Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
41 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
41 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
7 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Remote Sensing ChatGPT: Solving Remote Sensing Tasks with ChatGPT and Visual Models (2401.09083v1)

Published 17 Jan 2024 in cs.CV
Remote Sensing ChatGPT: Solving Remote Sensing Tasks with ChatGPT and Visual Models

Abstract: Recently, the flourishing LLMs(LLM), especially ChatGPT, have shown exceptional performance in language understanding, reasoning, and interaction, attracting users and researchers from multiple fields and domains. Although LLMs have shown great capacity to perform human-like task accomplishment in natural language and natural image, their potential in handling remote sensing interpretation tasks has not yet been fully explored. Moreover, the lack of automation in remote sensing task planning hinders the accessibility of remote sensing interpretation techniques, especially to non-remote sensing experts from multiple research fields. To this end, we present Remote Sensing ChatGPT, an LLM-powered agent that utilizes ChatGPT to connect various AI-based remote sensing models to solve complicated interpretation tasks. More specifically, given a user request and a remote sensing image, we utilized ChatGPT to understand user requests, perform task planning according to the tasks' functions, execute each subtask iteratively, and generate the final response according to the output of each subtask. Considering that LLM is trained with natural language and is not capable of directly perceiving visual concepts as contained in remote sensing images, we designed visual cues that inject visual information into ChatGPT. With Remote Sensing ChatGPT, users can simply send a remote sensing image with the corresponding request, and get the interpretation results as well as language feedback from Remote Sensing ChatGPT. Experiments and examples show that Remote Sensing ChatGPT can tackle a wide range of remote sensing tasks and can be extended to more tasks with more sophisticated models such as the remote sensing foundation model. The code and demo of Remote Sensing ChatGPT is publicly available at https://github.com/HaonanGuo/Remote-Sensing-ChatGPT .

Remote Sensing ChatGPT: Integration of LLMs with Remote Sensing Tasks

The paper "Remote Sensing ChatGPT: Solving Remote Sensing Tasks with ChatGPT and Visual Models" introduces an innovative approach for employing LLMs, specifically ChatGPT, to tackle complex interpretation tasks within the domain of remote sensing. This interdisciplinary effort aims to leverage the capabilities of ChatGPT in natural language understanding, reasoning, and interaction to enhance the automation and accessibility of remote sensing tasks, particularly for users who are not domain experts.

Overview of Remote Sensing ChatGPT

Remote Sensing ChatGPT is a system designed to interpret and respond to user requests by integrating a variety of AI-based remote sensing models. The system workflow involves several stages: prompt template generation, task planning, task execution, and response generation. This architecture allows the system to decompose complex tasks into manageable subtasks that are executed iteratively, providing a comprehensive interpretation of remote sensing imagery based on user queries.

  • Prompt Template Generation: Utilizes defined task libraries to generate a structured prompt, enabling ChatGPT to understand and plan the necessary interpretation tasks.
  • Task Planning and Execution: The system supports various remote sensing tasks such as scene classification, object detection, and image captioning. LLMs orchestrate these tasks based on user queries and the visual data provided, using models such as ResNet, YOLOv5, and BLIP.

To augment ChatGPT's ability to handle visual data, a technique is introduced that injects visual cues through the BLIP model, enabling the LLM to operate within a hybrid text-image framework.

Experimental Evaluation

The paper presents a systematic evaluation of Remote Sensing ChatGPT's task planning performance across different LLM configurations, notably gpt-3.5-turbo and gpt-4. Experiments across 138 user queries demonstrate an overall correctness rate of 94.9% when using gpt-3.5-turbo, indicating the model's efficacy in accurately interpreting and organizing remote sensing tasks. This approach highlights the advantages of using advanced LLMs in interpreting complex instructions and coordinating the execution of diverse tasks.

However, certain limitations are noted, particularly in unsupported task categories and instances where the LLM may fabricate details rather than seek additional information. Such challenges reaffirm the need for further refinement in prompt design and system capabilities.

Implications and Future Directions

The proposed Remote Sensing ChatGPT system holds significant implications for the field of remote sensing and beyond. By reducing dependence on human specialists for task planning, the system democratizes access to sophisticated image interpretation tools. This progress is particularly relevant for applications in environmental monitoring and disaster response, where timely and accurate data interpretation is crucial.

Future research directions may involve developing more robust open-vocabulary remote sensing models, enhancing the parameter efficiency of LLMs, and further integrating domain-specific foundation models. Such improvements could pave the way toward achieving fully automated remote sensing interpretation systems.

Conclusion

"Remote Sensing ChatGPT" represents a practical advancement in the integration of LLMs with remote sensing technologies. Through methodical task orchestration and leveraging LLMs' emergent capabilities, the system presents a promising venture into accessible and automated remote sensing interpretation. As AI models evolve, the enhancement of such interdisciplinary systems will no doubt contribute significantly to both theoretical advancements and practical applications across multiple research domains.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (6)
  1. Haonan Guo (11 papers)
  2. Xin Su (67 papers)
  3. Chen Wu (169 papers)
  4. Bo Du (263 papers)
  5. Liangpei Zhang (113 papers)
  6. Deren Li (14 papers)
Citations (7)