Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
125 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
47 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Connection-Aware P2P Trading: Simultaneous Trading and Peer Selection (2402.11769v2)

Published 19 Feb 2024 in eess.SY, cs.GT, cs.SY, and math.OC

Abstract: Peer-to-peer (P2P) trading is seen as a viable solution to handle the growing number of distributed energy resources in distribution networks. However, when dealing with large-scale consumers, there are several challenges that must be addressed. One of these challenges is limited communication capabilities. Additionally, prosumers may have specific preferences when it comes to trading. Both can result in serious asynchrony in peer-to-peer trading, potentially impacting the effectiveness of negotiations and hindering convergence before the market closes. This paper introduces a connection-aware P2P trading algorithm designed for extensive prosumer trading. The algorithm facilitates asynchronous trading while respecting prosumer's autonomy in trading peer selection, an often overlooked aspect in traditional models. In addition, to optimize the use of limited connection opportunities, a smart trading peer connection selection strategy is developed to guide consumers to communicate strategically to accelerate convergence. A theoretical convergence guarantee is provided for the connection-aware P2P trading algorithm, which further details how smart selection strategies enhance convergence efficiency. Numerical studies are carried out to validate the effectiveness of the connection-aware algorithm and the performance of smart selection strategies in reducing the overall convergence time.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (32)
  1. W. Tushar, T. K. Saha, C. Yuen, D. Smith, and H. V. Poor, “Peer-to-peer trading in electricity networks: An overview,” IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 3185–3200, 2020.
  2. H. Sheng, C. Wang, X. Dong, K. Meng, and Z. Dong, “Incorporating P2P Trading Into DSO’s Decision-Making: A DSO-Prosumers Cooperated scheduling framework for transactive distribution system,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 2362–2375, 2023.
  3. C. Feng, B. Liang, Z. Li, W. Liu, and F. Wen, “Peer-to-peer energy trading under network constraints based on generalized fast dual ascent,” IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 1441–1453, 2023.
  4. F. Moret, T. Baroche, E. Sorin, and P. Pinson, “Negotiation algorithms for peer-to-peer electricity markets: Computational properties,” in 2018 Power Systems Computation Conference (PSCC), 2018, pp. 1–7.
  5. K. Umer, Q. Huang, M. Khorasany, M. Afzal, and W. Amin, “A novel communication efficient peer-to-peer energy trading scheme for enhanced privacy in microgrids,” Applied Energy, vol. 296, p. 117075, 2021.
  6. T. Sousa, T. Soares, P. Pinson, F. Moret, T. Baroche, and E. Sorin, “Peer-to-peer and community-based markets: A comprehensive review,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 104, pp. 367–378, 2019.
  7. D. H. Nguyen, “Optimal solution analysis and decentralized mechanisms for peer-to-peer energy markets,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 1470–1481, 2021.
  8. K. Anoh, S. Maharjan, A. Ikpehai, Y. Zhang, and B. Adebisi, “Energy peer-to-peer trading in virtual microgrids in smart grids: A game-theoretic approach,” IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 1264–1275, 2019.
  9. Y. Xia, Q. Xu, Y. Huang, Y. Liu, and F. Li, “Preserving privacy in nested peer-to-peer energy trading in networked microgrids considering incomplete rationality,” IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 606–622, 2022.
  10. J. Guerrero, A. C. Chapman, and G. Verbic, “Decentralized P2P energy trading under network constraints in a low-voltage network,” IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 5163–5173, 2019.
  11. M. H. Ullah and J.-D. Park, “Peer-to-peer energy trading in transactive markets considering physical network constraints,” IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 3390–3403, 2021.
  12. M. Yan, M. Shahidehpour, A. Paaso, L. Zhang, A. Alabdulwahab, and A. Abusorrah, “Distribution network-constrained optimization of peer-to-peer transactive energy trading among multi-microgrids,” IEEE transactions on smart grid, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 1033–1047, 2020.
  13. K. J. and D. Y., “A P2P-dominant distribution system architecture,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 2716–2725, 2020.
  14. S. Cui, Y.-W. Wang, Y. Shi, and J.-W. Xiao, “An efficient peer-to-peer energy-sharing framework for numerous community prosumers,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, vol. 16, no. 12, pp. 7402–7412, 2020.
  15. J. Li, Y. Ye, D. Papadaskalopoulos, and G. Strbac, “Computationally efficient pricing and benefit distribution mechanisms for incentivizing stable peer-to-peer energy trading,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 734–749, 2021.
  16. L. P. M. I. Sampath, A. Paudel, H. D. Nguyen, E. Y. Foo, and H. B. Gooi, “Peer-to-peer energy trading enabled optimal decentralized operation of smart distribution grids,” IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 654–666, 2021.
  17. W. Tushar, T. K. Saha, C. Yuen, M. I. Azim, T. Morstyn, H. V. Poor, D. Niyato, and R. Bean, “A coalition formation game framework for peer-to-peer energy trading,” Applied Energy, vol. 261, p. 114436, 2020.
  18. M. Khorasany, A. Paudel, R. Razzaghi, and P. Siano, “A new method for peer matching and negotiation of prosumers in peer-to-peer energy markets,” IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 2472–2483, 2021.
  19. Y. Chen, Y. Yang, and X. Xu, “Towards transactive energy: An analysis of information-related practical issues,” Energy Conversion and Economics, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 112–121, 2022.
  20. A. Dong, T. Baroche, R. Le Goff Latimier, and H. Ben Ahmed, “Convergence analysis of an asynchronous peer-to-peer market with communication delays,” Sustainable Energy, Grids and Networks, vol. 26, p. 100475, 2021.
  21. W. Liu, Y. Xu, J. Liu, W. Yin, Y. Hou, and Z. Yang, “Energy and reserve sharing considering uncertainty and communication resources,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 10, no. 14, pp. 12 627–12 637, 2023.
  22. X. Li, C. Li, X. Liu, G. Chen, and Z. Y. Dong, “Two-stage community energy trading under end-edge-cloud orchestration,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 1961–1972, 2023.
  23. Y. Liu, W. Xu, G. Wu, Z. Tian, and Q. Ling, “Communication-censored ADMM for decentralized consensus optimization,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 67, no. 10, pp. 2565–2579, 2019.
  24. M. H. Ullah and J. D. Park, “Peer-to-peer local energy trading with voltage management under asynchronous communication,” IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 4969–4972, 2022.
  25. Z. Guo, P. Pinson, Q. Wu, S. Chen, Q. Yang, and Z. Yang, “An asynchronous online negotiation mechanism for real-time peer-to-peer electricity markets,” IEEE transactions on power systems, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 1868–1880, 2021.
  26. S. Li, J. Lian, A. J. Conejo, and W. Zhang, “Transactive energy systems: The market-based coordination of distributed energy resources,” IEEE Control Systems Magazine, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 26–52, 2020.
  27. Z. Wang, F. Liu, Z. Ma, Y. Chen, M. Jia, W. Wei, and Q. Wu, “Distributed generalized Nash equilibrium seeking for energy sharing games in prosumers,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 3973–3986, 2021.
  28. W. Ananduta and S. Grammatico, “Equilibrium seeking and optimal selection algorithms in peer-to-peer energy markets,” Games, vol. 13, no. 5, p. 66, 2022.
  29. M. Hong, X. Wang, M. Razaviyayn, and Z.-Q. Luo, “Iteration complexity analysis of block coordinate descent methods,” Mathematical Programming, vol. 163, no. 1, pp. 85–114, 2017.
  30. M. Bianchi, W. Ananduta, and S. Grammatico, “The distributed dual ascent algorithm is robust to asynchrony,” IEEE Control Systems Letters, vol. 6, pp. 650–655, 2022.
  31. Y. Su, Z. Wang, M. Cao, M. Jia, and F. Liu, “Convergence analysis of dual decomposition algorithm in distributed optimization: Asynchrony and inexactness,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 2022.
  32. J. Nutini, M. Schmidt, I. Laradji, M. Friedlander, and H. Koepke, “Coordinate descent converges faster with the gauss-southwell rule than random selection,” in International Conference on Machine Learning.   PMLR, 2015, pp. 1632–1641.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Summarize Now
X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets