Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
169 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Repurposing Coal Power Plants into Thermal Energy Storage for Supporting Zero-carbon Data Centers (2402.09675v1)

Published 15 Feb 2024 in eess.SY and cs.SY

Abstract: Coal power plants will need to be phased out and face stranded asset risks under the net-zero energy system transition. Repurposing coal power plants could recoup profits and reduce carbon emissions using the existing infrastructure and grid connections. This paper investigates a retrofitting strategy that turns coal power plants into thermal energy storage (TES) and zero-carbon data centers (DCs). The proposed capacity expansion model considers the co-locations of DCs, local renewablewith the system-generation, andlevel coal retir energy storage ement and retrofitting. We optimize the DC system configurations under the hourly-matching carbon policy and flexible operations. Results show that under hourly-matching carbon constraints, the retrofitted TES could complement the operations of lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) to reduce system costs. This could render DCs with optimal co-located renewable generations and energy storage more cost-effective than unconstrained DCs.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (24)
  1. EIA, “Capacity Factors for Utility Scale Generators Primarily Using Fossil Fuels,” May 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.eia.gov/electricity/monthly
  2. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Electricity market and policy, “Queued Up: Characteristics of Power Plants Seeking Transmission Interconnection,” 2022. [Online]. Available: https://emp.lbl.gov/queues
  3. Q. Yong, Y. Tian, X. Qian, and X. Li, “Retrofitting coal-fired power plants for grid energy storage by coupling with thermal energy storage,” Applied Thermal Engineering, vol. 215, p. 119048, Oct. 2022.
  4. J. Hansen, W. Jenson, A. Wrobel, N. Stauff, K. Biegel, T. Kim, R. Belles, and F. Omitaomu, “Investigating Benefits and Challenges of Converting Retiring Coal Plants into Nuclear Plants,” Tech. Rep. INL/RPT-22-67964-Rev000, 1886660, Sep. 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1886660/
  5. Andrew Coffman Smith, “Plan unveiled to repurpose New York’s 2 coal plant sites for data centers,” Sep. 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.spglobal.com/marketintelligence/en/news-insights/trending/6⁢U⁢9⁢J⁢J⁢Y⁢t⁢i⁢NG⁢7⁢Z⁢o⁢3−a⁢3⁢u⁢Y⁢T⁢Q⁢26𝑈9𝐽𝐽𝑌𝑡𝑖subscript𝑁𝐺7𝑍𝑜3𝑎3𝑢𝑌𝑇𝑄26U9JJYtiN_{G}7Zo3-a3uYTQ26 italic_U 9 italic_J italic_J italic_Y italic_t italic_i italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_G end_POSTSUBSCRIPT 7 italic_Z italic_o 3 - italic_a 3 italic_u italic_Y italic_T italic_Q 2
  6. N. A. Sepulveda, J. D. Jenkins, A. Edington, D. S. Mallapragada, and R. K. Lester, “The design space for long-duration energy storage in decarbonized power systems,” Nature Energy, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 506–516, Mar. 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41560-021-00796-8
  7. P. Albertus, J. S. Manser, and S. Litzelman, “Long-Duration Electricity Storage Applications, Economics, and Technologies,” Joule, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 21–32, Jan. 2020. [Online]. Available: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2542435119305392
  8. E. Masanet, A. Shehabi, N. Lei, S. Smith, and J. Koomey, “Recalibrating global data center energy-use estimates,” Science, vol. 367, no. 6481, pp. 984–986, Feb. 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.aba3758
  9. N. Jones, “How to stop data centres from gobbling up the world’s electricity,” Nature, vol. 561, no. 7722, pp. 163–166, Sep. 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-06610-y
  10. D. Mytton and M. Ashtine, “Sources of data center energy estimates: A comprehensive review,” Joule, vol. 6, no. 9, pp. 2032–2056, Sep. 2022. [Online]. Available: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2542435122003580
  11. Michael Giovanniello, Anna Cybulsky, Tim Schittekatte, and Dharik S. Mallapragada, “Producing hydrogen from electricity: How modeling additionality drives the emissions impact of time-matching requirements,” Jan. 2023. [Online]. Available: https://energy.mit.edu/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/MITEI-WP-2023-02.pdf
  12. Google Data Center, “24/7 Carbon-Free Energy by 2030.” [Online]. Available: https://sustainability.google/progress/energy/
  13. J. Zheng, A. A. Chien, and S. Suh, “Mitigating Curtailment and Carbon Emissions through Load Migration between Data Centers,” Joule, vol. 4, no. 10, pp. 2208–2222, Oct. 2020. [Online]. Available: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2542435120303470
  14. L. Lin and A. A. Chien, “Adapting Datacenter Capacity for Greener Datacenters and Grid,” in Proceedings of the 14th ACM International Conference on Future Energy Systems.   Orlando FL USA: ACM, Jun. 2023, pp. 200–213. [Online]. Available: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3575813.3595197
  15. K. M. U. Ahmed, M. H. J. Bollen, and M. Alvarez, “A Review of Data Centers Energy Consumption and Reliability Modeling,” IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 152 536–152 563, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9599719/
  16. W. E. Gnibga, A. Blavette, and A.-C. Orgerie, “Renewable Energy in Data Centers: the Dilemma of Electrical Grid Dependency and Autonomy Costs,” IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Computing, pp. 1–13, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10227588/
  17. Y. Ding, “GenX retrofitting module.” [Online]. Available: https://github.com/GenXProject/GenX/tree/GenX_retrofit_MIT
  18. G. He, Q. Chen, C. Kang, and Q. Xia, “Optimal Offering Strategy for Concentrating Solar Power Plants in Joint Energy, Reserve and Regulation Markets,” IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 1245–1254, Jul. 2016. [Online]. Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7437454/
  19. I. Staffell and S. Pfenninger, “Using bias-corrected reanalysis to simulate current and future wind power output,” Energy, vol. 114, pp. 1224–1239, Nov. 2016. [Online]. Available: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0360544216311811
  20. US Energy Information Administration, “Coal-fired electric power plants.” [Online]. Available: https://www.eia.gov/coal/data.php#prices
  21. Baxtel, “Texas Data Center Map.” [Online]. Available: https://baxtel.com/data-center/texas
  22. Joshua D. Rhodes, Thomas Deetjen, and Caitlin Smith, “Impacts of Large, Flexible Data Center Operations on the Future of ERCOT,” Jun. 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.ideasmiths.net/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/LANCIUM_IS_ERCOT_flexDC_FINAL_2021.pdf
  23. EIA, “Capital Cost and Performance Characteristic Estimates for Utility Scale Electric Power Generating Technologies,” Feb. 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.eia.gov/analysis/studies/powerplants/capitalcost/pdf/capital_cost_ AEO2020.pdf
  24. “Supplement material.” [Online]. Available: https://github.com/yifueve/coalrepurpose

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.