Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
110 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
56 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
44 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Numerical analysis of physics-informed neural networks and related models in physics-informed machine learning (2402.10926v1)

Published 30 Jan 2024 in math.NA, cs.LG, and cs.NA

Abstract: Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) and their variants have been very popular in recent years as algorithms for the numerical simulation of both forward and inverse problems for partial differential equations. This article aims to provide a comprehensive review of currently available results on the numerical analysis of PINNs and related models that constitute the backbone of physics-informed machine learning. We provide a unified framework in which analysis of the various components of the error incurred by PINNs in approximating PDEs can be effectively carried out. A detailed review of available results on approximation, generalization and training errors and their behavior with respect to the type of the PDE and the dimension of the underlying domain is presented. In particular, the role of the regularity of the solutions and their stability to perturbations in the error analysis is elucidated. Numerical results are also presented to illustrate the theory. We identify training errors as a key bottleneck which can adversely affect the overall performance of various models in physics-informed machine learning.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (2)
User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (2)
  1. Tim De Ryck (12 papers)
  2. Siddhartha Mishra (76 papers)
Citations (3)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.