Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
110 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
56 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
44 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Transfer Learning in Human Activity Recognition: A Survey (2401.10185v1)

Published 18 Jan 2024 in cs.LG and eess.SP

Abstract: Sensor-based human activity recognition (HAR) has been an active research area, owing to its applications in smart environments, assisted living, fitness, healthcare, etc. Recently, deep learning based end-to-end training has resulted in state-of-the-art performance in domains such as computer vision and natural language, where large amounts of annotated data are available. However, large quantities of annotated data are not available for sensor-based HAR. Moreover, the real-world settings on which the HAR is performed differ in terms of sensor modalities, classification tasks, and target users. To address this problem, transfer learning has been employed extensively. In this survey, we focus on these transfer learning methods in the application domains of smart home and wearables-based HAR. In particular, we provide a problem-solution perspective by categorizing and presenting the works in terms of their contributions and the challenges they address. We also present an updated view of the state-of-the-art for both application domains. Based on our analysis of 205 papers, we highlight the gaps in the literature and provide a roadmap for addressing them. This survey provides a reference to the HAR community, by summarizing the existing works and providing a promising research agenda.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (223)
  1. 2021. https://www.nist.gov/el/intelligent-systems-division-73500/definitions
  2. 2023. https://www.litmaps.com/
  3. StreamAR: Incremental and Active Learning with Evolving Sensory Data for Activity Recognition. 2012 IEEE 24th International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence (2012). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTAI.2012.169
  4. Activity Recognition with Evolving Data Streams. Comput. Surveys (2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3158645
  5. Zahraa Said Abdallah. 2015. Adaptive activity recognition techniques with evolving data streams. (2015). https://doi.org/10.4225/03/58B64E023C846
  6. A Survey on Deep Learning Architectures in Human Activities Recognition Application in Sports Science, Healthcare, and Security. In The International Conference on Innovations in Computing Research. Springer, 121–134.
  7. A. Akbari and R. Jafari. 2019. Transferring Activity Recognition Models for New Wearable Sensors with Deep Generative Domain Adaptation. International Symposium on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3302506.3310391
  8. A. Akbari and R. Jafari. 2020. Personalizing Activity Recognition Models Through Quantifying Different Types of Uncertainty Using Wearable Sensors. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2019.2963816
  9. Domain Adaptation Methods for Lab-to-Field Human Context Recognition. Italian National Conference on Sensors (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/S23063081
  10. Mohammad Arif Ul Alam and Nirmalya Roy. 2017. Unseen activity recognitions: A hierarchical active transfer learning approach. In 2017 IEEE 37th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems (ICDCS). IEEE, 436–446.
  11. A review of smart homes—Past, present, and future. IEEE transactions on systems, man, and cybernetics, part C (applications and reviews) 42, 6 (2012), 1190–1203.
  12. Hande Alemdar and Cem Ersoy. 2010. Wireless sensor networks for healthcare: A survey. Computer networks 54, 15 (2010), 2688–2710.
  13. Improving the adaptation process for a new smart home user. In International Conference on Innovative Techniques and Applications of Artificial Intelligence. Springer, 421–434.
  14. A user-guided personalization methodology to facilitate new smart home occupancy. Universal Access in the Information Society 22, 3 (2023), 869–891.
  15. Model-Agnostic Structural Transfer Learning for Cross-Domain Autonomous Activity Recognition. Italian National Conference on Sensors (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/S23146337
  16. Actilabel: A combinatorial transfer learning framework for activity recognition. arXiv preprint arXiv:2003.07415 (2020).
  17. Transfer Learning for Human Activity Recognition Using Representational Analysis of Neural Networks. ACM Transactions on Computing for Healthcare (2020). https://doi.org/10.1145/3563948
  18. Physical Activity Recognition using Deep Transfer Learning with Convolutional Neural Networks. 2022 IEEE Intl Conf on Dependable, Autonomic and Secure Computing, Intl Conf on Pervasive Intelligence and Computing, Intl Conf on Cloud and Big Data Computing, Intl Conf on Cyber Science and Technology Congress (DASC/PiCom/CBDCom/CyberSciTech) (2022). https://doi.org/10.1109/DASC/PICOM/CBDCOM/CY55231.2022.9928021
  19. Video-based Pose-Estimation Data as Source for Transfer Learning in Human Activity Recognition. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPR56361.2022.9956405
  20. Cross-environment activity recognition using word embeddings for sensor and activity representation. Neurocomputing 418 (2020), 280–290.
  21. Internet of things (IoT) based activity recognition strategies in smart homes: A review. IEEE Sensors Journal 22, 9 (2022), 8327–8336.
  22. Opportunistic Activity Recognition in IoT Sensor Ecosystems via Multimodal Transfer Learning. Neural Processing Letters (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/S11063-021-10468-Z
  23. Paulo Barbosa. 2018. Human Activities Recognition: a Transfer Learning Approach. (2018).
  24. Unsupervised Domain Adaptation for Human Activity Recognition. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03493-1_65
  25. Personalized Semi-Supervised Federated Learning for Human Activity Recognition. ArXiv (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/S00779-022-01688-8
  26. Using unlabeled data in a sparse-coding framework for human activity recognition. Pervasive and Mobile Computing 15 (2014), 242–262.
  27. Using unlabeled data in a sparse-coding framework for human activity recognition. (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PMCJ.2014.05.006
  28. Ulf Blanke and B. Schiele. 2010. Remember and transfer what you have learned - recognizing composite activities based on activity spotting. International Symposium on Wearable Computers (ISWC) 2010 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1109/ISWC.2010.5665869
  29. Aaron F Bobick. 1997. Movement, activity and action: the role of knowledge in the perception of motion. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 352, 1358 (1997), 1257–1265.
  30. A survey of human activity recognition in smart homes based on IoT sensors algorithms: Taxonomies, challenges, and opportunities with deep learning. Sensors 21, 18 (2021), 6037.
  31. A tutorial on human activity recognition using body-worn inertial sensors. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) 46, 3 (2014), 1–33.
  32. A review on vision techniques applied to human behaviour analysis for ambient-assisted living. Expert Systems with Applications 39, 12 (2012), 10873–10888.
  33. Domain Adaptation for Inertial Measurement Unit-based Human Activity Recognition: A Survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.06489 (2023).
  34. Activity recognition in wearables using adversarial multi-source domain adaptation. Smart Health 19 (2021), 100174.
  35. Semi-supervised Multi-source Domain Adaptation in Wearable Activity Recognition. 2022 18th International Conference on Distributed Computing in Sensor Systems (DCOSS) (2022). https://doi.org/10.1109/DCOSS54816.2022.00017
  36. A Systematic Study of Unsupervised Domain Adaptation for Robust Human-Activity Recognition. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1145/3380985
  37. Re-defining the roles of sensors in objective physical activity monitoring. Medicine and science in sports and exercise 44, 1 Suppl 1 (2012), S13.
  38. An ontology-based hybrid approach to activity modeling for smart homes. IEEE Transactions on human-machine systems 44, 1 (2013), 92–105.
  39. METIER: A Deep Multi-Task Learning Based Activity and User Recognition Model Using Wearable Sensors. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1145/3381012
  40. Activity Recognition Using Transfer Learning. Sensors & Materials 29 (2017).
  41. Feature matching and instance reweighting with transfer learning for human activity recognition using smartphone. The Journal of Supercomputing (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/S11227-021-03844-Y
  42. FedHealth: A Federated Transfer Learning Framework for Wearable Healthcare. IEEE Intelligent Systems (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/MIS.2020.2988604
  43. Cross-position activity recognition with stratified transfer learning. Pervasive and Mobile Computing (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PMCJ.2019.04.004
  44. Towards zero-shot learning for human activity recognition using semantic attribute sequence model. UbiComp (2013). https://doi.org/10.1145/2493432.2493511
  45. NuActiv: recognizing unseen new activities using semantic attribute-based learning. MobiSys ’13 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1145/2462456.2464438
  46. Yi-ting Chiang and Jane Yung-jen Hsu. 2012. Knowledge transfer in activity recognition using sensor profile. In 2012 9th International Conference on Ubiquitous Intelligence and Computing and 9th International Conference on Autonomic and Trusted Computing. IEEE, 180–187.
  47. A feature-based knowledge transfer framework for cross-environment activity recognition toward smart home applications. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems 47, 3 (2017), 310–322.
  48. A CNN Based Transfer Learning Model for Automatic Activity Recognition from Accelerometer Sensors. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96133-0_23
  49. Transfer learning for activity recognition: A survey. Knowledge and information systems 36 (2013), 537–556.
  50. Diane J Cook. 2010. Learning setting-generalized activity models for smart spaces. IEEE intelligent systems 2010, 99 (2010), 1.
  51. Gabriela Csurka et al. 2017. Domain adaptation in computer vision applications. Vol. 2. Springer.
  52. Imagenet: A large-scale hierarchical image database. In 2009 IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. Ieee, 248–255.
  53. Cross-person activity recognition using reduced kernel extreme learning machine. Neural Networks (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.NEUNET.2014.01.008
  54. How Much Unlabeled Data is Really Needed for Effective Self-Supervised Human Activity Recognition?. In Proceedings of the 2023 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers. 66–70.
  55. Bayesian active transfer learning in smart homes. In ICML Active Learning Workshop, Vol. 2015.
  56. Active transfer learning for activity recognition. ESANN (2016).
  57. Multisource Weighted Domain Adaptation With Evidential Reasoning for Activity Recognition. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics (2023). https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2022.3182780
  58. Transfer learning for estimating occupancy and recognizing activities in smart buildings. Building and Environment 217 (2022), 109057.
  59. Transfer learning across human activities using a cascade neural network architecture. Ubiquitous Computing (2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3341163.3347730
  60. Personalized Activity Recognition Using Partially Available Target Data. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing (2023). https://doi.org/10.1109/TMC.2021.3071434
  61. Ramin Fallahzadeh and Hassan Ghasemzadeh. 2017. Personalization without User Interruption: Boosting Activity Recognition in New Subjects Using Unlabeled Data. 2017 ACM/IEEE 8th International Conference on Cyber-Physical Systems (ICCPS) (2017). https://doi.org/10.1145/3055004.3055015
  62. A Novel Deep Neural Network Method for HAR-Based Team Training Using Body-Worn Inertial Sensors. (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/S22218507
  63. STranGAN: Adversarially-learnt Spatial Transformer for scalable human activity recognition. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SMHL.2021.100226
  64. AugToAct: scaling complex human activity recognition with few labels. MobiQuitous (2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3360774.3360831
  65. Kyle D. Feuz and D. Cook. 2014. Heterogeneous transfer learning for activity recognition using heuristic search techniques. Int. J. Pervasive Comput. Commun. (2014). https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPCC-03-2014-0020
  66. Kyle D Feuz and Diane J Cook. 2015. Transfer learning across feature-rich heterogeneous feature spaces via feature-space remapping (FSR). ACM transactions on intelligent systems and technology (TIST) 6, 1 (2015), 1–27.
  67. Kyle D Feuz and Diane J Cook. 2017. Collegial activity learning between heterogeneous sensors. Knowledge and information systems 53 (2017), 337–364.
  68. Personalized Human Activity Recognition Based on Integrated Wearable Sensor and Transfer Learning. Italian National Conference on Sensors (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/S21030885
  69. Vision-language pre-training: Basics, recent advances, and future trends. Foundations and Trends® in Computer Graphics and Vision 14, 3–4 (2022), 163–352.
  70. Imagebind: One embedding space to bind them all. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 15180–15190.
  71. Cross-dataset deep transfer learning for activity recognition. UbiComp/ISWC Adjunct (2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3341162.3344865
  72. Adapting to Unknown Conditions in Learning-Based Mobile Sensing. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing (2022). https://doi.org/10.1109/TMC.2021.3061130
  73. MetaSense: few-shot adaptation to untrained conditions in deep mobile sensing. ACM International Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3356250.3360020
  74. Gautham Krishna Gudur and Satheesh K. Perepu. 2020. Federated Learning with Heterogeneous Labels and Models for Mobile Activity Monitoring. ArXiv (2020).
  75. A Transferred Daily Activity Recognition Method Based on Sensor Sequences. Neural Processing Letters 55, 2 (2023), 1001–1028.
  76. Importance-weighted least-squares probabilistic classifier for covariate shift adaptation with application to human activity recognition. Neurocomputing (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.NEUCOM.2011.09.016
  77. On the role of features in human activity recognition. In Proceedings of the 2019 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers. 78–88.
  78. Assessing the state of self-supervised human activity recognition using wearables. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 6, 3 (2022), 1–47.
  79. Investigating enhancements to contrastive predictive coding for human activity recognition. In 2023 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications (PerCom). IEEE, 232–241.
  80. Semi-supervised and Unsupervised Privacy-Preserving Distributed Transfer Learning Approach in HAR Systems. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/S11277-020-07891-1
  81. B. Hashim and R. Amutha. 2022. Deep transfer learning based human activity recognition by transforming IMU data to image domain using novel activity image creation method. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems (2022). https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-213174
  82. Investigating Domain-agnostic Performance in Activity Recognition using Accelerometer Data. Proceedings of the 2022 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (2022). https://doi.org/10.1145/3544793.3560398
  83. Going deeper into action recognition: A survey. Image and vision computing 60 (2017), 4–21.
  84. Bootstrapping Human Activity Recognition Systems for Smart Homes from Scratch. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 6, 3 (2022), 1–27.
  85. Shruthi K Hiremath and Thomas Plötz. 2023. The Lifespan of Human Activity Recognition Systems for Smart Homes. Sensors 23, 18 (2023), 7729.
  86. Alexander Hoelzemann and Kristof Van Laerhoven. 2020. Digging deeper: towards a better understanding of transfer learning for human activity recognition. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1145/3410531.3414311
  87. Toward Personalized Activity Recognition Systems With a Semipopulation Approach. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/THMS.2015.2489688
  88. A comprehensive survey of deep learning for image captioning. ACM Computing Surveys (CsUR) 51, 6 (2019), 1–36.
  89. A Novel Feature Incremental Learning Method for Sensor-Based Activity Recognition. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2018.2855159
  90. Derekhao Hu and Qiang Yang. 2011. Transfer learning for activity recognition via sensor mapping. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Second International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain. 1962.
  91. Cross-domain activity recognition via transfer learning. Pervasive and Mobile Computing 7, 3 (2011), 344–358.
  92. Less Annotation on Personalized Activity Recognition Using Context Data. (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/UIC-ATC-SCALCOM-CBDCOM-IOP-SMARTWORLD.2016.0066
  93. SWL-Adapt: An Unsupervised Domain Adaptation Model with Sample Weight Learning for Cross-User Wearable Human Activity Recognition. Proceedings of the … AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (2023). https://doi.org/10.1609/AAAI.V37I5.25743
  94. VMA: Domain Variance- and Modality-Aware Model Transfer for Fine-Grained Occupant Activity Recognition. International Symposium on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (2022). https://doi.org/10.1109/IPSN54338.2022.00028
  95. Amir Hussein and Hazem Hajj. 2022. Domain Adaptation with Representation Learning and Nonlinear Relation for Time Series. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1145/3502905
  96. Sozo Inoue and Xincheng Pan. 2016. Supervised and unsupervised transfer learning for activity recognition from simple in-home sensors. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Systems: Computing, Networking and Services. 20–27.
  97. Evaluation of Transfer Learning for Human Activity Recognition Among Different Datasets. 2019 IEEE Intl Conf on Dependable, Autonomic and Secure Computing, Intl Conf on Pervasive Intelligence and Computing, Intl Conf on Cloud and Big Data Computing, Intl Conf on Cyber Science and Technology Congress (DASC/PiCom/CBDCom/CyberSciTech) (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/DASC/PICOM/CBDCOM/CYBERSCITECH.2019.00155
  98. Cross-location transfer learning for the sussex-huawei locomotion recognition challenge. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3341162.3344856
  99. SenseHAR: a robust virtual activity sensor for smartphones and wearables. SenSys (2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3356250.3360032
  100. Md Abdullah Al Hafiz Khan and N. Roy. 2017. TransAct: Transfer learning enabled activity recognition. 2017 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PerCom Workshops) (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/PERCOMW.2017.7917621
  101. Md Abdullah Al Hafiz Khan and N. Roy. 2018. UnTran: Recognizing Unseen Activities with Unlabeled Data Using Transfer Learning. International Conference on Internet-of-Things Design and Implementation (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/IOTDI.2018.00014
  102. Md Abdullah Al Hafiz Khan and Nirmalya Roy. 2022. Cross-Domain Unseen Activity Recognition Using Transfer Learning. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1109/COMPSAC54236.2022.00117
  103. Scaling Human Activity Recognition via Deep Learning-based Domain Adaptation. 2018 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications (PerCom) (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/PERCOM.2018.8444585
  104. Kazuma Kondo and Tatsuhito Hasegawa. 2022. Deep Transfer Learning Using Class Augmentation for Sensor-Based Human Activity Recognition. IEEE Sensors Letters (2022). https://doi.org/10.1109/LSENS.2022.3206472
  105. Collaborative learning based on centroid-distance-vector for wearable devices. Knowledge Based Systems (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.KNOSYS.2020.105569
  106. Prabhat Kumar and S. Suresh. 2022a. DeepTransHHAR: Inter-subjects Heterogeneous Activity Recognition Approach in the Non-identical Environment Using Wearable Sensors. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/S40009-022-01126-6
  107. Prabhat Kumar and S. Suresh. 2022b. RecurrentHAR: A Novel Transfer Learning-Based Deep Learning Model for Sequential, Complex, Concurrent, Interleaved, and Heterogeneous Type Human Activity Recognition. IETE Technical Review (2022). https://doi.org/10.1080/02564602.2022.2101557
  108. Prabhat Kumar and S. Suresh. 2023. DeepTransHAR: a novel clustering-based transfer learning approach for recognizing the cross-domain human activities using GRUs (Gated Recurrent Units) Networks. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IOT.2023.100681
  109. Imutube: Automatic extraction of virtual on-body accelerometry from video for human activity recognition. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 4, 3 (2020), 1–29.
  110. Using additional training sensors to improve single-sensor complex activity recognition. International Workshop on the Semantic Web (2021). https://doi.org/10.1145/3460421.3480421
  111. Achieving Single-Sensor Complex Activity Recognition from Multi-Sensor Training Data. ArXiv (2020).
  112. Enabling large-scale human activity inference on smartphones using community similarity networks (csn). UbiComp ’11 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1145/2030112.2030160
  113. Oscar D Lara and Miguel A Labrador. 2012. A survey on human activity recognition using wearable sensors. IEEE communications surveys & tutorials 15, 3 (2012), 1192–1209.
  114. Generating Virtual On-body Accelerometer Data from Virtual Textual Descriptions for Human Activity Recognition. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.03187 (2023).
  115. Deep Transfer Learning for Time Series Data Based on Sensor Modality Classification. Italian National Conference on Sensors (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/S20154271
  116. Transfer Learning Improves Accelerometer-Based Child Activity Recognition via Subject-Independent Adult-Domain Adaption. IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics (2022). https://doi.org/10.1109/JBHI.2021.3118717
  117. Towards Learning Disentangled Representations for Time Series. KDD (2022). https://doi.org/10.1145/3534678.3539140
  118. Human activity recognition based on multienvironment sensor data. Information Fusion 91 (2023), 47–63.
  119. Improving activity classification for health applications on mobile devices using active and semi-supervised learning. 2010 4th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (2010). https://doi.org/10.4108/ICST.PERVASIVEHEALTH2010.8851
  120. Ching Hu Lu and Yi Ting Chiang. 2014. An instantiation of the multiple-transfer framework to reduce efforts in context model learning for new users in smart homes. In 2014 Tenth International Conference on Intelligent Information Hiding and Multimedia Signal Processing. IEEE, 118–121.
  121. Hybrid user-assisted incremental model adaptation for activity recognition in a dynamic smart-home environment. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems 43, 5 (2013), 421–436.
  122. Cross-domain activity recognition via substructural optimal transport. Neurocomputing (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.NEUCOM.2021.04.124
  123. Semantic-Discriminative Mixup for Generalizable Sensor-based Cross-domain Activity Recognition. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive Mobile Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies (2022). https://doi.org/10.1145/3534589
  124. Incremental Real-Time Personalization in Human Activity Recognition Using Domain Adaptive Batch Normalization. Proceedings of the ACM on interactive, mobile, wearable and ubiquitous technologies (2020). https://doi.org/10.1145/3432230
  125. Johan Medrano and Fuchun Joseph Lin. 2019. Enabling machine learning across heterogeneous sensor networks with graph autoencoders. In Ambient Intelligence: 15th European Conference, AmI 2019, Rome, Italy, November 13–15, 2019, Proceedings 15. Springer, 153–169.
  126. Measurement of noise characteristics of MEMS accelerometers. Solid-State Electronics 47, 2 (2003), 357–360.
  127. Francisco Javier Ordóñez Morales and Daniel Roggen. 2016. Deep convolutional feature transfer across mobile activity recognition domains, sensor modalities and locations. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers. 92–99.
  128. Appropriateness of performance indices for imbalanced data classification: An analysis. Pattern Recognition 102 (2020), 107197.
  129. Jonathan Munro and Dima Damen. 2020. Multi-modal domain adaptation for fine-grained action recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 122–132.
  130. H-H Nagel. 1988. From image sequences towards conceptual descriptions. Image and vision computing 6, 2 (1988), 59–74.
  131. I did not smoke 100 cigarettes today!: avoiding false positives in real-world activity recognition. UbiComp (2015). https://doi.org/10.1145/2750858.2804256
  132. Recognizing new activities with limited training data. SEMWEB (2015). https://doi.org/10.1145/2802083.2808388
  133. Multi-source transfer learning for human activity recognition in smart homes. In 2020 IEEE international conference on smart computing (SMARTCOMP). IEEE, 274–277.
  134. Source Domain Selection for Cross-House Human Activity Recognition with Ambient Sensors. In 2022 21st IEEE International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA). IEEE, 754–759.
  135. Tsuyoshi Okita and Sozo Inoue. 2018. Activity Recognition: Translation across Sensor Modalities Using Deep Learning. UbiComp/ISWC Adjunct (2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3267305.3267512
  136. Sinno Jialin Pan and Qiang Yang. 2009. A survey on transfer learning. IEEE Transactions on knowledge and data engineering 22, 10 (2009), 1345–1359.
  137. Transfer Learning Approach for Human Activity Recognition Based on Continuous Wavelet Transform. Algorithms (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/A16020077
  138. MARS: Mixed Virtual and Real Wearable Sensors for Human Activity Recognition With Multidomain Deep Learning Model. IEEE Internet of Things Journal (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2021.3055859
  139. Thomas Plötz. 2023. If only we had more data!: Sensor-Based Human Activity Recognition in Challenging Scenarios. In 2023 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops and other Affiliated Events (PerCom Workshops). IEEE, 565–570.
  140. Thomas Plötz and Yu Guan. 2018. Deep learning for human activity recognition in mobile computing. Computer 51, 5 (2018), 50–59.
  141. Domain adaptation of binary sensors in smart environments through activity alignment. IEEE Access 8 (2020), 228804–228817.
  142. Semi-supervised and personalized federated activity recognition based on active learning and label propagation. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/S00779-022-01688-8
  143. Combining Public Human Activity Recognition Datasets to Mitigate Labeled Data Scarcity. arXiv.org (2023). https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2306.13735
  144. Latent Independent Excitation for Generalizable Sensor-based Cross-Person Activity Recognition. AAAI (2021). https://doi.org/10.1609/AAAI.V35I13.17416
  145. Domain Generalization for Activity Recognition via Adaptive Feature Fusion. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1145/3552434
  146. How convolutional neural network see the world-A survey of convolutional neural network visualization methods. arXiv preprint arXiv:1804.11191 (2018).
  147. Valentin Radu. 2019. Vision 2 Sensor : Knowledge Transfer Across Sensing Modalities for Human Activity Recognition. (2019).
  148. Enabling heterogeneous domain adaptation in multi-inhabitants smart home activity learning. In 2022 18th International Conference on Mobility, Sensing and Networking (MSN). IEEE, 197–204.
  149. Star: A scalable self-taught learning framework for older adults’ activity recognition. In 2021 IEEE International Conference on Smart Computing (SMARTCOMP). IEEE, 121–128.
  150. Parisa Rashidi and Diane J Cook. 2009a. Keeping the resident in the loop: Adapting the smart home to the user. IEEE Transactions on systems, man, and cybernetics-part A: systems and humans 39, 5 (2009), 949–959.
  151. Parisa Rashidi and Diane J Cook. 2009b. Transferring learned activities in smart environments. In Intelligent Environments 2009. IOS Press, 185–192.
  152. Parisa Rashidi and Diane J Cook. 2010a. Activity Recognition Based on Home to Home Transfer Learning.. In Plan, Activity, and Intent Recognition.
  153. Parisa Rashidi and Diane J Cook. 2010b. Multi home transfer learning for resident activity discovery and recognition. In KDD International Workshop on Knowledge Discovery from Sensor Data. 53–63.
  154. Parisa Rashidi and Diane J Cook. 2011a. Activity knowledge transfer in smart environments. Pervasive and Mobile Computing 7, 3 (2011), 331–343.
  155. Parisa Rashidi and Diane J Cook. 2011b. Domain selection and adaptation in smart homes. In International Conference on Smart Homes and Health Telematics. Springer, 17–24.
  156. Attila Reiss and Didier Stricker. 2013. Personalized mobile physical activity recognition. (2013). https://doi.org/10.1145/2493988.2494349
  157. The adARC pattern analysis architecture for adaptive human activity recognition systems. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/S12652-011-0064-0
  158. Seyed Ali Rokni and Hassan Ghasemzadeh. 2016a. Autonomous sensor-context learning in dynamic human-centered Internet-of-Things environments. 2016 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Computer-Aided Design (ICCAD) (2016). https://doi.org/10.1145/2966986.2967008
  159. Seyed Ali Rokni and Hassan Ghasemzadeh. 2016b. Plug-n-learn: automatic learning of computational algorithms in human-centered internet-of-things applications. (2016). https://doi.org/10.1145/2897937.2898066
  160. Seyed Ali Rokni and Hassan Ghasemzadeh. 2017. Synchronous dynamic view learning: a framework for autonomous training of activity recognition models using wearable sensors. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1145/3055031.3055087
  161. Seyed Ali Rokni and Hassan Ghasemzadeh. 2018. Autonomous Training of Activity Recognition Algorithms in Mobile Sensors: A Transfer Learning Approach in Context-Invariant Views. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/TMC.2018.2789890
  162. Seyed Ali Rokni and Hassan Ghasemzadeh. 2019. Share-n-Learn. ACM Trans. Design Autom. Electr. Syst. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3318044
  163. TransNet: Minimally Supervised Deep Transfer Learning for Dynamic Adaptation of Wearable Systems. ACM Trans. Design Autom. Electr. Syst. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1145/3414062
  164. Personalized Human Activity Recognition Using Convolutional Neural Networks. (2018).
  165. Multi-task Self-Supervised Learning for Human Activity Detection. arXiv: Learning (2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3328932
  166. Ramyar Saeedi and A. Gebremedhin. 2020. A Signal-Level Transfer Learning Framework for Autonomous Reconfiguration of Wearable Systems. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/TMC.2018.2878673
  167. Transfer learning algorithms for autonomous reconfiguration of wearable systems. 2016 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data) (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/BIGDATA.2016.7840648
  168. A closed-loop deep learning architecture for robust activity recognition using wearable sensors. 2017 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data) (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/BIGDATA.2017.8257960
  169. Personalized Human Activity Recognition using Wearables: A Manifold Learning-based Knowledge Transfer. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/EMBC.2018.8512533
  170. Transferring activity recognition models in FOG computing architecture. J. Parallel and Distrib. Comput. 122 (2018), 122–130.
  171. Andrea Rosales Sanabria and Juan Ye. 2020. Unsupervised domain adaptation for activity recognition across heterogeneous datasets. Pervasive and Mobile Computing 64 (2020), 101147.
  172. ContrasGAN: Unsupervised domain adaptation in Human Activity Recognition via adversarial and contrastive learning. Pervasive and Mobile Computing (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PMCJ.2021.101477
  173. Unsupervised domain adaptation in activity recognition: A GAN-based approach. IEEE Access 9 (2021), 19421–19438.
  174. To Transfer or Not to Transfer and Why? Meta-Transfer Learning for Explainable and Controllable Cross-Individual Activity Recognition. Electronics (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/ELECTRONICS12102275
  175. Generic semi-supervised adversarial subject translation for sensor-based activity recognition. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.NEUCOM.2022.05.075
  176. Elnaz Soleimani and Ehsan Nazerfard. 2021. Cross-subject transfer learning in human activity recognition systems using generative adversarial networks. Neurocomputing 426 (2021), 26–34.
  177. Sonia Sonia and Rashmi Dutta Baruah. 2020. Transfer learning in smart home scenario. In 2020 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN). IEEE, 1–8.
  178. Adversarial Deep Feature Extraction Network for User Independent Human Activity Recognition. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1109/PERCOM53586.2022.9762387
  179. TASKED: Transformer-based Adversarial learning for human activity recognition using wearable sensors via Self-KnowledgE Distillation. Knowledge-Based Systems (2022). https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2209.09092
  180. Sanatan Sukhija. 2018. Label space driven feature space remapping. In Proceedings of the ACM India Joint International Conference on Data Science and Management of Data. 310–313.
  181. Sanatan Sukhija and Narayanan C Krishnan. 2019. Supervised heterogeneous feature transfer via random forests. Artificial Intelligence 268 (2019), 30–53.
  182. T. Sztyler and H. Stuckenschmidt. 2017. Online personalization of cross-subjects based activity recognition models on wearable devices. 2017 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications (PerCom) (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/PERCOM.2017.7917864
  183. A survey on deep transfer learning. In Artificial Neural Networks and Machine Learning–ICANN 2018: 27th International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks, Rhodes, Greece, October 4-7, 2018, Proceedings, Part III 27. Springer, 270–279.
  184. Cross-Domain HAR: Few Shot Transfer Learning for Human Activity Recognition. arXiv.org (2023). https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2310.14390
  185. Machine recognition of human activities: A survey. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video technology 18, 11 (2008), 1473–1488.
  186. Transferring knowledge of activity recognition across sensor networks. In Pervasive Computing: 8th International Conference, Pervasive 2010, Helsinki, Finland, May 17-20, 2010. Proceedings 8. Springer, 283–300.
  187. Recognizing Activities in Multiple Contexts using Transfer Learning.. In AAAI fall symposium: AI in eldercare: new solutions to old problems. 142–149.
  188. Accurate activity recognition in a home setting. In Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Ubiquitous computing. 1–9.
  189. Human activity recognition from wireless sensor network data: Benchmark and software. In Activity recognition in pervasive intelligent environments. Springer, 165–186.
  190. Human activity recognition using deep transfer learning of cross position sensor based on vertical distribution of data. Multimedia Tools and Applications (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/S11042-021-11131-4
  191. Sarvesh Vishwakarma and Anupam Agrawal. 2013. A survey on activity recognition and behavior understanding in video surveillance. The Visual Computer 29 (2013), 983–1009.
  192. Paul Voigt and Axel Von dem Bussche. 2017. The eu general data protection regulation (gdpr). A Practical Guide, 1st Ed., Cham: Springer International Publishing 10, 3152676 (2017), 10–5555.
  193. A review of human activity recognition methods. Frontiers in Robotics and AI 2 (2015), 28.
  194. Stratified Transfer Learning for Cross-domain Activity Recognition. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/PERCOM.2018.8444572
  195. Deep Transfer Learning for Cross-domain Activity Recognition. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3265689.3265705
  196. Wei Wang and Chunyan Miao. 2018. Activity recognition in new smart home environments. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Multimedia for Personal Health and Health Care. 29–37.
  197. Kernel fusion based extreme learning machine for cross-location activity recognition. Information Fusion (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.INFFUS.2017.01.004
  198. Instilling Social to Physical: Co-Regularized Heterogeneous Transfer Learning. AAAI (2016). https://doi.org/10.1609/AAAI.V30I1.10172
  199. A survey of transfer learning. Journal of Big data 3, 1 (2016), 1–40.
  200. Jiahui Wen. 2017. A framework for mobile activity recognition. (2017). https://doi.org/10.14264/UQL.2017.608
  201. Adaptive activity learning with dynamically available context. 2016 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications (PerCom) (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/PERCOM.2016.7456502
  202. Jiahui Wen and Zhiying Wang. 2017. Learning general model for activity recognition with limited labelled data. Expert Systems With Applications (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ESWA.2017.01.002
  203. Anjana Wijekoon and Nirmalie Wiratunga. 2020. Evaluating the Transferability of Personalised Exercise Recognition Models. Proceedings of the International Neural Networks Society (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48791-1_3
  204. Domain Adaptation Under Behavioral and Temporal Shifts for Natural Time Series Mobile Activity Recognition. ArXiv (2022). https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2207.04367
  205. Multi-Source Deep Domain Adaptation with Weak Supervision for Time-Series Sensor Data. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1145/3394486.3403228
  206. Learning Disentangled Representation for Mixed- Reality Human Activity Recognition With a Single IMU Sensor. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2021.3111996
  207. A Deep Learning Method for Complex Human Activity Recognition Using Virtual Wearable Sensors. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69873-7_19
  208. Deep Transfer Learning with Graph Neural Network for Sensor-Based Human Activity Recognition. IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (2022). https://doi.org/10.1109/BIBM55620.2022.9995660
  209. Juan Ye. 2018. SLearn: Shared learning human activity labels across multiple datasets. In 2018 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications (PerCom). IEEE, 1–10.
  210. XLearn: Learning activity labels across heterogeneous datasets. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology (TIST) 11, 2 (2020), 1–28.
  211. USMART: An unsupervised semantic mining activity recognition technique. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems (TiiS) 4, 4 (2014), 1–27.
  212. End-to-End Versatile Human Activity Recognition with Activity Image Transfer Learning. 2021 43rd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society (EMBC) (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/EMBC46164.2021.9629525
  213. Optimal search mapping among sensors in heterogeneous smart homes. Math. Biosci. Eng 20 (2023), 1960–1980.
  214. A fine-tuning based approach for daily activity recognition between smart homes. Applied Sciences 13, 9 (2023), 5706.
  215. Local Domain Adaptation for Cross-Domain Activity Recognition. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/THMS.2020.3039196
  216. Cross-mobile ELM based Activity Recognition. (2010). https://doi.org/10.4156/IJEI.VOL1.ISSUE1.3
  217. Cross-People Mobile-Phone Based Activity Recognition. IJCAI (2011). https://doi.org/10.5591/978-1-57735-516-8/IJCAI11-423
  218. Zhongkai Zhao and Tatsuhito Hasegawa. 2022. Domain-Robust Pre-Training Method for the Sensor-Based Human Activity Recognition. International Conference on Machine Learning and Computing (2022). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMLC56445.2022.9941291
  219. Cross-domain activity recognition. In Proceedings of the 11th international conference on Ubiquitous computing. 61–70.
  220. XHAR: Deep Domain Adaptation for Human Activity Recognition with Smart Devices. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/SECON48991.2020.9158431
  221. DMSTL: A Deep Multi-Scale Transfer Learning Framework for Unsupervised Cross-Position Human Activity Recognition. IEEE Internet of Things Journal (2023). https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2022.3204542
  222. A comprehensive survey on transfer learning. Proc. IEEE 109, 1 (2020), 43–76.
  223. Yeyun Zou and Qiyu Xie. 2020. A survey on VQA: Datasets and approaches. In 2020 2nd International Conference on Information Technology and Computer Application (ITCA). IEEE, 289–297.
User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (2)
  1. Sourish Gunesh Dhekane (3 papers)
  2. Thomas Ploetz (28 papers)
Citations (13)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets