Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
162 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Diffusion Posterior Sampling is Computationally Intractable (2402.12727v1)

Published 20 Feb 2024 in cs.LG, cs.AI, math.ST, stat.ML, and stat.TH

Abstract: Diffusion models are a remarkably effective way of learning and sampling from a distribution $p(x)$. In posterior sampling, one is also given a measurement model $p(y \mid x)$ and a measurement $y$, and would like to sample from $p(x \mid y)$. Posterior sampling is useful for tasks such as inpainting, super-resolution, and MRI reconstruction, so a number of recent works have given algorithms to heuristically approximate it; but none are known to converge to the correct distribution in polynomial time. In this paper we show that posterior sampling is \emph{computationally intractable}: under the most basic assumption in cryptography -- that one-way functions exist -- there are instances for which \emph{every} algorithm takes superpolynomial time, even though \emph{unconditional} sampling is provably fast. We also show that the exponential-time rejection sampling algorithm is essentially optimal under the stronger plausible assumption that there are one-way functions that take exponential time to invert.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (29)
  1. Cryptography in N⁢C0𝑁superscript𝐶0NC^{0}italic_N italic_C start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. In 45th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pages 166–175, 2004.
  2. Nearly d𝑑ditalic_d-linear convergence bounds for diffusion models via stochastic localization, 2024.
  3. Stable video diffusion: Scaling latent video diffusion models to large datasets, 2023.
  4. Generative modeling with denoising auto-encoders and langevin sampling. ArXiv, abs/2002.00107, 2020.
  5. Sampling is as easy as learning the score: theory for diffusion models with minimal data assumptions. In The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations, 2023.
  6. Diffusion posterior sampling for general noisy inverse problems. In The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations, 2023.
  7. Wavegrad: Estimating gradients for waveform generation. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2021.
  8. Diffusion models beat gans on image synthesis. In M. Ranzato, A. Beygelzimer, Y. Dauphin, P.S. Liang, and J. Wortman Vaughan, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 34, pages 8780–8794. Curran Associates, Inc., 2021.
  9. Diffusion posterior sampling for linear inverse problem solving: A filtering perspective. In The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations, 2024.
  10. Finite-sample maximum likelihood estimation of location. In S. Koyejo, S. Mohamed, A. Agarwal, D. Belgrave, K. Cho, and A. Oh, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 35, pages 30139–30149. Curran Associates, Inc., 2022.
  11. Sample-efficient training for diffusion, 2023.
  12. Denoising diffusion probabilistic models. In H. Larochelle, M. Ranzato, R. Hadsell, M.F. Balcan, and H. Lin, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 33, pages 6840–6851. Curran Associates, Inc., 2020.
  13. Video diffusion models, 2022.
  14. Robust compressed sensing mri with deep generative priors. In M. Ranzato, A. Beygelzimer, Y. Dauphin, P.S. Liang, and J. Wortman Vaughan, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 34, pages 14938–14954. Curran Associates, Inc., 2021.
  15. Fairness for image generation with uncertain sensitive attributes. In Marina Meila and Tong Zhang, editors, Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Machine Learning, volume 139 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, pages 4721–4732. PMLR, 18–24 Jul 2021.
  16. Denoising diffusion restoration models. In Alice H. Oh, Alekh Agarwal, Danielle Belgrave, and Kyunghyun Cho, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2022.
  17. Diffwave: A versatile diffusion model for audio synthesis. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2021.
  18. SNIPS: Solving noisy inverse problems stochastically. In A. Beygelzimer, Y. Dauphin, P. Liang, and J. Wortman Vaughan, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2021.
  19. Repaint: Inpainting using denoising diffusion probabilistic models. 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 11451–11461, 2022.
  20. B. Laurent and Pascal Massart. Adaptive estimation of a quadratic functional by model selection. Annals of Statistics, 28, 10 2000.
  21. Foundations of machine learning. 2018.
  22. High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models. CoRR, abs/2112.10752, 2021.
  23. Hierarchical text-conditional image generation with clip latents, 2022.
  24. Deep unsupervised learning using nonequilibrium thermodynamics. In Francis Bach and David Blei, editors, Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Machine Learning, volume 37 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, pages 2256–2265, Lille, France, 07–09 Jul 2015. PMLR.
  25. Generative modeling by estimating gradients of the data distribution. In Neural Information Processing Systems, 2019.
  26. Denoising diffusion implicit models. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2021.
  27. Pseudoinverse-guided diffusion models for inverse problems. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2023.
  28. Practical and asymptotically exact conditional sampling in diffusion models. In ICML 2023 Workshop on Structured Probabilistic Inference & Generative Modeling, 2023.
  29. Diffusion probabilistic modeling of protein backbones in 3d for the motif-scaffolding problem. In The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations, 2023.
Citations (5)

Summary

  • The paper establishes that diffusion model posterior sampling is computationally intractable under basic cryptographic assumptions.
  • It demonstrates that any algorithm attempting posterior sampling requires superpolynomial time, contrasting with efficient unconditional sampling.
  • The findings urge a reassessment of current strategies and motivate the search for new algorithms to overcome inherent computational limitations.

Computational Intractability of Diffusion Posterior Sampling Under Cryptographic Assumptions

Introduction

The analysis of diffusion processes in the context of generative models, specifically posterior sampling, is critical in understanding the boundaries of these models' applications. This exploration is pertinent to tasks like inpainting, super-resolution, and MRI reconstruction, where one aims to recover original sample distributions from noisy measurements. Recent advancements in diffusion models have demonstrated impressive capabilities in unconditional sampling from complex distributions, notably image distributions. However, the efficiency and theoretical guaranties of these models in posterior sampling remain largely unexplored. This paper addresses the computational feasibility of posterior sampling in diffusion models under standard cryptographic assumptions, presenting a nuanced perspective on the limitations inherent to these methods.

Theoretical Contributions

In a significant theoretical contribution, this research establishes that posterior sampling, despite its utility, is computationally intractable in certain scenarios under fundamental cryptographic assumptions. The crux of the argument rests on the existence of one-way functions—a cornerstone in cryptography. The paper demonstrates that for any algorithm, attempting posterior sampling in the proposed scenario requires superpolynomial time, contrasting sharply with the polynomial-time efficiency observed in unconditional sampling contexts. Moreover, it posits that even if approximations of smoothed scores are provided, achieving fast and robust posterior sampling remains elusive. This revelation aligns with the stronger assumption that if certain one-way functions necessitate exponential time to invert, posterior sampling's computational demands scale similarly, underscoring an intrinsic complexity that challenges current algorithmic approaches.

Practical Implications

From a practical standpoint, the results underscore a fundamental limitation in leveraging diffusion models for posterior sampling tasks. Given diffusion models' growing prominence in generating high-fidelity samples for a broad range of applications, recognizing these computational boundaries is crucial. This understanding prompts a reevaluation of current strategies and encourages the search for novel algorithms or theoretical frameworks that can accommodate or circumvent these limitations. The identification of distributional properties that could mitigate the computational intractability presents an intriguing avenue for future research.

Speculations on Future Directions

This work invites further scholarly pursuit in several directions. Principally, it opens up a dialogue on the nature of distributions for which posterior sampling might be feasible without encountering the prohibitive computational overhead identified. Investigating alternative algorithmic strategies or modified diffusion models that could offer more favorable computational properties for posterior sampling also presents an interesting challenge. Moreover, the exploration of practical approximations that, while not fully accurate, could provide sufficient efficacy for specific applications warrants attention. Further cryptographic analysis could also reveal more about the relationship between diffusion models' capabilities and foundational cryptographic principles.

Concluding Remarks

In summary, this research furnishes critical insights into the computational landscape of diffusion models, particularly highlighting a significant bottleneck in posterior sampling. By framing this limitation within the context of established cryptographic assumptions, it not only delineates the boundaries of current methodologies but also lays the groundwork for a nuanced understanding and future exploration of generative models. As the field continues to evolve, addressing the dichotomy between theoretical intractability and practical necessity will undoubtedly shape the trajectory of research and applications in artificial intelligence and machine learning.