Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
133 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
46 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

The Role of Child Gender in the Formation of Parents' Social Networks (2402.04474v1)

Published 6 Feb 2024 in econ.GN and q-fin.EC

Abstract: Social networks play an important role in various aspects of life. While extensive research has explored factors such as gender, race, and education in network formation, one dimension that has received less attention is the gender of one's child. Children tend to form friendships with same-gender peers, potentially leading their parents to interact based on their child's gender. Focusing on households with children aged 3-5, we leverage a rich dataset from rural Bangladesh to investigate the role of children's gender in parental network formation. We estimate an equilibrium model of network formation that considers a child's gender alongside other socioeconomic factors. Counterfactual analyses reveal that children's gender significantly shapes parents' network structure. Specifically, if all children share the same gender, households would have approximately 15% more links, with a stronger effect for families having girls. Importantly, the impact of children's gender on network structure is on par with or even surpasses that of factors such as income distribution, parental occupation, education, and age. These findings carry implications for debates surrounding coed versus single-sex schools, as well as policies that foster inter-gender social interactions among children.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (40)
  1. Atchadé, Yves F and Jeffrey S Rosenthal, “On adaptive Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithms,” Bernoulli, 2005, 11 (5), 815–828.
  2. Banerjee, Abhijit, Arun G Chandrasekhar, Esther Duflo, and Matthew O. Jackson, “The diffusion of microfinance,” Science, 2013, 341 (6144), 1236498.
  3.   , Emily Breza, Arun G Chandrasekhar, Esther Duflo, Matthew O Jackson, and Cynthia Kinnan, “Changes in social network structure in response to exposure to formal credit markets,” Review of Economic Studies, forthcoming, 2023.
  4. Booth, A., L. Cardona-Sosa, and P. Nolen, “Gender differences in risk aversion: Do single-sex environments affect their development?,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 2014, 99 (C), 126–154.
  5. Boucher, Vincent, “Structural homophily,” International Economic Review, 2015, 56 (1), 235–264.
  6.    and Ismael Mourifié, “My friend far, far away: a random field approach to exponential random graph models,” The Econometrics Journal, 2017, 20 (3), S14–S46.
  7.   , Carlo L Del Bello, Fabrizio Panebianco, Thierry Verdier, and Yves Zenou, “Education transmission and network formation,” Journal of Labor Economics, 2023, 41 (1), 129–173.
  8.   , S. Tumen, M. Vlassopoulos, J. Wahba, and Y. Zenou, “Ethnic mixing in early childhood: Evidence from a randomized field experiment and a structural model,” 2021. CEPR Discussion Paper #15528.
  9. Breza, Emily, “Field experiments, social networks, and development,” In: Y. Bramoullé, A. Galeotti and B.W. Rogers (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the Economics of Networks, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.
  10.    and Arun G Chandrasekhar, “Social networks, reputation, and commitment: Evidence from a savings monitors experiment,” Econometrica, 2019, 87 (1), 175–216.
  11.   , Arun Chandrasekhar, Benjamin Golub, and Aneesha Parvathaneni, “Networks in economic development,” Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 2019, 35 (4), 678–721.
  12. Chandrasekhar, Arun, “Econometrics of network formation,” In: Y. Bramoullé, A. Galeotti and B.W. Rogers (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the Economics of Networks, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016, pp. 303–357.
  13. Christakis, Nicholas, James Fowler, Guido W Imbens, and Karthik Kalyanaraman, “An empirical model for strategic network formation,” In: Graham, Bryan S. and De Paula, Aureo (Eds.), The Econometric Analysis of Network Data, New York: Academic Press, 2020.
  14. Currarini, Sergio, Matthew O. Jackson, and Paolo Pin, “An economic model of friendship: Homophily, minorities, and segregation,” Econometrica, 2009, 77 (4), 1003–1045.
  15. Doepke, Matthias, Giuseppe Sorrenti, and Fabrizio Zilibotti, “The economics of parenting,” Annual Review of Economics, 2019, 11, 55–84.
  16. Eisenkopf, G., Z. Hessami, U. Fischbacher, and H.W. Ursprung, “Academic performance and single-sex schooling: Evidence from a natural experiment in Switzerland,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 2015, 115 (C), 123–143.
  17. Fafchamps, Marcel and Flore Gubert, “The formation of risk sharing networks,” Journal of Development Economics, 2007, 83 (2), 326–350.
  18.    and Susan Lund, “Risk-sharing networks in rural Philippines,” Journal of Development Economics, 2003, 71 (2), 261–287.
  19. Graham, Bryan S., “Methods of identification in social networks,” Annual Review of Economics, 2015, 7, 65–485.
  20.   , “An econometric model of network formation with degree heterogeneity,” Econometrica, 2017, 85 (4), 1033–1063.
  21. Guo, Keyu, Asad Islam, John List, Michael Vlassopoulos, and Yves Zenou, “Early Childhood Education, Parent Social Networks, and Child Development,” 2023. Unpublished working paper.
  22. Hahn, Y., A. Islam, E. Patacchini, and Y. Zenou, “Friendship and female education: Evidence from a field experiment in Bangladeshi primary schools,” Economic Journal, 2020, 130, 740–764.
  23. Heizler, Odelia and Ayal Kimhi, “The role of children in building parents’ social networks,” In: Joan Costa-Font and Mario Macis (Eds.), Social Economics: Current and Emerging Issues, Cambridge: MIT Press, 2017, pp. 283–304.
  24. Hsieh, Chih-Sheng, Michael D König, and Xiaodong Liu, “A structural model for the coevolution of networks and behavior,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 2022, 104 (2), 355–367.
  25. Jackson, Matthew O, Brian W Rogers, and Yves Zenou, “The economic consequences of social-network structure,” Journal of Economic Literature, 2017, 55 (1), 49–95.
  26. Leaper, Campbell, “Parents’ socialization of gender in children,” In: Tremblay, R.E, Boivin, M. and R. Peters (Eds.), Encyclopedia on Early Childhood Development [online], https://www.child-encyclopedia.com/gender-early-socialization/according-experts/parents-socialization-gender-children, 2014.
  27. Leung, Michael P, “Two-step estimation of network-formation models with incomplete information,” Journal of Econometrics, 2015, 188 (1), 182–195.
  28. Maccoby, Eleanor E and Carol Nagy Jacklin, “Gender segregation in childhood,” in “Advances in child development and behavior,” Vol. 20, Elsevier, 1987, pp. 239–287.
  29. Mael, F.A., M. Smith, A. Alonso, K. Rogers, and D. Gibson, “Theoretical arguments for and against single-sex schools: A critical analysis of the explanations,” Working Paper, Washington, DC: American Institutes for Research, 2004.
  30. McPherson, Miller, Lynn Smith-Lovin, and James M Cook, “Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks,” Annual Review of Sociology, 2001, 27 (1), 415–444.
  31. Mele, Angelo, “A structural model of dense network formation,” Econometrica, 2017, 85 (3), 825–850.
  32.   , “Does school desegregation promote diverse interactions? An equilibrium model of segregation within schools,” American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 2020, 12 (2), 228–257.
  33.   , “A structural model of homophily and clustering in social networks,” Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 2022, 40 (3), 1377–1389.
  34. Monderer, Dov and Lloyd S. Shapley, “Potential games,” Games and Economic Behavior, 1996, 14 (1), 124–143.
  35. Paula, Áureo De, “Econometrics of network models,” In: B. Honore, A. Pakes, M. Piazzesi and L. Samuelson (Eds.), Economics and Econometrics: Theory and Applications: Eleventh World Congress (Vol. 1), Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2017, p. 268–323.
  36.   , “Econometric models of network formation,” Annual Review of Economics, 2020, 12, 775–799.
  37. Spencer, S.J., C.M. Steele, and D.M. Quinn, “Stereotype threat and women’s math performance,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1999, 35 (1), 4–28.
  38. Sullivan, Alice, Heather Joshi, and Diana Leonard, “Single-Sex Schooling and Academic Attainment at School and Through the Lifecourse,” American Educational Research Journal, 2010, 47 (1), 6–36.
  39. Tamer, Elie, “Incomplete simultaneous discrete response model with multiple equilibria,” The Review of Economic Studies, 2003, 70 (1), 147–165.
  40. Weerdt, Joachim De and Stefan Dercon, “Risk-sharing networks and insurance against illness,” Journal of Development Economics, 2006, 81 (2), 337–356.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Summarize Now