Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
169 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Predictive Analysis for Optimizing Port Operations (2401.14498v2)

Published 25 Jan 2024 in cs.LG, cs.SY, eess.SY, stat.AP, and stat.ML

Abstract: Maritime transport is a pivotal logistics mode for the long-distance and bulk transportation of goods. However, the intricate planning involved in this mode is often hindered by uncertainties, including weather conditions, cargo diversity, and port dynamics, leading to increased costs. Consequently, accurate estimation of the total (stay) time of the vessel and any delays at the port are essential for efficient planning and scheduling of port operations. This study aims to develop predictive analytics to address the shortcomings in the previous works of port operations for a vessels Stay Time and Delay Time, offering a valuable contribution to the field of maritime logistics. The proposed solution is designed to assist decision making in port environments and predict service delays. This is demonstrated through a case study on Brazil's ports. Additionally, feature analysis is used to understand the key factors impacting maritime logistics, enhancing the overall understanding of the complexities involved in port operations. Furthermore, we perform Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) analysis to interpret the effects of the features on the outcomes and understand their impact on each sample, providing deeper insights into the factors influencing port operations.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (37)
  1. Dataset - stay time of ships in brazilian ports in 2018.
  2. A decision tree model for the prediction of the stay time of ships in brazilian ports. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence.
  3. Altman, N. S. (1992). An introduction to kernel and nearest-neighbor nonparametric regression. The American Statistician, 46:175–185.
  4. A follow-up survey of berth allocation and quay crane scheduling problems in container terminals. Eur. J. Oper. Res., 244:675–689.
  5. Breiman, L. (2001). Random forests. Machine Learning, 45:5–32.
  6. Efficiency container ports in brazil: A dea and fdh approach. The Central European Review of Economics and Management (CEREM), 2(1):43–64.
  7. Port Dada Integration: Opportunities for Optimization and Value Creation, pages 1–22.
  8. Research in marine accidents: A bibliometric analysis, systematic review and future directions. Ocean Engineering.
  9. Xgboost: A scalable tree boosting system. pages 785–794.
  10. Support-vector networks. Machine Learning, 20:273–297.
  11. Can the brazilian national logistics plan induce port competitiveness by reshaping the port service areas? Sustainability, 14:14567.
  12. Climate change, seaports, and coastal management in brazil: An overview of the policy framework. Regional Studies in Marine Science, 52:102365.
  13. Opportunities and Challenges in Relation to Big Data Analytics for the Shipping and Port Industries, pages 267–290.
  14. Dulebenets, M. A. (2018). A comprehensive multi-objective optimization model for the vessel scheduling problem in liner shipping. International Journal of Production Economics, 196:293–318.
  15. The development of a ship performance model in varying operating conditions based on ann and regression techniques. Ocean Engineering, 198:106972.
  16. A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting. Journal of computer and system sciences, 55:119–.
  17. 20 years of port reform in brazil: Insights into the reform process. Research in transportation business and management, 22:153–160.
  18. Extremely randomized trees. Machine Learning, 63:3–42.
  19. Column generation for the multi-port berth allocation problem with port cooperation stability. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 171:3–28.
  20. Idiot’s bayes—not so stupid after all? International Statistical Review, 69.
  21. Climate change risk to global port operations. Nature Climate Change, 11:14–20.
  22. An introduction to statistical learning. Springer Texts in Statistics.
  23. Lightgbm: A highly efficient gradient boosting decision tree. In Guyon, I., Luxburg, U. V., Bengio, S., Wallach, H., Fergus, R., Vishwanathan, S., and Garnett, R., editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 30. Curran Associates, Inc.
  24. Kohavi, R. (1995). A study of cross-validation and bootstrap for accuracy estimation and model selection. In International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence.
  25. Robust berth scheduling using machine learning for vessel arrival time prediction. Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, 35:29–69.
  26. Port sustainability and performance: A systematic literature review. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment.
  27. Efficiency and productivity of container terminals in brazilian ports (2008‚Äì2017). Utilities Policy, 56:82–91.
  28. Understanding variable importances in forests of randomized trees. In Neural Information Processing Systems.
  29. Machine learning models for efficient port terminal operations: Case of vessels‚Äô arrival times prediction. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 55(10):3172–3177. 10th IFAC Conference on Manufacturing Modelling, Management and Control MIM 2022.
  30. A data-driven optimization of large-scale dry port location using the hybrid approach of data mining and complex network theory. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 134.
  31. Prediction of arrival time of vessels considering future weather conditions. Applied Sciences, 11:4410.
  32. Berth allocation and quay crane assignment/scheduling problem under uncertainty: A survey. Eur. J. Oper. Res., 303:501–524.
  33. van Boetzelaer, F. B. (2013). Masters thesis: Model predictive scheduling for container terminals.
  34. An analysis of factors affecting the severity of marine accidents. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 210:107513.
  35. Optimizing container terminal operations: a systematic review of operations research applications. Maritime Economics & Logistics.
  36. Addendum: Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), 67.
  37. Çağatay Iris and Lam, J. S. L. (2019). A review of energy efficiency in ports: Operational strategies, technologies and energy management systems. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 112:170–182.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com