Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
126 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
28 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
42 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Light and Optimal Schrödinger Bridge Matching (2402.03207v2)

Published 5 Feb 2024 in cs.LG

Abstract: Schr\"odinger Bridges (SB) have recently gained the attention of the ML community as a promising extension of classic diffusion models which is also interconnected to the Entropic Optimal Transport (EOT). Recent solvers for SB exploit the pervasive bridge matching procedures. Such procedures aim to recover a stochastic process transporting the mass between distributions given only a transport plan between them. In particular, given the EOT plan, these procedures can be adapted to solve SB. This fact is heavily exploited by recent works giving rise to matching-based SB solvers. The cornerstone here is recovering the EOT plan: recent works either use heuristical approximations (e.g., the minibatch OT) or establish iterative matching procedures which by the design accumulate the error during the training. We address these limitations and propose a novel procedure to learn SB which we call the \textbf{optimal Schr\"odinger bridge matching}. It exploits the optimal parameterization of the diffusion process and provably recovers the SB process \textbf{(a)} with a single bridge matching step and \textbf{(b)} with arbitrary transport plan as the input. Furthermore, we show that the optimal bridge matching objective coincides with the recently discovered energy-based modeling (EBM) objectives to learn EOT/SB. Inspired by this observation, we develop a light solver (which we call LightSB-M) to implement optimal matching in practice using the Gaussian mixture parameterization of the adjusted Schr\"odinger potential. We experimentally showcase the performance of our solver in a range of practical tasks. The code for our solver can be found at https://github.com/SKholkin/LightSB-Matching.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (45)
  1. Likelihood training of schr\\\backslash\” odinger bridge using forward-backward sdes theory. arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.11291, 2021.
  2. On the relation between optimal transport and schrödinger bridges: A stochastic control viewpoint. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 169:671–691, 2016.
  3. Cuturi, M. Sinkhorn distances: Lightspeed computation of optimal transport. Advances in neural information processing systems, 26, 2013.
  4. Score-based generative neural networks for large-scale optimal transport. Advances in neural information processing systems, 34:12955–12965, 2021.
  5. Diffusion schrödinger bridge with applications to score-based generative modeling. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 34:17695–17709, 2021.
  6. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the em algorithm. Journal of the royal statistical society: series B (methodological), 39(1):1–22, 1977.
  7. Pot: Python optimal transport. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 22(78):1–8, 2021. URL http://jmlr.org/papers/v22/20-451.html.
  8. Fortet, R. Résolution d’un système d’équations de m. schrödinger. Journal de Mathématiques Pures et Appliquées, 19(1-4):83–105, 1940.
  9. Stochastic optimization for large-scale optimal transport. In Advances in neural information processing systems, pp.  3440–3448, 2016.
  10. Sample complexity of sinkhorn divergences. In The 22nd international conference on artificial intelligence and statistics, pp.  1574–1583. PMLR, 2019.
  11. Entropic neural optimal transport via diffusion processes. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2023a.
  12. Building the bridge of schr\\\backslash\” odinger: A continuous entropic optimal transport benchmark. In Thirty-seventh Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems Datasets and Benchmarks Track, 2023b.
  13. Denoising diffusion probabilistic models. Advances in neural information processing systems, 33:6840–6851, 2020.
  14. A style-based generator architecture for generative adversarial networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp.  4401–4410, 2019.
  15. Unpaired image-to-image translation via neural schr\\\backslash\” odinger bridge. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.15086, 2023.
  16. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980, 2014.
  17. Stochastic differential equations. Springer, 1992.
  18. Light schr\\\backslash\” odinger bridge. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2024.
  19. Neural lagrangian schr\\\backslash\”{{\{{o}}\}} dinger bridge: Diffusion modeling for population dynamics. In The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations, 2022.
  20. Kullback, S. Probability densities with given marginals. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 39(4):1236–1243, 1968.
  21. A tutorial on energy-based learning. Predicting structured data, 1(0), 2006.
  22. Léonard, C. A survey of the schr\\\backslash\” odinger problem and some of its connections with optimal transport. arXiv preprint arXiv:1308.0215, 2013.
  23. Flow matching for generative modeling. In The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations, 2022.
  24. I22{}^{2}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPTsb: Image-to-image schr\\\backslash\” odinger bridge. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.05872, 2023a.
  25. Flow straight and fast: Learning to generate and transfer data with rectified flow. In The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations, 2022.
  26. Instaflow: One step is enough for high-quality diffusion-based text-to-image generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.06380, 2023b.
  27. Sdedit: Guided image synthesis and editing with stochastic differential equations. arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.01073, 2021.
  28. Energy-guided entropic neural optimal transport. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2024.
  29. On free energy, stochastic control, and schrödinger processes. In Modeling, Estimation and Control of Systems with Uncertainty: Proceedings of a Conference held in Sopron, Hungary, September 1990, pp.  334–348. Springer, 1991.
  30. Computational optimal transport. Foundations and Trends® in Machine Learning, 11(5-6):355–607, 2019.
  31. Adversarial latent autoencoders. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp.  14104–14113, 2020.
  32. 8 - brownian motion and related processes. In Pinsky, M. A. and Karlin, S. (eds.), An Introduction to Stochastic Modeling (Fourth Edition), pp.  391–446. Academic Press, Boston, fourth edition edition, 2011. ISBN 978-0-12-381416-6. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-381416-6.00008-3. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780123814166000083.
  33. Energy distance. wiley interdisciplinary reviews: Computational statistics, 8(1):27–38, 2016.
  34. High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp.  10684–10695, 2022.
  35. Ruschendorf, L. Convergence of the iterative proportional fitting procedure. The Annals of Statistics, pp.  1160–1174, 1995.
  36. Large-scale optimal transport and mapping estimation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.02283, 2017.
  37. Diffusion schr\\\backslash\” odinger bridge matching. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.16852, 2023.
  38. Aligned diffusion schr\\\backslash\” odinger bridges. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.11419, 2023.
  39. Consistency models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.01469, 2023.
  40. Simulation-free schr\\\backslash\” odinger bridges via score and flow matching. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.03672, 2023.
  41. Transport, variational inference and diffusions: with applications to annealed flows and schr\\\backslash\” odinger bridges. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.01050, 2023.
  42. Solving schrödinger bridges via maximum likelihood. Entropy, 23(9):1134, 2021.
  43. Villani, C. Optimal transport: old and new, volume 338. Springer Science & Business Media, 2008.
  44. Diffusion-gan: Training gans with diffusion. In The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations, 2022.
  45. Unpaired image-to-image translation using cycle-consistent adversarial networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision, pp.  2223–2232, 2017.
Citations (6)

Summary

  • The paper introduces an optimal single-iteration approach to Schrödinger bridge matching, reducing error accumulation in dynamic optimal transport estimations.
  • It leverages a Gaussian mixture parameterization to analytically express the Schrödinger bridge drift for rapid evaluation and training.
  • Empirical results demonstrate robust performance across benchmarks, including low-dimensional mappings, high-dimensional biological data, and image-to-image translation.

Overview of "Light and Optimal Schrödinger Bridge Matching"

This paper introduces a novel approach for solving Schrödinger Bridges (SB), leveraging their connections to Entropic Optimal Transport (EOT). The authors propose a method termed "optimal Schrödinger bridge matching," which exhibits notable efficiency and efficacy in approximating SBs with a single bridge matching iteration. This addresses the inherent limitations of existing iterative approaches that accumulate errors throughout training.

Context and Motivation

Schrödinger Bridges have been a subject of interest because they extend classical diffusion models. The association of SBs with EOT provides a compelling dynamical viewpoint, where the optimal transport plan is not only a static mapping but part of a dynamic distribution transformation. Recent studies either approximate the EOT using heuristics, such as minibatch OT, or engage iterative techniques with accumulating error potentials. These methods, though useful, often introduce biases or are computationally inefficient.

Methodology

Optimal Schrödinger Bridge Matching

The authors' primary contribution is the "optimal Schrödinger bridge matching" procedure:

  • Single Iteration Process: Rather than gradually improving an approximation, the proposed method achieves the SB with a single transition step through an optimal projection.
  • Flexible Input Plans: This procedure’s efficacy holds regardless of the initial transport plan used, whether it be independently constructed, derived from minibatch OT, or otherwise.
  • Gaussian Mixture Parameterization: An implementation cornerstone is the Gaussian mixture parameterization of the Schrödinger potential, facilitating analytical expression of the SB drift, permitting rapid evaluation and training.

Empirical Findings

A comprehensive suite of experiments demonstrates the methodology’s effectiveness across multiple standard tasks:

  1. 2D Example: Efficiently maps distributions in low-dimensional spaces, adapting the level of noise as dictated by the transport regularization parameter, ε.
  2. Benchmark Comparisons: On established benchmarks, the method shows competitive performance in estimating the true EOT plan and reconstructing target distributions, surpassing several leading bridge matching techniques.
  3. Biological Data: In high-dimensional settings, such as single-cell expression data, the proposed method maintains robust performance and speed advantages.
  4. Image-to-Image Translation: Successfully translates unpaired image datasets, showing applicability in broader domains requiring transformation without direct mapping availability.

Implications

Theoretical Impact: The provision of a singular iteration approach for SB solution represents a significant methodological advance, reducing computational burdens and mitigating error accumulation witnessed in iterative methods.

Practical Applications: By supporting arbitrary initial plans, the method allows broader usability across various domains, especially in situations with high-dimensional data or where computational resources may be constrained.

Future Directions

Given the advantages demonstrated, future research may focus on broadening the method’s applicability to other high-dimensional generative tasks. Moreover, exploration into richer parameterization schemes for the Schrödinger potential could maintain the method’s robustness while extending its applicability further into complex generative models, such as those encountered in modern AI systems.

In summary, this research not only refines existing methodologies for SB computation but also posits a scalable, efficient approach that advances the field’s understanding of dynamic optimal transport solutions.

Youtube Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com