Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
140 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
46 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Continuous-Variable Quantum Key Distribution with key rates far above the PLOB bound (2402.04770v2)

Published 7 Feb 2024 in quant-ph and cs.CR

Abstract: Continuous-Variable Quantum Key Distribution (CVQKD) at large distances has such high noise levels that the error-correcting code must have very low rate. In this regime it becomes feasible to implement random-codebook error correction, which is known to perform close to capacity. We propose a reverse reconciliation scheme for CVQKD in which the first step is advantage distillation based on random-codebook error correction operated above the Shannon limit. Our scheme has a novel way of achieving statistical decoupling between the public reconciliation data and the secret key. We provide an analysis of the secret key rate for the case of Gaussian collective attacks, and we present numerical results. The best performance is obtained when the message size exceeds the mutual information $I(X;Y)$ between Alice's quadratures $X$ and Bob's measurements $Y$, i.e. the Shannon limit. This somewhat counter-intuitive result is understood from a tradeoff between code rate and frame rejection rate, combined with the fact that error correction for QKD needs to reconcile only random data. We obtain secret key rates that lie far above the Devetak-Winter value $I(X;Y) - I(E;Y)$, which is the upper bound in the case of one-way error correction. Furthermore, our key rates lie above the PLOB bound for Continuous-Variable detection, but below the PLOB bound for Discrete-Variable detection.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (18)
  1. Repeat-Accumulate codes for reconciliation in Continuous Variable Quantum Key Distribution. In 2016 Australian Communications Theory Workshop (AusCTW), pages 18–23.
  2. Key reconciliation with Low-Density Parity-Check codes for long-distance quantum cryptography. 2017. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1702.07740.pdf.
  3. High speed reconciliation for CVQKD based on spatially coupled LDPC codes. IEEE Photon. J., 10:1–10, 2018.
  4. Comprehensive high-speed reconciliation for continuous-variable quantum key distribution. Quantum Information Processing, 19, 2020. Article number 320.
  5. A novel error correction protocol for continuous variable quantum key distribution. Scientific Reports, 11, 2021. article number 10465.
  6. P. Jouguet and S. Kunz-Jacques. High performance error correction for quantum key distribution using polar codes. Quantum Information & Computation, 14(3-4):329–338, 2014.
  7. Rate-adaptive reconciliation with polar coding for continuous-variable quantum key distribution. Quantum Information Processing, 20, 2021. Article number 318.
  8. Information reconciliation of continuous-variables quantum key distribution: principles, implementations and applications. EPJ Quantum Technology, 10, 2023. article number 40.
  9. Multidimensional reconciliation for a continuous-variable quantum key distribution. Phys.Rev.A, 77:042325, 2008.
  10. Reconciliation of a quantum-distributed Gaussian key. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 50(2):394–400, 2004.
  11. On the problem of non-zero word error rates for fixed-rate error correction codes in continuous variable quantum key distribution. New J. of Physics, 19:023003, 2017.
  12. Anthony Leverrier. Theoretical study of continuous-variable quantum key distribution. Phd thesis, Télécom ParisTech, November 2009.
  13. I. Devetak and A. Winter. Distillation of secret key and entanglement from quantum states. Proc.R.Soc.A, 461:207–235, 2005.
  14. A. Marie and R. Alléaume. Self-coherent phase reference sharing for continuous-variable quantum key distribution. Phys.Rev.A, 95:012316, 2017.
  15. Ü. Maurer. Secret key agreement by public discussion from common information. IEE Trans. on Information Theory, pages 733–742, 1993.
  16. N.M. Temme. Asymptotic and numerical aspects of the noncentral chi-square distribution. Computers Math. Applic., 25(5):55–63, 1993.
  17. S. Vigna. Further scramblings of Marsaglia’s xorshift generators. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 315:175–181, 2017.
  18. MWC256 algorithm. https://prng.di.unimi.it/.
Citations (2)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com