2017.
  43. Translating video content to natural language descriptions. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision, pages 433–440, 2013.
  44. Distilbert, a distilled version of bert: Smaller, faster, cheaper and lighter. arxiv 2019. arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.01108, 2019.
  45. Assembly101: A large-scale multi-view video dataset for understanding procedural activities. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 21096–21106, 2022.
  46. End-to-end generative pretraining for multimodal video captioning. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 17959–17968, 2022.
  47. From deterministic to generative: Multimodal stochastic rnns for video captioning. IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems, 30(10):3047–3058, 2018.
  48. Ego4d goal-step: Toward hierarchical understanding of procedural activities. In Thirty-seventh Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems Datasets and Benchmarks Track, 2023.
  49. Semantic aware video transcription using random forest classifiers. In Computer Vision–ECCV 2014: 13th European Conference, Zurich, Switzerland, September 6-12, 2014, Proceedings, Part I 13, pages 772–786. Springer, 2014.
  50. Videobert: A joint model for video and language representation learning. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, pages 7464–7473, 2019.
  51. Sequence to sequence learning with neural networks. Advances in neural information processing systems, 27, 2014.
  52. Coin: A large-scale dataset for comprehensive instructional video analysis. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 1207–1216, 2019.
  53. Attention is all you need. Advances in neural information processing systems, 30, 2017.
  54. Cider: Consensus-based image description evaluation. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 4566–4575, 2015.
  55. Sequence to sequence-video to text. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision, pages 4534–4542, 2015.
  56. Reconstruction network for video captioning. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 7622–7631, 2018.
  57. Omnivl: One foundation model for image-language and video-language tasks. Advances in neural information processing systems, 35:5696–5710, 2022a.
  58. Vatex: A large-scale, high-quality multilingual dataset for video-and-language research. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 4581–4591, 2019.
  59. Internvideo: General video foundation models via generative and discriminative learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.03191, 2022b.
  60. Msr-vtt: A large video description dataset for bridging video and language. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 5288–5296, 2016.
  61. Jointly modeling deep video and compositional text to bridge vision and language in a unified framework. In Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, 2015.
  62. Zero-shot video question answering via frozen bidirectional language models. ArXiv, abs/2206.08155, 2022.
  63. Vid2seq: Large-scale pretraining of a visual language model for dense video captioning. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 10714–10726, 2023.
  64. Describing videos by exploiting temporal structure. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision, pages 4507–4515, 2015.
  65. mplug-owl: Modularization empowers large language models with multimodality. ArXiv, abs/2304.14178, 2023.
  66. Cross-modal and hierarchical modeling of video and text. In European Conference on Computer Vision, 2018.
  67. Learning video representations from large language models. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 6586–6597, 2023.
  68. Towards automatic learning of procedures from web instructional videos. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2018.
  69. Cross-task weakly supervised learning from instructional videos. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 3537–3545, 2019.
User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (6)
  1. Md Mohaiminul Islam (13 papers)
  2. Ngan Ho (1 paper)
  3. Xitong Yang (27 papers)
  4. Tushar Nagarajan (33 papers)
  5. Lorenzo Torresani (73 papers)
  6. Gedas Bertasius (55 papers)
Citations (20)
Youtube Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com