Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
41 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
41 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
7 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Zero Bubble Pipeline Parallelism (2401.10241v1)

Published 30 Nov 2023 in cs.DC, cs.AI, and cs.LG

Abstract: Pipeline parallelism is one of the key components for large-scale distributed training, yet its efficiency suffers from pipeline bubbles which were deemed inevitable. In this work, we introduce a scheduling strategy that, to our knowledge, is the first to successfully achieve zero pipeline bubbles under synchronous training semantics. The key idea behind this improvement is to split the backward computation into two parts, one that computes gradient for the input and another that computes for the parameters. Based on this idea, we handcraft novel pipeline schedules that significantly outperform the baseline methods. We further develop an algorithm that automatically finds an optimal schedule based on specific model configuration and memory limit. Additionally, to truly achieve zero bubble, we introduce a novel technique to bypass synchronizations during the optimizer step. Experimental evaluations show that our method outperforms the 1F1B schedule up to 23% in throughput under a similar memory limit. This number can be further pushed to 31% when the memory constraint is relaxed. We believe our results mark a major step forward in harnessing the true potential of pipeline parallelism. We open sourced our implementation based on the popular Megatron-LM repository on https://github.com/sail-sg/zero-bubble-pipeline-parallelism.

Zero Bubble Pipeline Parallelism: An Innovative Scheduling Approach

The paper "Zero Bubble Pipeline Parallelism" by Penghui Qi, Xinyi Wan, and Guangxing Huang introduces an advanced scheduling strategy aimed at mitigating pipeline bubbles in large-scale distributed training. Pipeline parallelism (PP) is an integral mechanism for training deep neural networks (DNNs) distributed over multiple GPUs, but it inherently suffers from inefficiencies termed "pipeline bubbles," which are periods of idle time created due to interdependencies among stages.

Core Contributions

The authors propose a novel scheduling method that uniquely achieves zero pipeline bubbles under synchronous training. The major contributions of this research can be summarized as follows:

  1. Splitting the Backward Computation: The key innovation is the bifurcation of the backward computation into two separate operations: one that computes gradients for inputs (denoted as B) and one for the parameters (denoted as W). This approach allows for more flexible scheduling, significantly reducing sequential dependencies.
  2. Handcrafted Schedules: The paper presents two novel handcrafted schedules—\zbh{1} and \zbh{2}:
    • \zbh{1} minimizes sequential dependencies without increasing peak memory consumption.
    • \zbh{2} achieves a zero bubble schedule by allowing more memory consumption, filling pipeline bubbles more efficiently.
  3. Automatic Scheduling Algorithm: An automated algorithm is developed to optimize pipeline schedules by considering realistic execution times and memory limits. This heuristic algorithm generates schedules that closely approximate or exceed the performance of handcrafted schedules.
  4. Optimizer Synchronization Bypass: The authors introduce a workaround to circumvent synchronization barriers during the optimizer steps. This is achieved through post-update validation, reducing unnecessary synchronization overhead and maintaining synchronous optimization semantics.
  5. Empirical Evaluations: Rigorous experimental evaluations reveal the proposed methods improve throughput by up to 31% over the conventional 1F1B schedule, demonstrating their practical efficacy. The results are verified with models sized up to 28.3 billion parameters on a distributed setup involving multiple GPUs.

Detailed Insights

Handcrafted Schedules

The schedules \zbh{1} and \zbh{2} are designed to experiment with trade-offs between memory usage and pipeline efficiency. The detailed analysis indicates:

  • \zbh{1} uses the same peak memory as 1F1B but rearranges the B and W operations, reducing bubble size significantly.
  • \zbh{2} allows a larger memory footprint. By introducing additional forward passes in the warm-up phase, it completely fills the pipeline stages, leading to zero bubbles.

Automatic Scheduling Algorithm

To handle realistic running conditions, the paper's heuristic algorithm fine-tunes the scheduling. This method takes practical considerations such as communication times ($T_{\text{comm}$), running times of different passes (TFT_F, TBT_B, TWT_W), and memory consumption into account to optimize scheduling dynamically. The integer linear programming (ILP) formulation further aids in finding optimal or near-optimal scheduling.

Memory Efficiency

Real-world applicability of the method is further enhanced by emphasizing memory efficiency. ZB-V scheduling achieves zero bubbles while maintaining the same memory constraints as 1F1B, balancing the trade-off between microbatch size and pipeline bubble size proficiently.

Implications and Future Directions

The implications of achieving zero bubble pipeline parallelism are substantial. Practically, this research optimizes GPU utilization, reducing training times for large-scale models significantly. Theoretically, it opens up new avenues for improving distributed training frameworks. Potential future developments could delve into more intricate dynamic scheduling methods, hybrid parallelism strategies encompassing tensor, data, and pipeline parallelism, and further refinement of memory efficiency techniques.

The advancements presented in "Zero Bubble Pipeline Parallelism" not only push the boundaries of parallel computing for DNN training but also set a robust foundation for future innovations in distributed learning systems. As models scale larger, the need for such efficient and memory-conscious parallelism strategies will become ever more critical, making this research a pivotal reference in the field of AI and large-scale machine learning.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (21)
  1. Language models are few-shot learners. Advances in neural information processing systems, 33:1877–1901, 2020.
  2. {{\{{TVM}}\}}: An automated {{\{{End-to-End}}\}} optimizing compiler for deep learning. In 13th USENIX Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation (OSDI 18), pp.  578–594, 2018.
  3. Dapple: A pipelined data parallel approach for training large models. In Proceedings of the 26th ACM SIGPLAN Symposium on Principles and Practice of Parallel Programming, pp.  431–445, 2021.
  4. Cbc user guide. In Emerging theory, methods, and applications, pp.  257–277. INFORMS, 2005.
  5. Accurate, large minibatch sgd: Training imagenet in 1 hour. arXiv preprint arXiv:1706.02677, 2017.
  6. Pipedream: Fast and efficient pipeline parallel dnn training. arXiv preprint arXiv:1806.03377, 2018.
  7. Gpipe: Efficient training of giant neural networks using pipeline parallelism. Advances in neural information processing systems, 32, 2019.
  8. Reducing activation recomputation in large transformer models. Proceedings of Machine Learning and Systems, 5, 2023.
  9. Mlir: A compiler infrastructure for the end of moore’s law. arXiv preprint arXiv:2002.11054, 2020.
  10. Pytorch distributed: Experiences on accelerating data parallel training. arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.15704, 2020.
  11. Decoupled weight decay regularization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.05101, 2017.
  12. Mixed precision training. arXiv preprint arXiv:1710.03740, 2017.
  13. Efficient large-scale language model training on gpu clusters using megatron-lm. In Proceedings of the International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis, pp.  1–15, 2021.
  14. On the difficulty of training recurrent neural networks. In International conference on machine learning, pp.  1310–1318. Pmlr, 2013.
  15. Zero: Memory optimizations toward training trillion parameter models. In SC20: International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis, pp.  1–16. IEEE, 2020.
  16. Relay: A new ir for machine learning frameworks. In Proceedings of the 2nd ACM SIGPLAN international workshop on machine learning and programming languages, pp.  58–68, 2018.
  17. Amit Sabne. Xla : Compiling machine learning for peak performance, 2020.
  18. Triton: an intermediate language and compiler for tiled neural network computations. In Proceedings of the 3rd ACM SIGPLAN International Workshop on Machine Learning and Programming Languages, pp.  10–19, 2019.
  19. Attention is all you need. Advances in neural information processing systems, 30, 2017.
  20. Pipemare: Asynchronous pipeline parallel dnn training. Proceedings of Machine Learning and Systems, 3:269–296, 2021.
  21. Alpa: Automating inter-and {{\{{Intra-Operator}}\}} parallelism for distributed deep learning. In 16th USENIX Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation (OSDI 22), pp.  559–578, 2022.
User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (4)
  1. Penghui Qi (8 papers)
  2. Xinyi Wan (7 papers)
  3. Guangxing Huang (2 papers)
  4. Min Lin (96 papers)
Citations (15)
Github Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Youtube Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

HackerNews