Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
119 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
56 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

AIR-Bench: Benchmarking Large Audio-Language Models via Generative Comprehension (2402.07729v2)

Published 12 Feb 2024 in eess.AS, cs.CL, cs.LG, and cs.SD

Abstract: Recently, instruction-following audio-LLMs have received broad attention for human-audio interaction. However, the absence of benchmarks capable of evaluating audio-centric interaction capabilities has impeded advancements in this field. Previous models primarily focus on assessing different fundamental tasks, such as Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR), and lack an assessment of the open-ended generative capabilities centered around audio. Thus, it is challenging to track the progression in the Large Audio-LLMs (LALMs) domain and to provide guidance for future improvement. In this paper, we introduce AIR-Bench (\textbf{A}udio \textbf{I}nst\textbf{R}uction \textbf{Bench}mark), the first benchmark designed to evaluate the ability of LALMs to understand various types of audio signals (including human speech, natural sounds, and music), and furthermore, to interact with humans in the textual format. AIR-Bench encompasses two dimensions: \textit{foundation} and \textit{chat} benchmarks. The former consists of 19 tasks with approximately 19k single-choice questions, intending to inspect the basic single-task ability of LALMs. The latter one contains 2k instances of open-ended question-and-answer data, directly assessing the comprehension of the model on complex audio and its capacity to follow instructions. Both benchmarks require the model to generate hypotheses directly. We design a unified framework that leverages advanced LLMs, such as GPT-4, to evaluate the scores of generated hypotheses given the meta-information of the audio. Experimental results demonstrate a high level of consistency between GPT-4-based evaluation and human evaluation. By revealing the limitations of existing LALMs through evaluation results, AIR-Bench can provide insights into the direction of future research.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (11)
  1. Qian Yang (146 papers)
  2. Jin Xu (131 papers)
  3. Wenrui Liu (11 papers)
  4. Yunfei Chu (15 papers)
  5. Ziyue Jiang (38 papers)
  6. Xiaohuan Zhou (13 papers)
  7. Yichong Leng (27 papers)
  8. Yuanjun Lv (12 papers)
  9. Zhou Zhao (219 papers)
  10. Chang Zhou (105 papers)
  11. Jingren Zhou (198 papers)
Citations (25)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com