Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
167 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
42 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Self-Perception Versus Objective Driving Behavior: Subject Study of Lateral Vehicle Guidance (2402.13104v2)

Published 20 Feb 2024 in eess.SY, cs.RO, and cs.SY

Abstract: Advancements in technology are steering attention toward creating comfortable and acceptable driving characteristics in autonomous vehicles. Ensuring a safe and comfortable ride experience is vital for the widespread adoption of autonomous vehicles, as mismatches in driving styles between humans and autonomous systems can impact passenger confidence. Current driving functions have fixed parameters, and there is no universally agreed-upon driving style for autonomous vehicles. Integrating driving style preferences into automated vehicles may enhance acceptance and reduce uncertainty, expediting their adoption. A controlled vehicle study (N = 62) was conducted with a variety of German participants to identify the individual lateral driving behavior of human drivers, specifically emphasizing rural roads. We introduce novel indicators for assessing stationary and transient curve negotiation, directly applicable in developing personalized lateral driving functions. To assess the predictability of these indicators using self-reports, we introduce the MDSI-DE, the German version of the Multidimensional Driving Style Inventory. The correlation analysis between MDSI factor scores and proposed indicators showed modest but significant associations, primarily with acceleration and jerk statistics while the in-depth lateral driving behavior turned out to be highly driver-heterogeneous. The dataset including the anonymized socio-demographics and questionnaire responses, the raw vehicle measurements including labels, and the derived driving behavior indicators are publicly available at https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/jhaselberger/spodb-subject-study-of-lateral-vehicle-guidance.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (191)
  1. Modelling the effect of aggressive driver behavior on longitudinal performance measures during car-following. Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour, 92:176–200.
  2. af Wåhlberg, A. (2017). Driver behaviour and accident research methodology: unresolved problems. CRC Press.
  3. How reliable are self-report measures of mileage, violations and crashes? Safety Science, 76:67–73.
  4. Driving style recognition using fuzzy logic. In 2012 IEEE International Conference on Vehicular Electronics and Safety (ICVES 2012), pages 460–463. IEEE.
  5. How accurately do drivers evaluate their own driving behavior? an on-road observational study. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 63:65–73.
  6. Andy, F. (2009). Discovering statistics using spss.
  7. Apel, A. (1997). Modellierung des Fahrverhaltens bei Längs-und Querführung von PKW. Institut für Fahrzeugtechnik, TU Braunschweig.
  8. Association, W. M. et al. (2013). World medical association declaration of helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. Jama, 310(20):2191–2194.
  9. Self-driving like a human driver instead of a robocar: Personalized comfortable driving experience for autonomous vehicles. arXiv preprint arXiv:2001.03908.
  10. Evaluating rainy weather effects on driving behaviour dimensions of driving behaviour questionnaire. Journal of advanced transportation, 2022:1–10.
  11. Probabilistic driving style determination by means of a situation based analysis of the vehicle data. In 2011 14th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), pages 1698–1703. IEEE.
  12. A classification method for driver trajectories during curve-negotiation. In 2019 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (SMC), pages 3729–3734. IEEE.
  13. A context aware system for driving style evaluation by an ensemble learning on smartphone sensors data. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 89:303–320.
  14. Convolutional neural network with adaptive regularization to classify driving styles on smartphones. IEEE transactions on intelligent transportation systems, 21(2):543–552.
  15. Can we study autonomous driving comfort in moving-base driving simulators? a validation study. Human factors, 59(3):442–456.
  16. Objective metrics of comfort: Developing a driving style for highly automated vehicles. Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour, 41:45–54.
  17. Comfort in automated driving: An analysis of preferences for different automated driving styles and their dependence on personality traits. Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour, 55:90–100.
  18. Bengtsson, J. (2001). Adaptive cruise control and driver modeling. Department of Automatic Control, Lund Institute of Technology.
  19. Multimodel approach to personalized autonomous adaptive cruise control. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles, 4(2):321–330.
  20. An instrumented vehicle assessment of problem behavior and driving style:: Do younger males really take more risks? Accident Analysis & Prevention, 34(1):51–64.
  21. Volvo and infiniti drivers’ experiences with select crash avoidance technologies. Traffic injury prevention, 11(3):270–278.
  22. Comparison of different driving style analysis approaches based on trip segmentation over gps information. In 2017 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data), pages 3784–3791. IEEE.
  23. Investigation of personality traits and driving styles for individualization of autonomous vehicles. In Intelligent Human Systems Integration 2021: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Intelligent Human Systems Integration (IHSI 2021): Integrating People and Intelligent Systems, February 22-24, 2021, Palermo, Italy, pages 78–83. Springer.
  24. Buck, M. (1992). Geschwindigkeitsverhalten auf einbahnigen außerortsstraßen in abhängigkeit von baulichen, betrieblichen und verkehrlichen randbedingungen. Forschung Straßenbau und Straßenverkehrstechnik, (621).
  25. The aggression questionnaire. Journal of personality and social psychology, 63(3):452.
  26. Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience. Nature reviews neuroscience, 14(5):365–376.
  27. Identification of the driving style for the adaptation of assistance systems. International Journal of Vehicle Autonomous Systems, 13(3):244–260.
  28. How can humans understand their automated cars? hmi principles, problems and solutions. Cognition, Technology & Work, 21(1):3–20.
  29. Driver behavior profiling using smartphones: A low-cost platform for driver monitoring. IEEE Intelligent transportation systems magazine, 7(1):91–102.
  30. Driving style recognition under connected circumstance using a supervised hierarchical bayesian model. Journal of advanced transportation, 2021:1–12.
  31. Driving style clustering using naturalistic driving data. Transportation research record, 2673(6):176–188.
  32. Curve speed model for driver assistance based on driving style classification. IET Intelligent Transport Systems, 11(8):501–510.
  33. Self-learning optimal cruise control based on individual car-following style. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 22(10):6622–6633.
  34. A global measure of perceived stress. Journal of health and social behavior, pages 385–396.
  35. Covid-19 and its effects on the driving style of spanish drivers. Ieee Access, 9:146680–146690.
  36. Cox, I. J. (1991). Blanche-an experiment in guidance and navigation of an autonomous robot vehicle. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 7(2):193–204.
  37. A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of consulting psychology, 24(4):349.
  38. Development of a driving anger scale. Psychological reports, 74(1):83–91.
  39. Delhomme, P. (1991). Comparing one’s driving with others’: assessment of abilities and frequency of offences. evidence for a superior conformity of self-bias? Accident Analysis & Prevention, 23(6):493–508.
  40. Ein beitrag zur prädiktion des fahrstils. VDI Berichte, pages 47–59.
  41. Driving style recognition method using braking characteristics based on hidden markov model. PloS one, 12(8):e0182419.
  42. Curve safe speed model considering driving style based on driver behaviour questionnaire. Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour, 65:536–547.
  43. A probabilistic model for driving-style-recognition-enabled driver steering behaviors. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 52(3):1838–1851.
  44. Comfort or not? automated driving style and user characteristics causing human discomfort in automated driving. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 37(4):331–339.
  45. Bericht der Ethik-Kommission für Automatisiertes und Vernetztes Fahren. Bundesministerium für Verkehr und digitale Infrastruktur, Berlin.
  46. Driver steering behavior model based on lane-keeping characteristics analysis. In 17th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), pages 623–628. IEEE.
  47. Understanding and using factor scores: Considerations for the applied researcher. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 14(1):20.
  48. Characterizing driving styles with deep learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1607.03611.
  49. Towards user-focused vehicle automation: the architectural approach of the autoakzept project. In HCI in Mobility, Transport, and Automotive Systems. Automated Driving and In-Vehicle Experience Design: Second International Conference, MobiTAS 2020, Held as Part of the 22nd HCI International Conference, HCII 2020, Copenhagen, Denmark, July 19–24, 2020, Proceedings, Part I 22, pages 15–30. Springer.
  50. Volvo drivers’ experiences with advanced crash avoidance and related technologies. Traffic injury prevention, 15(2):187–195.
  51. Exploring automated vehicle driving styles as a source of trust information. Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour, 65:268–279.
  52. Autonomous vehicles: Building a test-bed prototype at a controlled environment. In 2020 IEEE 6th World Forum on Internet of Things (WF-IoT), page 1–6. IEEE.
  53. Behavioral correlates of individual differences in road-traffic crash risk: An examination of methods and findings. Psychological bulletin, 113(2):279.
  54. Ericsson, E. (2000). Variability in urban driving patterns. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 5(5):337–354.
  55. Evans, L. (2004). Traffic safety.
  56. Farah, H. (2011). Age and gender differences in overtaking maneuvers on two-lane rural highways. Transportation research record, 2248(1):30–36.
  57. A passing gap acceptance model for two-lane rural highways. Transportmetrica, 5(3):159–172.
  58. Driving style analysis by classifying real-world data with support vector clustering. In 2018 3rd IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Engineering (ICITE), pages 264–268. IEEE.
  59. Der einfluss fahrfremder tätigkeiten und manöverlängsdynamik auf die komfort-und sicherheitswahrnehmung beim hochautomatisierten fahren. VW-Gemeinschaftstagung Fahrerassistenz und automatisiertes Fahren, Wolfsburg.
  60. Decision-making style, driving style, and self-reported involvement in road traffic accidents. Ergonomics, 36(6):627–644.
  61. Cross-cultural perspective of driving style in young adults: Psychometric evaluation through the analysis of the multidimensional driving style inventory. Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour, 73:425–432.
  62. Self-rated driving performance among elderly drivers referred for driving evaluation. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 37(4):613–618.
  63. Personality correlates of convicted drivers. Personality and individual differences, 14(2):329–336.
  64. Personalized adaptive cruise control based on online driving style recognition technology and model predictive control. IEEE transactions on vehicular technology, 69(11):12482–12496.
  65. Gasser, T. (2013). Herausforderung automatischen fahrens und forschungsschwerpunkte. 6. Tagung Fahrerassistenz, München.
  66. Drivers’ lane-keeping ability in heavy rain: Preliminary investigation using shrp 2 naturalistic driving study data. Transportation research record, 2663(1):99–108.
  67. Utilizing naturalistic driving data for in-depth analysis of driver lane-keeping behavior in rain: Non-parametric mars and parametric logistic regression modeling approaches. Transportation research part C: emerging technologies, 90:379–392.
  68. What have we learned? a review of stated preference and choice studies on autonomous vehicles. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 98:323–337.
  69. Modeling human lane keeping control in highway driving with validation by naturalistic data. In 2014 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC), pages 2507–2512. IEEE.
  70. Self-evaluation of drivers’ skill: A cross-cultural comparison. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 21(3):217–224.
  71. Risk, hazard perception and perceived control.
  72. Should my car drive as i do? what kind of driving style do drivers prefer for the design of automated driving functions. In Braunschweiger Symposium, volume 10, pages 185–204.
  73. Dimensions of driver stress. Ergonomics, 32(6):585–602.
  74. The effect of age, gender and attitudes on self-regulation in driving. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 45:19–28.
  75. Drive me comfortable: customized automated driving styles for younger and older drivers. 8. VDI-Tagung “Der Fahrer im, 21:442–456.
  76. Driving comfort, enjoyment and acceptance of automated driving–effects of drivers’ age and driving style familiarity. Ergonomics, 61(8):1017–1032.
  77. Jupiter–ros based vehicle platform for autonomous driving research. In 2022 IEEE International Symposium on Robotic and Sensors Environments (ROSE), pages 1–8. IEEE.
  78. A survey of personalization for advanced driver assistance systems. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles, 5(2):335–344.
  79. An individual driving behavior portrait approach for professional driver of hdvs with naturalistic driving data. Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2022.
  80. Validation of the driver behaviour questionnaire using behavioural data from an instrumented vehicle and high-fidelity driving simulator. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 75:245–251.
  81. Attribute-based development of driver assistance systems. In 10th International Munich Chassis Symposium 2019: chassis. tech plus, pages 293–306. Springer.
  82. Differential moderating effect of locus of control on effect of driving experience in young male and female drivers. Personality and individual differences, 48(7):821–826.
  83. The romanian version of the multidimensional driving style inventory: Psychometric properties and cultural specificities. Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour, 35:45–59.
  84. A smartphone-based sensing platform to model aggressive driving behaviors. In Proceedings of the sigchi conference on human factors in computing systems, pages 4047–4056.
  85. Inagaki, T. et al. (2003). Adaptive automation: Sharing and trading of control. Handbook of cognitive task design, 8:147–169.
  86. Characterisation of motorway driving style using naturalistic driving data. Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour, 69:72–79.
  87. jamovi project, T. (2023). jamovi (version 2.3).
  88. Driver lane keeping behavior in normal driving using 100-car naturalistic driving study data. In 2016 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), pages 227–232. IEEE.
  89. A decrease in brain activation associated with driving when listening to someone speak. Brain research, 1205:70–80.
  90. Learning autonomous vehicle passengers’ preferred driving styles using gg plots and haptic feedback. In 2019 IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference (ITSC), pages 4012–4017. IEEE.
  91. Smartphones as an integrated platform for monitoring driver behaviour: The role of sensor fusion and connectivity. Transportation research part C: emerging technologies, 95:867–882.
  92. The identification of malaysian driving styles using the multidimensional driving style inventory. In MATEC Web of Conferences, volume 90, page 01004. EDP Sciences.
  93. Encoding human driving styles in motion planning for autonomous vehicles. In 2021 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pages 1050–1056. IEEE.
  94. Comparison of self-report and objective measures of driving behavior and road safety: A systematic review. Journal of safety research, 65:141–151.
  95. Driving style-based conditional variational autoencoder for prediction of ego vehicle trajectory. IEEE Access, 9:169348–169356.
  96. Kleisen, L. (2011). The relationship between thinking and driving styles and their contribution to young driver road safety. University of Canberra Bruce, Australia.
  97. Identification of aggressive driving from naturalistic data in car-following situations. Journal of safety research, 73:225–234.
  98. Speed and acceleration as measures of driving style in young male drivers. Perceptual and motor skills, 85(1):3–16.
  99. Self-report instruments and methods. In Handbook of traffic psychology, pages 43–59. Elsevier.
  100. Can we trust self-reports of driving? effects of impression management on driver behaviour questionnaire responses. Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour, 6(2):97–107.
  101. Big data & analytics platform for adas/ad. In Bäker, B. and Unger, A., editors, Diagnose in mechatronischen Fahrzeugsystemen XIV, volume 14, pages 263–284. TUDpress, Dresden.
  102. Assessing drivers’ trust of automated vehicle driving styles with a two-part mixed model of intervention tendency and magnitude. Human factors, 63(2):197–209.
  103. Lee, S. A. (2020). Coronavirus anxiety scale: A brief mental health screener for covid-19 related anxiety. Death studies, 44(7):393–401.
  104. Objektive erfassung und subjektive bewertung menschlicher trajektorienwahl in einer naturalistic driving study. In 9. VDI-Fachtagung" Der Fahrer im 21. Jahrhundert": Der Mensch im Fokus technischer Innovationen, pages 177–192. Springer-VDI-Verlag GmbH & Co. KG.
  105. Cognitive cars: A new frontier for adas research. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 13(1):395–407.
  106. An overview on study of identification of driver behavior characteristics for automotive control. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2014.
  107. Exploiting multi-source data for adversarial driving style representation learning. In International Conference on Database Systems for Advanced Applications, pages 491–508. Springer.
  108. Reliability and validity of the multidimensional driving style inventory in chinese drivers. Traffic injury prevention, 20(2):152–157.
  109. Lopez, C. (1997). Going faster: Mastering the art of race driving, robert bentley. Inc., Cambridge, MA.
  110. Driving-style-based codesign optimization of an automated electric vehicle: A cyber-physical system approach. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 66(4):2965–2975.
  111. A method for making a fair evaluation of driving styles in different scenarios with recommendations for their improvement. IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine, 13(1):136–148.
  112. Driving style recognition for intelligent vehicle control and advanced driver assistance: A survey. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 19(3):666–676.
  113. Modeling reaction time in car-following behaviour based on human factors. International Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 3(9):325–333.
  114. Driving style representation in convolutional recurrent neural network model of driver identification. arXiv preprint arXiv:2102.05843.
  115. Driver’s style classification using jerk analysis. In 2009 IEEE workshop on computational intelligence in vehicles and vehicular systems, pages 23–28. IEEE.
  116. Are novice drivers overconfident? a comparison of self-assessed and examiner-assessed driver competences in a finnish and swedish sample. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 12(2):120–130.
  117. Toward adaptive driving styles for automated driving with users’ trust and preferences. In 2022 17th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), pages 940–944. IEEE.
  118. Relationships among driving styles, desire for control, illusion of control, and self-reported driving behaviors. Traffic injury prevention, 22(5):372–377.
  119. Tactical decisions for lane changes or lane following: Assessment of automated driving styles under real-world conditions. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles, 8(1):502–511.
  120. Adaptation of the multidimensional driving styles inventory for spanish drivers: Convergent and predictive validity evidence for detecting safe and unsafe driving styles. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 136:105413.
  121. Validation of driving behaviour as a step towards the investigation of connected and automated vehicles by means of driving simulators. In 2017 5th IEEE International Conference on Models and Technologies for Intelligent Transportation Systems (MT-ITS), pages 274–279. IEEE.
  122. Validation of the driver behavior questionnaire in a representative sample of iranian drivers. Civil Engineering Infrastructures Journal, 53(1):161–171.
  123. Happy driver: Investigating the effect of mood on preferred style of driving in self-driving cars. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction, pages 139–147.
  124. Fingerprint des fahrers zur adaption von assistenzsystemen. INFORMATIK 2012.
  125. Adaptation and personalization in driver assistance systems. In 2019 24th Conference of Open Innovations Association (FRUCT), pages 335–344. IEEE.
  126. A study on the relationship between personality and driving styles. Traffic injury prevention, 14(4):346–352.
  127. Reliability and validity of a spanish-language version of the multidimensional driving style inventory. Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour, 17:75–87.
  128. Drivers’speed choice: An in-depth study. TRL report 326.
  129. Literaturanalyse und methodenauswahl zur gestaltung von systemen zum hochautomatisierten fahren. FAT Schriftenreihe, 276.
  130. Comparing the effect of age, gender, and desired speed on car-following behavior by using driving simulator. Journal of advanced transportation, 2021:1–7.
  131. A first approach to understanding and measuring naturalness in driver-car interaction. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, pages 1–10.
  132. Personalised lane keeping assist strategy: Adaptation to driving style. IET Control Theory & Applications, 13(1):106–115.
  133. A lane keeping assist design: Adaptation to driving style based on aggressiveness. In 2019 American Control Conference (ACC), pages 5316–5321. IEEE.
  134. Crash avoidance and driver assistance technologies–are they used? Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour, 52:176–190.
  135. Errors and violations on the roads: a real distinction? Ergonomics, 33(10-11):1315–1332.
  136. Driving simulator study of the relationship between motion strategy preference and self-reported driving behavior. Simulation, 97(9):619–633.
  137. Introducing a multivariate model for predicting driving performance: The role of driving anger and personal characteristics. Journal of safety research, 47:47–56.
  138. Technologie-roadmap für das autonome autofahren: Eine wettbewerbsorientierte technik-und marktstudie für deutschland. Technical report, Working Paper Forschungsförderung.
  139. Learning driver’s behavior to improve the acceptance of adaptive cruise contr. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, volume 26, pages 2317–2322.
  140. Towards adapting cars to their drivers. AI Magazine, 33(4):46–46.
  141. Drive me naturally: design and evaluation of trajectories for highly automated driving manoeuvres on rural roads. Technology for an Ageing Society, Postersession Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Europe.
  142. Do you shift or not? influence of trajectory behaviour on perceived safety during automated driving on rural roads. In HCI in Mobility, Transport, and Automotive Systems: First International Conference, MobiTAS 2019, Held as Part of the 21st HCI International Conference, HCII 2019, Orlando, FL, USA, July 26-31, 2019, Proceedings 21, pages 245–254. Springer.
  143. I care who and where you are–influence of type, position and quantity of oncoming vehicles on perceived safety during automated driving on rural roads. In HCI in Mobility, Transport, and Automotive Systems. Driving Behavior, Urban and Smart Mobility: Second International Conference, MobiTAS 2020, Held as Part of the 22nd HCI International Conference, HCII 2020, Copenhagen, Denmark, July 19–24, 2020, Proceedings, Part II 22, pages 61–71. Springer.
  144. Diskomfort im hochautomatisierten fahren—eine untersuchung unterschiedlicher fahrstile im fahrsimulator. Arbeit interdisziplinär analysieren—bewerten—gestalten, 65.
  145. I also care in manual driving - Influence of type, position and quantity of oncoming vehicles on manual driving behaviour in curves on rural roads, pages 75 – 85.
  146. Saad, F. (2004). Behavioural adaptations to new driver support systems: some critical issues. In 2004 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (IEEE Cat. No. 04CH37583), volume 1, pages 288–293. IEEE.
  147. A review of research on driving styles and road safety. Human factors, 57(7):1248–1275.
  148. Fahrerspezifische geschwindigkeitsprofile für die automatische oder die kooperative fahrt. at-Automatisierungstechnik, 66(1):53–65.
  149. A new haptic shared controller reducing steering conflicts. In 2018 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC), pages 2705–2710. IEEE.
  150. Self-reports of safe driving behaviors in relationship to sex, age, education and income in the us adult driving population. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 33(1):111–116.
  151. Shouno, O. (2018). Deep unsupervised learning of a topological map of vehicle maneuvers for characterizing driving styles. In 2018 21st International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), pages 2917–2922. IEEE.
  152. Cross-cultural differences in driver self-assessment. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 21(4):371–375.
  153. The role of executive function, personality and attitudes to risks in explaining self-reported driving behaviour in adolescent and adult male drivers. Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour, 38:127–136.
  154. Real autonomous driving from a passenger’s perspective: Two experimental investigations using gaze behaviour and trust ratings in field and simulator. Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour, 66:15–28.
  155. Profiles in driver distraction: Effects of cell phone conversations on younger and older drivers. Human factors, 46(4):640–649.
  156. An intention-aware and online driving style estimation based personalized autonomous driving strategy. International journal of automotive technology, 21(6):1431–1446.
  157. Research on the classification and identification of driver’s driving style. In 2017 10th International Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Design (ISCID), volume 1, pages 28–32. IEEE.
  158. Exploring personalised autonomous vehicles to influence user trust. Cognitive Computation, 12:1170–1186.
  159. Svenson, O. (1981). Are we all less risky and more skillful than our fellow drivers? Acta psychologica, 47(2):143–148.
  160. Effect of light duty vehicle performance on a driving style metric. Transportation Research Record, 2672(25):67–78.
  161. The value of self-report measures as indicators of driving behaviors among young drivers. Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour, 39:33–42.
  162. Family climate for road safety: A new concept and measure. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 54:1–14.
  163. The multidimensional driving style inventory—scale construct and validation. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 36(3):323–332.
  164. A multi-factorial framework for understanding reckless driving—appraisal indicators and perceived environmental determinants. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 7(6):333–349.
  165. The multidimensional driving style inventory a decade later: Review of the literature and re-evaluation of the scale. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 93:179–188.
  166. Assessment and profiling of driving style and skills. User Experience Design in the Era of Automated Driving, pages 151–176.
  167. Factor structure and measurement invariance of the multidimensional driving style inventory across gender and age: an esem approach. Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour, 71:23–30.
  168. The relation between self-reported driving style and driving behaviour. a simulator study. Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour, 56:245–255.
  169. Measuring driving styles: a validation of the multidimensional driving style inventory. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, pages 257–264.
  170. Learning to drive safely: Social-cognitive responses are predictive of performance rated by novice drivers and their instructors. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 8(1):59–74.
  171. Systematic literature review on driving behavior. In 2017 IEEE 20th international conference on intelligent transportation systems (ITSC), pages 1–8. IEEE.
  172. Investigation of drivers’ thresholds of a subjectively accepted driving performance with a focus on automated driving. Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour, 56:280–292.
  173. Wang, F.-Y. (2010). Parallel control and management for intelligent transportation systems: Concepts, architectures, and applications. IEEE transactions on intelligent transportation systems, 11(3):630–638.
  174. Driving style classification using a semisupervised support vector machine. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems, 47(5):650–660.
  175. Effect of personality traits on driving style: Psychometric adaption of the multidimensional driving style inventory in a chinese sample. PLoS one, 13(9):e0202126.
  176. Is passenger presence associated with more or less risk taking? In BEHAVIOURAL RESEARCH IN ROAD SAFETY: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 10TH SEMINAR ON BEHAVIOURAL RESEARCH IN ROAD SAFETY, 3-5 APRIL 2000.
  177. Modellbasierte komfortbewertung von fahrerassistenzsystemen/model-based comfort evaluation of driver assistance systems. VDI-Berichte, (1900).
  178. The driving vengeance questionnaire (dvq): The development of a scale to measure deviant drivers’ attitudes. Violence and Victims, 15(2):115–136.
  179. Methodological considerations regarding motorcycle naturalistic riding investigations based on the use of gg diagrams for rider profile detection. Safety science, 129:104840.
  180. Automated driving system, male, or female driver: Who’d you prefer? comparative analysis of passengers’ mental conditions, emotional states & qualitative feedback. In Proceedings of the 8th international conference on automotive user interfaces and interactive vehicular applications, pages 51–58.
  181. Dynamic state estimation of driving style based on driving risk feature. International Journal of Automotive Engineering, 9(1):31–38.
  182. A comprehensive review of the development of adaptive cruise control systems. Vehicle system dynamics, 48(10):1167–1192.
  183. Establishing style-oriented driver models by imitating human driving behaviors. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 16(5):2522–2530.
  184. A new lane departure warning algorithm considering the driver’s behavior characteristics. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2015.
  185. Consistency analysis of driving style classification based on subjective evaluation and objective driving behavior. In International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, pages 58–71. Springer.
  186. Rapid driving style recognition in car-following using machine learning and vehicle trajectory data. Journal of advanced transportation, 2019.
  187. Eu long-term dataset with multiple sensors for autonomous driving. In 2020 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), page 10697–10704. IEEE.
  188. Data-driven intelligent transportation systems: A survey. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 12(4):1624–1639.
  189. An investigation of the relationship between the driving behavior questionnaire and objective measures of highway driving behavior. Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour, 15(6):676–685.
  190. Zierke, B. (2010). Sichere gestaltung von landstraßen durch definierte straßentypen.
  191. Neural network modeling of ideal characteristics reference model for “car adapts to driver” x-by-wire vehicle,”. Journal of Jilin University: Engineering and Technology Edition, 43:514–520.
Citations (2)
View on Semantic Scholar

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Summarize Now