Interactive and Intelligent Root Cause Analysis in Manufacturing with Causal Bayesian Networks and Knowledge Graphs (2402.00043v1)
Abstract: Root Cause Analysis (RCA) in the manufacturing of electric vehicles is the process of identifying fault causes. Traditionally, the RCA is conducted manually, relying on process expert knowledge. Meanwhile, sensor networks collect significant amounts of data in the manufacturing process. Using this data for RCA makes it more efficient. However, purely data-driven methods like Causal Bayesian Networks have problems scaling to large-scale, real-world manufacturing processes due to the vast amount of potential cause-effect relationships (CERs). Furthermore, purely data-driven methods have the potential to leave out already known CERs or to learn spurious CERs. The paper contributes by proposing an interactive and intelligent RCA tool that combines expert knowledge of an electric vehicle manufacturing process and a data-driven machine learning method. It uses reasoning over a large-scale Knowledge Graph of the manufacturing process while learning a Causal Bayesian Network. In addition, an Interactive User Interface enables a process expert to give feedback to the root cause graph by adding and removing information to the Knowledge Graph. The interactive and intelligent RCA tool reduces the learning time of the Causal Bayesian Network while decreasing the number of spurious CERs. Thus, the interactive and intelligent RCA tool closes the feedback loop between expert and machine learning method.
- C. Wehner, F. Powlesland, B. Altakrouri, and U. Schmid, “Explainable online lane change predictions on a digital twin with a layer normalized lstm and layer-wise relevance propagation,” in Advances and Trends in Artificial Intelligence. Theory and Practices in Artificial Intelligence, H. Fujita, P. Fournier-Viger, M. Ali, and Y. Wang, Eds. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2022, pp. 621–632.
- E. e Oliveira, V. L. Miguéis, and J. L. Borges, “Automatic root cause analysis in manufacturing: an overview and conceptualization,” Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-022-01914-3
- K. M. Tay and C. P. Lim, “On the use of fuzzy inference techniques in assessment models: part ii: industrial applications,” Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, vol. 7, pp. 283–302, 2008. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10700-008-9037-y
- E. Ruijters and M. Stoelinga, “Fault tree analysis: A survey of the state-of-the-art in modeling, analysis and tools,” Computer Science Review, vol. 15-16, pp. 29–62, 2015. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1574013715000027
- S. Pradhan, R. Singh, K. Kachru, and S. Narasimhamurthy, “A bayesian network based approach for root-cause-analysis in manufacturing process,” in 2007 International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Security (CIS 2007), 2007, pp. 10–14.
- M. Kirchhof, K. Haas, T. Kornas, S. Thiede, M. Hirz, and C. Hermann, “Root cause analysis in lithium-ion battery production with fmea-based large-scale bayesian network,” 06 2020.
- M. Kertel, S. Harmeling, and M. Pauly, “Learning causal graphs in manufacturing domains using structural equation models,” 2022. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.14573
- ISO/IEC, “Risk management — Risk assessment techniques,” International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, CH, Standard, Jun. 2019.
- Q. Ma, H. Li, and A. Thorstenson, “A big data-driven root cause analysis system: Application of machine learning in quality problem solving,” Computers and Industrial Engineering, vol. 160, p. 107580, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360835221004848
- A. Alaeddini and I. Dogan, “Using bayesian networks for root cause analysis in statistical process control,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 38, no. 9, pp. 11 230–11 243, 2011. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957417411003952
- A. Lokrantz, E. Gustavsson, and M. Jirstrand, “Root cause analysis of failures and quality deviations in manufacturing using machine learning,” Procedia CIRP, vol. 72, pp. 1057–1062, 2018, 51st CIRP Conference on Manufacturing Systems. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212827118303895
- K. Marazopoulou, R. Ghosh, P. Lade, and D. Jensen, “Causal discovery for manufacturing domains,” 05 2016.
- J. Li and J. Shi, “Knowledge discovery from observational data for process control using causal bayesian networks,” IIE Transactions, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 681–690, 2007. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1080/07408170600899532
- L. Abele, M. Anic, T. Gutmann, J. Folmer, M. Kleinsteuber, and B. Vogel-Heuser, “Combining knowledge modeling and machine learning for alarm root cause analysis,” IFAC Proceedings Volumes, vol. 46, no. 9, pp. 1843–1848, 2013, 7th IFAC Conference on Manufacturing Modelling, Management, and Control. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1474667016345633
- G. Weidl, A. Madsen, and S. Israelson, “Applications of object-oriented bayesian networks for condition monitoring, root cause analysis and decision support on operation of complex continuous processes,” Computers and Chemical Engineering, vol. 29, no. 9, pp. 1996–2009, 2005. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S009813540500133X
- D. Zhang, L. Wang, Q. Hong, and K. Zhang, “Research on fault diagnosis of steam turbine based on bayesian network,” Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 1754, p. 012136, 02 2021.
- X. Zheng, C. Dan, B. Aragam, P. Ravikumar, and E. Xing, “Learning sparse nonparametric dags,” in International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics. PMLR, 2020, pp. 3414–3425.
- P. Bühlmann, J. Peters, and J. Ernest, “CAM: Causal additive models, high-dimensional order search and penalized regression,” The Annals of Statistics, vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 2526 – 2556, 2014. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1214/14-AOS1260
- G. Menegozzo, D. Dall’Alba, and P. Fiorini, “Cipcad-bench: Continuous industrial process datasets for benchmarking causal discovery methods,” in 2022 IEEE 18th International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering (CASE). IEEE, 2022, pp. 2124–2131.
- A. Hogan, E. Blomqvist, M. Cochez, C. D’amato, G. Melo, C. Gutierrez, S. Kirrane, J. E. L. Gayo, R. Navigli, S. Neumaier, A.-C. N. Ngomo, A. Polleres, S. M. Rashid, A. Rula, L. Schmelzeisen, J. Sequeda, S. Staab, and A. Zimmermann, “Knowledge graphs,” ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 54, pp. 1–37, 2021.
- J. Gallian, “A dynamic survey of graph labeling,” Electron. J. Combin., Dynamic Surveys, vol. 19, 11 2000.
- A. Wille, P. Zimmermann, E. Vranová, A. Fürholz, O. Laule, S. Bleuler, L. Hennig, A. Prelić, P. von Rohr, L. Thiele et al., “Sparse graphical gaussian modeling of the isoprenoid gene network in arabidopsis thaliana,” Genome biology, vol. 5, no. 11, pp. 1–13, 2004.
- G. N. Saxe, S. Ma, L. J. Morales, I. R. Galatzer-Levy, C. Aliferis, and C. R. Marmar, “Computational causal discovery for post-traumatic stress in police officers,” Translational psychiatry, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2020.
- S. Shimizu, T. Inazumi, Y. Sogawa, A. Hyvärinen, Y. Kawahara, T. Washio, P. O. Hoyer, and K. Bollen, “Directlingam: A direct method for learning a linear non-gaussian structural equation model,” J. Mach. Learn. Res., vol. 12, no. 0, p. 1225–1248, jul 2011.
- Y. Yu, J. Chen, T. Gao, and M. Yu, “DAG-GNN: DAG structure learning with graph neural networks,” in Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Machine Learning, ser. Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, K. Chaudhuri and R. Salakhutdinov, Eds., vol. 97. PMLR, 09–15 Jun 2019, pp. 7154–7163. [Online]. Available: https://proceedings.mlr.press/v97/yu19a.html
- A. Shojaie and G. Michailidis, “Penalized likelihood methods for estimation of sparse high-dimensional directed acyclic graphs,” Biometrika, vol. 97, no. 3, pp. 519–538, 07 2010. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/asq038