Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
143 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
46 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Phenotypic switching mechanisms determine the structure of cell migration into extracellular matrix under the `go-or-grow' hypothesis (2401.07279v2)

Published 14 Jan 2024 in q-bio.CB

Abstract: A fundamental feature of collective cell migration is phenotypic heterogeneity which, for example, influences tumour progression and relapse. While current mathematical models often consider discrete phenotypic structuring of the cell population, in-line with the `go-or-grow' hypothesis \cite{hatzikirou2012go, stepien2018traveling}, they regularly overlook the role that the environment may play in determining the cells' phenotype during migration. Comparing a previously studied volume-filling model for a homogeneous population of generalist cells that can proliferate, move and degrade extracellular matrix (ECM) \cite{crossley2023travelling} to a novel model for a heterogeneous population comprising two distinct sub-populations of specialist cells that can either move and degrade ECM or proliferate, this study explores how different hypothetical phenotypic switching mechanisms affect the speed and structure of the invading cell populations. Through a continuum model derived from its individual-based counterpart, insights into the influence of the ECM and the impact of phenotypic switching on migrating cell populations emerge. Notably, specialist cell populations that cannot switch phenotype show reduced invasiveness compared to generalist cell populations, while implementing different forms of switching significantly alters the structure of migrating cell fronts. This key result suggests that the structure of an invading cell population could be used to infer the underlying mechanisms governing phenotypic switching.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (60)
  1. ‘Go or grow’: the key to the emergence of invasion in tumour progression? Mathematical Medicine and Biology: A Journal of the IMA, 29(1):49–65, 2012.
  2. Traveling waves of a go-or-grow model of glioma growth. SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, 78(3):1778–1801, 2018.
  3. Traveling waves in a coarse-grained model of volume-filling cell invasion: Simulations and comparisons. Studies in Applied Mathematics, 151(4):1471–1497, 2023.
  4. Epigenetically heterogeneous tumor cells direct collective invasion through filopodia-driven fibronectin micropatterning. Science Advances, 6(30):eaaz6197, 2020.
  5. Dichotomy of astrocytoma migration and proliferation. International Journal of Cancer, 67(2):275–282, 1996.
  6. Migration of human glioma cells on myelin. Neurosurgery, 38(4):755–764, 1996.
  7. The impact of phenotypic heterogeneity on chemotactic self-organisation. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, 84(12):143, 2022.
  8. Invasion fronts and adaptive dynamics in a model for the growth of cell populations with heterogeneous mobility. European Journal of Applied Mathematics, 33(4):766–783, 2022.
  9. R. A. Fisher. The wave of advance of advantageous genes. Annals of Eugenics, 7(4):355–369, 1937.
  10. A study of the equation of diffusion with increase in the quantity of matter, and its application to a biological problem. Moskovskogo University Bulletin of Mathematics, 1(6):1–25, 1937.
  11. Image-guided genomics of phenotypically heterogeneous populations reveals vascular signalling during symbiotic collective cancer invasion. Nature Communications, 8(1):15078, 2017.
  12. Cooperation between melanoma cell states promotes metastasis through heterotypic cluster formation. Developmental Cell, 56(20):2808–2825, 2021.
  13. Modeling multiple taxis: tumor invasion with phenotypic heterogeneity, haptotaxis, and unilateral interspecies repellence. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 26(1):443–481, 2021.
  14. Density-dependent quiescence in glioma invasion: instability in a simple reaction–diffusion model for the migration/proliferation dichotomy. Journal of Biological Dynamics, 6(sup1):54–71, 2012.
  15. P. Gerlee and S. Nelander. The impact of phenotypic switching on glioblastoma growth and invasion. PLoS Computational Biology, 8(6):e1002556, 2012.
  16. P. Gerlee and S. Nelander. Travelling wave analysis of a mathematical model of glioblastoma growth. Mathematical Biosciences, 276:75–81, 2016.
  17. Speed switch in glioblastoma growth rate due to enhanced hypoxia-induced migration. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, 82(3):43, 2020.
  18. Traveling wave speed and profile of a “go or grow” glioblastoma multiforme model. Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, 118:107008, 2023.
  19. M. Conte and C. Surulescu. Mathematical modeling of glioma invasion: acid-and vasculature mediated go-or-grow dichotomy and the influence of tissue anisotropy. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 407:126305, 2021.
  20. Z. Werb. ECM and cell surface proteolysis: regulating cellular ecology. Cell, 91(4):439–442, 1997.
  21. New concepts regarding focal adhesion kinase promotion of cell migration and proliferation. Journal of Cellular Biochemistry, 99(1):35–52, 2006.
  22. Influence of the microenvironment on cell fate determination and migration. Physiological Genomics, 46(9):309–314, 2014.
  23. Genetic heterogeneity within collective invasion packs drives leader and follower cell phenotypes. Journal of Cell Science, 132(19):jcs231514, 2019.
  24. Neural crest migration is driven by a few trailblazer cells with a unique molecular signature narrowly confined to the invasive front. Development, 142(11):2014–2025, 2015.
  25. Examining go-or-grow using fluorescent cell-cycle indicators and cell-cycle-inhibiting drugs. Biophysical Journal, 118(6):1243–1247, 2020.
  26. Cell migration or cytokinesis and proliferation? – revisiting the “go or grow” hypothesis in cancer cells in vitro. Experimental Cell Research, 319(20):3094–3103, 2013.
  27. B. Alberts. Molecular Biology of the Cell. Garland Science, 2017.
  28. A. Gerisch and M. A. J. Chaplain. Mathematical modelling of cancer cell invasion of tissue: local and non-local models and the effect of adhesion. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 250(4):684–704, 2008.
  29. A Bayesian sequential learning framework to parameterise continuum models of melanoma invasion into human skin. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, 81(3):676–698, 2019.
  30. Local alignment vectors reveal cancer cell-induced ECM fiber remodeling dynamics. Scientific Reports, 7(1):39498, 2017.
  31. Concepts of extracellular matrix remodelling in tumour progression and metastasis. Nature Communications, 11(1):5120, 2020.
  32. Tumor cell interactions with the extracellular matrix during invasion and metastasis. Annual Review of Cell Biology, 9(1):541–573, 1993.
  33. M. A. J. Chaplain and G. Lolas. Mathematical modelling of cancer cell invasion of tissue: The role of the urokinase plasminogen activation system. Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences, 15(11):1685–1734, 2005.
  34. Matrix metalloproteinases: regulators of the tumor microenvironment. Cell, 141(1):52–67, 2010.
  35. Extracellular matrix concentration exerts selection pressure on invasive cells. European Journal of Cancer, 35(8):1274–1280, 1999.
  36. K. J. Painter. Modelling cell migration strategies in the extracellular matrix. Journal of Mathematical Biology, 58:511–543, 2009.
  37. Travelling wave analysis of cellular invasion into surrounding tissues. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 428:133026, 2021.
  38. Travelling-wave analysis of a model of tumour invasion with degenerate, cross-dependent diffusion. Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 477(2256):20210593, 2021.
  39. A model of cell migration within the extracellular matrix based on a phenotypic switching mechanism. Mathematical Medicine and Biology: A Journal of the IMA, 27(3):255–281, 2010.
  40. A multilayer grow-or-go model for GBM: effects of invasive cells and anti-angiogenesis on growth. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, 76:2306–2333, 2014.
  41. Cost of migration: invasion of malignant gliomas and implications for treatment. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 21(8):1624–1636, 2003.
  42. Multiscale mechanisms of cell migration during development: theory and experiment. Development, 139(16):2935–2944, 2012.
  43. Dynamic fibronectin assembly and remodeling by leader neural crest cells prevents jamming in collective cell migration. Elife, 12:e83792, 2023.
  44. P. Carmeliet and R. K. Jain. Molecular mechanisms and clinical applications of angiogenesis. Nature, 473(7347):298–307, 2011.
  45. Endothelial progenitor cell–derived microvesicles activate an angiogenic program in endothelial cells by a horizontal transfer of mRNA. Blood, The Journal of the American Society of Hematology, 110(7):2440–2448, 2007.
  46. Decoding leader cells in collective cancer invasion. Nature Reviews Cancer, 21(9):592–604, 2021.
  47. D. Tosh and J. M. W. Slack. How cells change their phenotype. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 3(3):187–194, 2002.
  48. Cellular phenotype switching and microvesicles. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 62(12):1141–1148, 2010.
  49. On interfaces between cell populations with different mobilities. Kinetic and Related Models, 10(1):299–311, 2017.
  50. D. Drasdo and S. Hoehme. Modeling the impact of granular embedding media, and pulling versus pushing cells on growing cell clones. New Journal of Physics, 14(5):055025, 2012.
  51. Tumor morphology and phenotypic evolution driven by selective pressure from the microenvironment. Cell, 127(5):905–915, 2006.
  52. A stochastic model for adhesion-mediated cell random motility and haptotaxis. Journal of Mathematical Biology, 31(6):563–600, 1993.
  53. Collagen biosynthesis by cells in a tissue equivalent matrix in vitro. Collagen and related research, 4(5):351–363, 1984.
  54. C. B. Weinberg and E. Bell. Regulation of proliferation of bovine aortic endothelial cells, smooth muscle cells, and adventitial fibroblasts in collagen lattices. Journal of Cellular Physiology, 122(3):410–414, 1985.
  55. Growth inhibition of human fibroblasts by reconstituted collagen fibrils. Biomedical research, 6(2):61–71, 1985.
  56. Building macroscale models from microscale probabilistic models: a general probabilistic approach for nonlinear diffusion and multispecies phenomena. Physical Review E, 84(4):041120, 2011.
  57. Multi-species simple exclusion processes. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 388(4):399–406, 2009.
  58. Mix and match: phenotypic coexistence as a key facilitator of cancer invasion. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, 82:1–26, 2020.
  59. Numerical solution of partial differential equations: an introduction. Cambridge University Press, 2005.
  60. G. L. Nicolson. Generation of phenotypic diversity and progression in metastatic tumor cells. Cancer and Metastasis Reviews, 3:25–42, 1984.
Citations (3)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.