Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
88 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
11 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
52 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
5 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
10 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
33 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

A Literature Review of Literature Reviews in Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (2402.12928v5)

Published 20 Feb 2024 in cs.DL, cs.AI, and cs.CV

Abstract: The rapid advancements in Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (PAMI) have led to an overwhelming expansion of scientific knowledge, spawning numerous literature reviews aimed at collecting and synthesizing fragmented information. This paper presents a thorough analysis of these literature reviews within the PAMI field, and tries to address three core research questions: (1) What are the prevalent structural and statistical characteristics of PAMI literature reviews? (2) What strategies can researchers employ to efficiently navigate the growing corpus of reviews? (3) What are the advantages and limitations of AI-generated reviews compared to human-authored ones? To address the first research question, we begin with a narrative overview to highlight common preferences in composing PAMI reviews, followed by a statistical analysis to quantitatively uncover patterns in these preferences. Our findings reveal several key insights. First, fewer than 20% of PAMI reviews currently comply with PRISMA standards, although this proportion is gradually increasing. Second, there is a moderate positive correlation between the quality of references and the scholarly impact of reviews, emphasizing the importance of reference selection. To further assist researchers in efficiently managing the rapidly growing number of literature reviews, we introduce four novel, real-time, article-level bibliometric indicators that facilitate the screening of numerous reviews. Finally, our comparative analysis reveals that AI-generated reviews currently fall short of human-authored ones in accurately evaluating the academic significance of newly published articles and integrating rich visual elements, which limits their practical utility. Overall, this study provides a deeper understanding of PAMI literature reviews by uncovering key trends, evaluating current practices, and highlighting areas for future improvement.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (124)
  1. A. Abrishami and S. Aliakbary. Predicting citation counts based on deep neural network learning techniques. Journal of Informetrics, 13(2):485–499, 2019.
  2. Named entity extraction for knowledge graphs: A literature overview. IEEE Access, 8:32862–32881, 2020.
  3. Flamingo: a visual language model for few-shot learning. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35:23716–23736, 2022.
  4. Altum Inc. Jenni ai - your ai research assistant. https://jenni.ai/, 2023. Accessed 25 December 2023.
  5. Y. Alzahrani and B. Boufama. Biomedical image segmentation: a survey. SN Computer Science, 2:1–22, 2021.
  6. Few-shot object detection: A survey. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 54(11s):1–37, 2022.
  7. Geometric deep learning on molecular representations. Nature Machine Intelligence, 3(12):1023–1032, 2021.
  8. Ö. AYDIN. Google bard generated literature review: metaverse. Journal of AI, 7(1):1–14, 2023.
  9. Ö. Aydın and E. Karaarslan. Openai chatgpt generated literature review: Digital twin in healthcare. Available at SSRN 4308687, 2022.
  10. A. Bandini and J. Zariffa. Analysis of the hands in egocentric vision: A survey. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 2020.
  11. J. Beel and B. Gipp. Google scholar’s ranking algorithm: an introductory overview. In Proceedings of the 12th international conference on scientometrics and informetrics (ISSI’09), volume 1, pages 230–241. Rio de Janeiro (Brazil), 2009.
  12. J. Beel and B. Gipp. Academic search engine spam and google scholar’s resilience against it. Journal of electronic publishing, 13(3), 2010.
  13. J. Beel and B. Gipp. On the robustness of google scholar against spam. In Proceedings of the 21st ACM Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia, pages 297–298, 2010.
  14. Nougat: Neural optical understanding for academic documents, 2023.
  15. BlockTechnology OÜ. Ai-powered literature review generator. https://askyourpdf.com/tools/literature-review-writer, 2023. Accessed 25 December 2023.
  16. R. C. Bruce. Application of the gompertz function in studies of growth in dusky salamanders (plethodontidae: Desmognathus). Copeia, 104(1):94–100, 2016.
  17. M. Brzezinski. Power laws in citation distributions: evidence from scopus. Scientometrics, 103:213–228, 2015.
  18. Ensemble deep learning in bioinformatics. Nature Machine Intelligence, 2(9):500–508, 2020.
  19. M. A. Chandra and S. Bedi. Survey on svm and their application in image classification. International Journal of Information Technology, 13:1–11, 2021.
  20. Review of image classification algorithms based on convolutional neural networks. Remote Sensing, 13(22):4712, 2021.
  21. Towards large-scale small object detection: Survey and benchmarks. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2023.
  22. M6doc: A large-scale multi-format, multi-type, multi-layout, multi-language, multi-annotation category dataset for modern document layout analysis. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 15138–15147, 2023.
  23. H. M. Cooper. A taxonomy of literature reviews., 1985.
  24. H. M. Cooper. Organizing knowledge syntheses: A taxonomy of literature reviews. Knowledge in society, 1(1):104, 1988.
  25. A systematic review of aspect-based sentiment analysis (absa): Domains, methods, and trends. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.10777, 2023.
  26. An image is worth 16x16 words: Transformers for image recognition at scale. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2020.
  27. L. Egghe et al. Citation age data and the obsolescence function: Fits and explanations. Information Processing & Management, 28(2):201–217, 1992.
  28. Ai-generated research paper fabrication and plagiarism in the scientific community. Patterns, 4(3), 2023.
  29. A. S. for Cell Biology et al. San francisco declaration on research assessment (dora), 2012.
  30. FWCI. Field-weighted citation impact. https://libguides.usc.edu.au/researchmetrics/researchmetrics-field-weighted-citation-impact. Accessed 25 December 2023.
  31. M. J. Grant and A. Booth. A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health information & libraries journal, 26(2):91–108, 2009.
  32. A survey on self-supervised learning: Algorithms, applications, and future trends. arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.05712, 2023.
  33. Deep learning for 3d point clouds: A survey. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 43(12):4338–4364, 2020.
  34. A survey on vision transformer. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 45(1):87–110, 2023.
  35. A brief survey on semantic segmentation with deep learning. Neurocomputing, 406:302–321, 2020.
  36. Recent progress in leveraging deep learning methods for question answering. Neural Computing and Applications, pages 1–19, 2022.
  37. J. E. Harmon. Evolution of the scientific paper. Technical report, Argonne National Lab., IL (United States), 1992.
  38. Bibliometrics: the leiden manifesto for research metrics. Nature, 520(7548):429–431, 2015.
  39. A review of the gumbel-max trick and its extensions for discrete stochasticity in machine learning. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 45(2):1353–1371, 2022.
  40. A comprehensive survey of multi-view video summarization. Pattern Recognition, 109:107567, 2021.
  41. Relative citation ratio (rcr): a new metric that uses citation rates to measure influence at the article level. PLoS biology, 14(9):e1002541, 2016.
  42. From image to language: A critical analysis of visual question answering (vqa) approaches, challenges, and opportunities. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.00308, 2023.
  43. kaixindelele. Chatpaper, 2023.
  44. Transformers in vision: A survey. ACM computing surveys (CSUR), 54(10s):1–41, 2022.
  45. The role of metrics in peer assessments. Research Evaluation, 30(1):112–126, 2021.
  46. A survey on deep learning for named entity recognition. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 34(1):50–70, 2020.
  47. Object detection in optical remote sensing images: A survey and a new benchmark. ISPRS journal of photogrammetry and remote sensing, 159:296–307, 2020.
  48. A survey of convolutional neural networks: analysis, applications, and prospects. IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems, 2021.
  49. A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis. Medical image analysis, 42:60–88, 2017.
  50. Visual instruction tuning, 2023.
  51. Deep learning for generic object detection: A survey. International journal of computer vision, 128:261–318, 2020.
  52. Chinese named entity recognition: The state of the art. Neurocomputing, 473:37–53, 2022.
  53. Recent few-shot object detection algorithms: A survey with performance comparison. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, 14(4):1–36, 2023.
  54. A review of deep-learning-based medical image segmentation methods. Sustainability, 13(3):1224, 2021.
  55. Self-supervised learning: Generative or contrastive. IEEE transactions on knowledge and data engineering, 35(1):857–876, 2021.
  56. Graph self-supervised learning: A survey. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 35(6):5879–5900, 2023.
  57. A survey of visual transformers. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 2023.
  58. A survey of visual transformers. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, pages 1–21, 2023.
  59. A survey on machine learning from few samples. Pattern Recognition, 139:109480, 2023.
  60. Loss odyssey in medical image segmentation. Medical Image Analysis, 71:102035, 2021.
  61. Adversarial machine learning in image classification: A survey toward the defender’s perspective. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 55(1):1–38, 2021.
  62. Online continual learning in image classification: An empirical survey. Neurocomputing, 469:28–51, 2022.
  63. Automatic speech recognition: a survey. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 80:9411–9457, 2021.
  64. Class-incremental learning: survey and performance evaluation on image classification. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 45(5):5513–5533, 2022.
  65. The ai index 2023 annual report. Technical report, AI Index Steering Committee, Institute for Human-Centered AI, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, April 2023.
  66. E. Matricciani. The probability distribution of the age of references in engineering papers. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 34(1):7–12, 1991.
  67. Segment anything model for medical image analysis: an experimental study. Medical Image Analysis, 89:102918, 2023.
  68. R. K. Merton. The matthew effect in science: The reward and communication systems of science are considered. Science, 159(3810):56–63, 1968.
  69. Recent advances in natural language processing via large pre-trained language models: A survey. ACM Computing Surveys, 2021.
  70. Image segmentation using deep learning: A survey. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 44(7):3523–3542, 2021.
  71. H. F. Moed. Statistical relationships between downloads and citations at the level of individual documents within a single journal. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56(10):1088–1097, 2005.
  72. H. F. Moed. Measuring contextual citation impact of scientific journals. Journal of informetrics, 4(3):265–277, 2010.
  73. D. Nadeau and S. Sekine. A survey of named entity recognition and classification. Lingvisticae Investigationes, 30:3–26, 2007.
  74. Named entity recognition and relation extraction: State-of-the-art. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 54(1):1–39, 2021.
  75. OpenAI. Chatgpt: optimizing language models for dialogue. https://openai.com/blog/chatgpt/, 2022. Accessed 25 December 2023.
  76. A survey on efficient vision transformers: algorithms, techniques, and performance benchmarking. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.02031, 2023.
  77. Paper Digest. Paper digest ai-powered research platform. https://www.paperdigest.org/review/, 2023. Accessed 25 December 2023.
  78. Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews. Information & Management, 52(2):183–199, 2015.
  79. PDFMiner. PDFMiner.six. [Online; accessed 14-Nov-2023].
  80. Comparison of two article-level, field-independent citation metrics: Field-weighted citation impact (fwci) and relative citation ratio (rcr). Journal of Informetrics, 13(2):635–642, 2019.
  81. 3d object detection for autonomous driving: A survey. Pattern Recognition, 130:108796, 2022.
  82. A survey on arabic named entity recognition: Past, recent advances, and future trends. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.03512, 2023.
  83. Medical image segmentation using deep semantic-based methods: A review of techniques, applications and emerging trends. Information Fusion, 90:316–352, 2023.
  84. W. Rawat and Z. Wang. Deep convolutional neural networks for image classification: A comprehensive review. Neural computation, 29(9):2352–2449, 2017.
  85. A survey on semi-, self-and unsupervised learning for image classification. IEEE Access, 9:82146–82168, 2021.
  86. Seamlees. Seamless - ai literature review tool for scientific research. https://seaml.es/, 2023. Accessed 25 December 2023.
  87. G. Sharma and D. Sharma. Automatic text summarization methods: A comprehensive review. SN Computer Science, 4(1):33, 2022.
  88. H. Sharma and A. S. Jalal. A survey of methods, datasets and evaluation metrics for visual question answering. Image and Vision Computing, 116:104327, 2021.
  89. A survey on label-efficient deep image segmentation: Bridging the gap between weak supervision and dense prediction. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2023.
  90. The utilization of paper-level classification system on the evaluation of journal impact. arXiv e-prints, pages arXiv–2006, 2020.
  91. U-net and its variants for medical image segmentation: A review of theory and applications. Ieee Access, 9:82031–82057, 2021.
  92. H. Small. Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for information Science, 24(4):265–269, 1973.
  93. K. B. Smith. Typologies, taxonomies, and the benefits of policy classification. Policy studies journal, 30(3):379–395, 2002.
  94. A. G. Stacey. Ages of cited references and growth of scientific knowledge: an explication of the gamma distribution in business and management disciplines. Scientometrics, 126(1):619–640, 2021.
  95. J. A. Teixeira da Silva. Citescore: Advances, evolution, applications, and limitations. Publishing Research Quarterly, 36(3):459–468, 2020.
  96. Novel utilization of a paper-level classification system for the evaluation of journal impact: An update of the cas journal ranking. Quantitative Science Studies, pages 1–16, 2023.
  97. Llama: Open and efficient foundation language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.13971, 2023.
  98. The altmetric score: a new measure for article-level dissemination and impact. Annals of emergency medicine, 66(5):549–553, 2015.
  99. Population modeling of tumor growth curves and the reduced gompertz model improve prediction of the age of experimental tumors. PLoS computational biology, 16(2):e1007178, 2020.
  100. Review of large vision models and visual prompt engineering. Meta-Radiology, page 100047, 2023.
  101. A survey on large language model based autonomous agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.11432, 2023.
  102. A survey on curriculum learning. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 44(9):4555–4576, 2021.
  103. Self-supervised learning in remote sensing: A review. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine, 2022.
  104. A survey on sentiment analysis methods, applications, and challenges. Artificial Intelligence Review, 55(7):5731–5780, 2022.
  105. Recent advances in swedish and spanish medical entity recognition in clinical texts using deep neural approaches. BMC medical informatics and decision making, 19(7):1–14, 2019.
  106. Review of automatic text summarization techniques & methods. Journal of King Saud University-Computer and Information Sciences, 34(4):1029–1046, 2022.
  107. Self-supervised learning on graphs: Contrastive, generative, or predictive. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 2021.
  108. Generative adversarial networks in medical image segmentation: A review. Computers in biology and medicine, 140:105063, 2022.
  109. A. Yadav and D. K. Vishwakarma. Sentiment analysis using deep learning architectures: a review. Artificial Intelligence Review, 53(6):4335–4385, 2020.
  110. A survey on long-tailed visual recognition. International Journal of Computer Vision, 130(7):1837–1872, 2022.
  111. Diffusion models: A comprehensive survey of methods and applications. ACM Computing Surveys, 56(4):1–39, 2023.
  112. Self-supervised learning for recommender systems: A survey. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 2023.
  113. A review of recurrent neural networks: Lstm cells and network architectures. Neural computation, 31(7):1235–1270, 2019.
  114. A survey of sentiment analysis in social media. Knowledge and Information Systems, 60:617–663, 2019.
  115. L. Yujian and L. Bo. A normalized levenshtein distance metric. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 29(6):1091–1095, 2007.
  116. A survey of modern deep learning based object detection models. Digital Signal Processing, 126:103514, 2022.
  117. A survey on audio diffusion models: Text to speech synthesis and enhancement in generative ai. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.13336, 2, 2023.
  118. H. Zhang and X. Hong. Recent progresses on object detection: a brief review. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 78:27809–27847, 2019.
  119. A survey on graph diffusion models: Generative ai in science for molecule, protein and material. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.01565, 2023.
  120. Q. Zhao and X. Feng. Utilizing citation network structure to predict paper citation counts: A deep learning approach. Journal of Informetrics, 16(1):101235, 2022.
  121. A survey of large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.18223, 2023.
  122. Object detection with deep learning: A review. IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems, 30(11):3212–3232, 2019.
  123. A comprehensive survey on pretrained foundation models: A history from bert to chatgpt. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.09419, 2023.
  124. Artificial intelligence-generated scientific literature-a critical appraisal. The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice, 2023.

Summary

  • The paper introduces innovative bibliometric indicators and the RiPAMI database to quantitatively assess the quality of PAMI literature reviews.
  • The paper conducts comparative analyses across fields, time periods, and journals to reveal trends and disparities in review publications.
  • The paper proposes a structural typology for reviews that enhances clarity and guides future integration of AI in literature evaluation.

The paper "A Literature Review of Literature Reviews in Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence" presents an extensive evaluation of review papers within the field of Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (PAMI). It addresses a significant challenge faced by researchers: the substantial time and effort required to read, conduct, or peer-review comprehensive review articles.

Key Contributions and Methodology

  1. Bibliometric Indicators: The authors introduce innovative bibliometric indicators to assess the quality of review papers. These include article-level and field-normalized indicators, enhanced by the capabilities of LLMs. These indicators are crucial for evaluating reviews from a data-driven perspective.
  2. RiPAMI Database: To support the assessment, the paper introduces RiPAMI, a specialized database containing meta-data relevant to PAMI literature reviews. This database, along with a constructed topic dataset, facilitates detailed analyses of review publications.
  3. Comparative Analysis: Utilizing the proposed indicators, the paper conducts comparative analyses across various dimensions such as fields, time periods, and journals. This provides insights into the characteristics of review publications, helping to identify trends and differences.
  4. AI vs. Human Reviews: One notable aspect of the analysis is the evaluation of AI-generated literature reviews. The paper finds that these AI-generated reviews generally fall short compared to their human counterparts in multiple respects, highlighting areas where AI needs further development to match human expertise.
  5. Subjective Evaluation and Typology: The authors provide a subjective assessment of key PAMI reviews and propose a typology based on paper structure. This typology is intended to enhance the clarity and effectiveness of literature reviews, offering a framework that can also guide AI systems in creating well-structured reviews.

Insights and Future Directions

The paper concludes with a discussion on the current challenges encountered in the process of conducting literature reviews. It also explores future directions, highlighting the potential for improved methodologies and the role of AI in transforming the writing and organization of review papers.

Overall, this work offers a valuable resource for scholars in PAMI and related fields, providing strategic insights for efficiently navigating and assessing extensive review literature and hinting at viable pathways for future research and AI integration in the domain.

File Document Download Save Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com PDF File Document Download Save Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Markdown