Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
144 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
46 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

The Limits of Price Discrimination Under Privacy Constraints (2402.08223v4)

Published 13 Feb 2024 in econ.TH and cs.GT

Abstract: We study a producer's problem of selling a product to a continuum of privacy-conscious consumers, where the producer can implement third-degree price discrimination, offering different prices to different market segments. We consider a privacy mechanism that provides a degree of protection by probabilistically masking each market segment. We establish that the resultant set of all consumer-producer utilities forms a convex polygon, characterized explicitly as a linear mapping of a certain high-dimensional convex polytope into $\mathbb{R}2$. This characterization enables us to investigate the impact of the privacy mechanism on both producer and consumer utilities. In particular, we establish that the privacy constraint always hurts the producer by reducing both the maximum and minimum utility achievable. From the consumer's perspective, although the privacy mechanism ensures an increase in the minimum utility compared to the non-private scenario, interestingly, it may reduce the maximum utility. Finally, we demonstrate that increasing the privacy level does not necessarily intensify these effects. For instance, the maximum utility for the producer or the minimum utility for the consumer may exhibit nonmonotonic behavior in response to an increase of the privacy level.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (36)
  1. Too much data: Prices and inefficiencies in data markets. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics:Micro, 2022.
  2. How good are privacy guarantees? platform architecture and violation of user privacy. Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research, 2023a.
  3. A model of behavioral manipulation. Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research, 2023b.
  4. The economics of privacy. Journal of Economic Literature, 54(2):442–492, 2016.
  5. Monopoly price discrimination and demand curvature. American Economic Review, 100(4):1601–1615, 2010.
  6. Voluntary disclosure and personalized pricing. In Proceedings of the 21st ACM Conference on Economics and Computation, pages 537–538, 2020.
  7. Robust price discrimination. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.16942, 2024.
  8. Fair price discrimination. In Proceedings of the 2024 Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA), pages 2679–2703. SIAM, 2024.
  9. The limits of price discrimination. American Economic Review, 105(3):921–957, 2015.
  10. The economics of social data. arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.03107, 2020.
  11. A unified approach to second and third degree price discrimination. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.12366, 2024.
  12. D. P. Bertsekas. Nonlinear programming. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 48(3):334–334, 1997.
  13. S. Cowan. Welfare-increasing third-degree price discrimination. The RAND Journal of Economics, 47(2):326–340, 2016.
  14. Our data, ourselves: Privacy via distributed noise generation. In Advances in Cryptology-EUROCRYPT 2006: 24th Annual International Conference on the Theory and Applications of Cryptographic Techniques, St. Petersburg, Russia, May 28-June 1, 2006. Proceedings 25, pages 486–503. Springer, 2006a.
  15. Calibrating noise to sensitivity in private data analysis. In Theory of Cryptography: Third Theory of Cryptography Conference, TCC 2006, New York, NY, USA, March 4-7, 2006. Proceedings 3, pages 265–284. Springer, 2006b.
  16. The algorithmic foundations of differential privacy. Foundations and Trends® in Theoretical Computer Science, 9(3–4):211–407, 2014.
  17. Market segmentation through information. Available at SSRN 3432315, 2021.
  18. Rappor: Randomized aggregatable privacy-preserving ordinal response. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security, pages 1054–1067, 2014.
  19. The unrelated question randomized response model: Theoretical framework. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 64(326):520–539, 1969.
  20. N. Haghpanah and J. Hartline. When is pure bundling optimal? The Review of Economic Studies, 88(3):1127–1156, 2021.
  21. N. Haghpanah and R. Siegel. The limits of multiproduct price discrimination. American Economic Review: Insights, 4(4):443–458, 2022.
  22. N. Haghpanah and R. Siegel. Pareto-improving segmentation of multiproduct markets. Journal of Political Economy, 131(6):000–000, 2023.
  23. N. Haghpapanah and R. Siegel. Consumer-optimal market segmentation. In Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Conference on Economics and Computation, pages 241–242, 2019.
  24. S. Hidir and N. Vellodi. Privacy, personalization, and price discrimination. Journal of the European Economic Association, 19(2):1342–1363, 2021.
  25. S. Ichihashi. Online privacy and information disclosure by consumers. American Economic Review, 110(2):569–595, 2020.
  26. C. I. Jones and C. Tonetti. Nonrivalry and the economics of data. American Economic Review, 110(9):2819–2858, 2020.
  27. E. Kamenica and M. Gentzkow. Bayesian persuasion. American Economic Review, 101(6):2590–2615, 2011.
  28. S.-H. Ko and K. Munagala. Optimal price discrimination for randomized mechanisms. In Proceedings of the 23rd ACM Conference on Economics and Computation, pages 477–496, 2022.
  29. P. Milgrom and I. Segal. Envelope theorems for arbitrary choice sets. Econometrica, 70(2):583–601, 2002.
  30. E. Posner and E. Weyl. Radical Markets: Uprooting Capitalism and Democracy for a Just Society. Princeton University Press, 2018.
  31. B. Rassouli and D. Gündüz. Optimal utility-privacy trade-off with total variation distance as a privacy measure. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, 15:594–603, 2019.
  32. J. Robinson. The Economics of Imperfect Competition. Springer, 1969.
  33. A.-K. Roesler and B. Szentes. Buyer-optimal learning and monopoly pricing. American Economic Review, 107(7):2072–2080, 2017.
  34. R. Schmalensee. Output and welfare implications of monopolistic third-degree price discrimination. The American Economic Review, 71(1):242–247, 1981.
  35. H. R. Varian. Price discrimination and social welfare. The American Economic Review, 75(4):870–875, 1985.
  36. S. L. Warner. Randomized response: A survey technique for eliminating evasive answer bias. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 60(309):63–69, 1965.
Citations (2)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.