Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
133 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
46 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Quantum Denoising Diffusion Models (2401.07049v1)

Published 13 Jan 2024 in quant-ph and cs.CV

Abstract: In recent years, machine learning models like DALL-E, Craiyon, and Stable Diffusion have gained significant attention for their ability to generate high-resolution images from concise descriptions. Concurrently, quantum computing is showing promising advances, especially with quantum machine learning which capitalizes on quantum mechanics to meet the increasing computational requirements of traditional machine learning algorithms. This paper explores the integration of quantum machine learning and variational quantum circuits to augment the efficacy of diffusion-based image generation models. Specifically, we address two challenges of classical diffusion models: their low sampling speed and the extensive parameter requirements. We introduce two quantum diffusion models and benchmark their capabilities against their classical counterparts using MNIST digits, Fashion MNIST, and CIFAR-10. Our models surpass the classical models with similar parameter counts in terms of performance metrics FID, SSIM, and PSNR. Moreover, we introduce a consistency model unitary single sampling architecture that combines the diffusion procedure into a single step, enabling a fast one-step image generation.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (55)
  1. Elementary gates for quantum computation. Physical Review A, 52(5):3457–3467, 1995.
  2. PennyLane: Automatic differentiation of hybrid quantum-classical computations, 2022.
  3. Quantum machine learning. Nature, 549(7671):195–202, 2017.
  4. Quantum convolutional neural networks. Nature Physics, 15(12):1273–1278, 2019.
  5. Efficient quantum state tomography. Nature communications, 1(1):149, 2010.
  6. Li Deng. The MNIST database of handwritten digit images for machine learning research. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 29(6):141–142, 2012.
  7. Diffusion models beat GANs on image synthesis, 2021.
  8. The importance of skip connections in biomedical image segmentation, 2016.
  9. Image generation: A review. Neural Processing Letters, 54, 2022.
  10. The holy grail of quantum artificial intelligence: Major challenges in accelerating the machine learning pipeline, 2020.
  11. Generative adversarial networks. Communications of the ACM, 63(11):139–144, 2020.
  12. Recent advances in convolutional neural networks, 2017.
  13. Fully dense U-Net for 2-d sparse photoacoustic tomography artifact removal. IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics, 24(2):568–576, 2019.
  14. Deep learning with limited numerical precision, 2015.
  15. Quanvolutional neural networks: Powering image recognition with quantum circuits, 2019.
  16. GANs trained by a two time-scale update rule converge to a local nash equilibrium, 2018.
  17. Denoising diffusion probabilistic models. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pages 6840–6851. Curran Associates, Inc., 2020.
  18. An introduction to image synthesis with generative adversarial nets, 2018.
  19. U-Net 3+: A full-scale connected U-Net for medical image segmentation. In ICASSP 2020-2020 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), pages 1055–1059. IEEE, 2020.
  20. Quantum denoising diffusion probabilistic models for image generation. In Korean Conference on Semiconductors, 2023.
  21. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization, 2017.
  22. Alex Krizhevsky. Learning multiple layers of features from tiny images. University of Toronto, 2012.
  23. Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. Communications of the ACM, 60(6):84–90, 2017.
  24. Improving convergence for quantum variational classifiers using weight re-mapping, 2022.
  25. Convolutional networks and applications in vision. In Proceedings of 2010 IEEE international symposium on circuits and systems, pages 253–256. IEEE, 2010.
  26. Tune: A research platform for distributed model selection and training. arXiv:1807.05118, 2018.
  27. An improved evaluation framework for generative adversarial networks, 2018.
  28. Quantum algorithms for supervised and unsupervised machine learning, 2013.
  29. Repaint: Inpainting using denoising diffusion probabilistic models. CoRR, abs/2201.09865, 2022.
  30. Improving diffusion model efficiency through patching, 2022.
  31. Quantum circuit learning. Physical Review A, 98(3), 2018.
  32. Transformation of quantum states using uniformly controlled rotations, 2004.
  33. Improved denoising diffusion probabilistic models, 2021.
  34. GLIDE: Towards photorealistic image generation and editing with text-guided diffusion models, 2022.
  35. A tutorial on quantum convolutional neural networks (QCNN), 2020.
  36. OpenAI. Gpt-4 technical report, 2023.
  37. Context encoders: Feature learning by inpainting. CoRR, abs/1604.07379, 2016.
  38. Data re-uploading for a universal quantum classifier. Quantum, 4:226, 2020.
  39. John Preskill. Quantum computing in the NISQ era and beyond. Quantum, 2:79, 2018.
  40. High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models, 2021.
  41. U-Net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation, 2015.
  42. Evaluating analytic gradients on quantum hardware. Physical Review A, 99(3), 2019.
  43. Circuit-centric quantum classifiers. Physical Review A, 101(3), 2020.
  44. Deep unsupervised learning using nonequilibrium thermodynamics. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 2256–2265. PMLR, 2015.
  45. Denoising diffusion implicit models, 2020.
  46. Consistency models, 2023.
  47. Andrew Steane. Quantum computing. Reports on Progress in Physics, 61(2):117–173, 1998.
  48. Going deeper with convolutions. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 1–9, 2015.
  49. Image super-resolution using dense skip connections. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision, pages 4799–4807, 2017.
  50. Attention is all you need, 2017.
  51. Accelerating deep convolutional networks using low-precision and sparsity, 2016.
  52. A quantum algorithm to train neural networks using low-depth circuits, 2019.
  53. Multiscale structural similarity for image quality assessment. In The Thrity-Seventh Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers, 2003, pages 1398–1402 Vol.2, 2003.
  54. Fashion-MNIST: a novel image dataset for benchmarking machine learning algorithms, 2017.
  55. Quantum state preparation with optimal circuit depth: Implementations and applications. Phys. Rev. Lett., 129:230504, 2022.
Citations (4)

Summary

  • The paper introduces novel quantum circuit-based architectures, Q-Dense and QU-Net, that achieve efficient image generation with fewer sampling steps.
  • It leverages variational quantum circuits to enhance performance metrics like FID, SSIM, and PSNR, outperforming classical diffusion models of similar size.
  • The innovative Unitary Single-Sampling approach consolidates iterative diffusion into a single operation, significantly accelerating the image generation process.

Analyzing Quantum Denoising Diffusion Models

The research paper titled "Quantum Denoising Diffusion Models" investigates quantum machine learning's (QML) intersection with denoising diffusion models (DDMs) for image generation. The authors propose novel architectures that harness quantum computing's potential to address limitations in classic diffusion models, such as slow sampling speeds and extensive parameter requirements. Their work introduces quantum diffusion models, notably Q-Dense and QU-Net, and a unitary single-sampling (USS) approach, aiming to demonstrate improved image quality and sampling efficiency.

Quantum Denoising Diffusion Models

The paper presents a significant advancement by integrating quantum principles into diffusion models. These models surpass traditional ones with comparable parameter counts in performance metrics, including Fréchet Inception Distance (FID), Structural Similarity Index Measure (SSIM), and Peak Signal-to-Noise Ratio (PSNR). The authors explore variational quantum circuits (VQCs) as function approximators to leverage computational efficiencies inherent in quantum mechanics, resulting in the Q-Dense and QU-Net architectures.

Core Innovations

  1. Integration of Quantum Computing: The implementation of quantum circuits enables a reduction in sampling steps, a critical enhancement over classical diffusion models. This quantum-augmented process stands to reduce computational costs and improve efficiency in generating high-quality images.
  2. Quantum Architectures: The paper introduces Q-Dense and QU-Net, utilizing dense quantum circuits and quantum convolutions, respectively. The proposed architectures exploit the entanglement and superposition properties of quantum mechanics, facilitating efficient data embedding and processing for image generation tasks.
  3. Unitary Single-Sampling (USS): This innovative approach merges the iterative diffusion sampling process into a single unitary operation, significantly speeding up image generation. By leveraging the unitary nature of quantum operations, USS offers a promising alternative to classical iterative procedures.

Experimental Validation

The researchers conducted extensive experiments using datasets like MNIST, Fashion MNIST, and CIFAR-10. They benchmarked their models against classical counterparts (U-Nets, deep convolutional networks) and previous quantum approaches (QDDPM). The results showed that quantum models not only outperformed classical models with similar parameter counts but also achieved competitive results with models double their size.

Implications for the Future

The paper's findings suggest promising avenues for future research, noting the potential for quantum machine learning to revolutionize generative modeling tasks. The integration of QML with DDMs points toward more efficient models that could alleviate traditional computational burdens. The quantum architectures proposed could serve as foundational elements for further explorations in the field, potentially extending beyond image generation to other data-rich domains requiring sophisticated modeling.

Conclusion

"Quantum Denoising Diffusion Models" significantly contributes to the intersection of quantum computing and generative modeling. The authors successfully identify and address key limitations of classical diffusion models and illustrate the efficacy of quantum-enhanced architectures. Moving forward, advancements in quantum hardware and improved simulation techniques could further enhance the practical viability of these models, suggesting a pertinent role for QML in the progressing landscape of artificial intelligence.

Youtube Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com