Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Detecting the presence of sperm whales echolocation clicks in noisy environments

Published 31 Dec 2023 in eess.AS, cs.LG, and cs.SD | (2401.00900v1)

Abstract: Sperm whales (Physeter macrocephalus) navigate underwater with a series of impulsive, click-like sounds known as echolocation clicks. These clicks are characterized by a multipulse structure (MPS) that serves as a distinctive pattern. In this work, we use the stability of the MPS as a detection metric for recognizing and classifying the presence of clicks in noisy environments. To distinguish between noise transients and to handle simultaneous emissions from multiple sperm whales, our approach clusters a time series of MPS measures while removing potential clicks that do not fulfil the limits of inter-click interval, duration and spectrum. As a result, our approach can handle high noise transients and low signal-to-noise ratio. The performance of our detection approach is examined using three datasets: seven months of recordings from the Mediterranean Sea containing manually verified ambient noise; several days of manually labelled data collected from the Dominica Island containing approximately 40,000 clicks from multiple sperm whales; and a dataset from the Bahamas containing 1,203 labelled clicks from a single sperm whale. Comparing with the results of two benchmark detectors, a better trade-off between precision and recall is observed as well as a significant reduction in false detection rates, especially in noisy environments. To ensure reproducibility, we provide our database of labelled clicks along with our implementation code.

Authors (2)
Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (54)
  1. Inter-pulse estimation for sperm whale click detection. In ICASSP 2023-2023 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), pages 1–5. IEEE, 2023.
  2. Brain structure and intelligence in cetaceans. Whales and dolphins: Cognition, culture, conservation and human perceptions, pages 115–128, 2011.
  3. Sperm whale codas. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 62(6):1485–1490, 1977.
  4. Individual, unit and vocal clan level identity cues in sperm whale codas. Royal Society Open Science, 3(1):150372, 2016.
  5. The long-range echo scene of the sperm whale biosonar. Biology letters, 16(8):20200134, 2020.
  6. Cetacean translation initiative: a roadmap to deciphering the communication of sperm whales. arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.08614, 2021.
  7. Time and frequency domain characteristics of sperm whale clicks. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 98(3):1279–1291, 1995.
  8. Off-axis effects on the multipulse structure of sperm whale usual clicks with implications for sound production. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 118(5):3337–3345, 2005.
  9. Streamlining analysis methods for large acoustic surveys using automatic detectors with operator validation. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 13(8):1765–1777, 2022.
  10. A first acoustic density estimate for sperm whales in irish offshore waters. Journal of Cetacean Research Management, 2020.
  11. Abundance estimates for sperm whales in the mediterranean sea from acoustic line-transect surveys. J. Cetacean Res. Manage., 18(1):103–117, 2018.
  12. An efficient statistics-based method for the automated detection of sperm whale clicks. Applied acoustics, 71(5):451–459, 2010.
  13. Classification of echolocation clicks from odontocetes in the southern california bight. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 129(1):467–475, 2011.
  14. Classification of sperm whale clicks (physeter macrocephalus) with gaussian-kernel-based networks. Algorithms, 2(3):1232–1247, 2009.
  15. Emerging opportunities and challenges for passive acoustics in ecological assessment and monitoring. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 10(2):169–185, 2019.
  16. Stochastic matched filter outperforms teager-kaiser-mallat for tracking a plurality of sperm whales. In 2008 New Trends for Environmental Monitoring Using Passive Systems, pages 1–9. IEEE, 2008.
  17. V Kandia and Y Stylianou. Detection of sperm whale clicks based on the teager–kaiser energy operator. Applied Acoustics, 67(11-12):1144–1163, 2006.
  18. Adaptive energy-based acoustic sperm whale echolocation click detection. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, 40(4):957–968, 2014.
  19. Jamie Donald John Macaulay. Passive acoustic monitoring of harbour porpoise behaviour, distribution and density in tidal rapid habitats. PhD thesis, University of St Andrews, 2020.
  20. A real-time acoustic observatory for sperm-whale localization in the eastern mediterranean sea. Frontiers in Marine Science, page 674, 2022.
  21. Paul M Baggenstoss. An algorithm for the localization of multiple interfering sperm whales using multi-sensor time difference of arrival. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 130(1):102–112, 2011.
  22. Kaitlin E Frasier. A machine learning pipeline for classification of cetacean echolocation clicks in large underwater acoustic datasets. PLoS Computational Biology, 17(12):e1009613, 2021.
  23. A description of echolocation clicks recorded in the presence of true’s beaked whale (mesoplodon mirus). The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 144(5):2691–2700, 2018.
  24. Species-specific beaked whale echolocation signals. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 134(3):2293–2301, 2013.
  25. Field assessment of c-pod performance in detecting echolocation click trains of bottlenose dolphins (tursiops truncatus). Marine Mammal Science, 31(1):169–190, 2015.
  26. Rhythmic analysis for click train detection and source separation with examples on beluga whales. Applied Acoustics, 95:37–49, 2015.
  27. Techniques for segregation and classification of several vocalizing sperm whales for auv-based localization applications. In Oceans 2003. Celebrating the Past… Teaming Toward the Future (IEEE Cat. No. 03CH37492), volume 1, pages 457–463. IEEE, 2003.
  28. Measuring the off-axis angle and the rotational movements of phonating sperm whales using a single hydrophone. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119(6):4074–4082, 2006.
  29. Jonathan CD Gordon. Evaluation of a method for determining the length of sperm whales (physeter catodon) from their vocalizations. Journal of Zoology, 224(2):301–314, 1991.
  30. Measuring inter-pulse intervals in sperm whale clicks: Consistency of automatic estimation methods. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 127(5):3239–3247, 2010.
  31. Size distribution of sperm whales acoustically identified during long term deep-sea monitoring in the ionian sea. PLoS One, 10(12):e0144503, 2015.
  32. Software tools for real-time ipi measurements on sperm whale sounds. Proceedings-Institute of Acoustics, 19:157–164, 1997.
  33. Themo: The texas a&m-university of haifa-eastern mediterranean observatory. In 2018 OCEANS-MTS/IEEE Kobe Techno-Oceans (OTO), pages 1–5. IEEE, 2018.
  34. Link to implementation code and database [online]. available at:. https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1HkGZcpYbrft3pGtqdt45bUZXVcrJVrdm?usp=sharing.
  35. Deep machine learning techniques for the detection and classification of sperm whale bioacoustics. Scientific reports, 9(1):1–10, 2019.
  36. Olivier Adam. The use of the hilbert-huang transform to analyze transient signals emitted by sperm whales. Applied Acoustics, 67(11-12):1134–1143, 2006.
  37. Real-time acoustic classification of sperm whale clicks and shipping impulses from deep-sea observatories. Applied Acoustics, 71(11):1011–1019, 2010.
  38. Automated detection of sperm whale sounds as a function of abrupt changes in sound intensity. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 113(4):2307–2307, 2003.
  39. Sperm whale click analysis using a recursive time-variant lattice filter. Applied acoustics, 67(11-12):1118–1133, 2006.
  40. Coleman Levenson. Source level and bistatic target strength of the sperm whale (physeter catodon) measured from an oceanographic aircraft. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 55(5):1100–1103, 1974.
  41. James F Kaiser. On a simple algorithm to calculate the’energy’of a signal. In International conference on acoustics, speech, and signal processing, pages 381–384. IEEE, 1990.
  42. The energy ratio mapping algorithm: A tool to improve the energy-based detection of odontocete echolocation clicks. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 129(4):1807–1812, 2011.
  43. Automatic detection of echolocation clicks based on a gabor model of their waveform. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 137(6):3077–3086, 2015.
  44. Paul M Baggenstoss. Separation of sperm whale click-trains for multipath rejection. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 129(6):3598–3609, 2011.
  45. Extraction of pulse repetition intervals from sperm whale click trains for ocean acoustic data mining. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 133(2):902–911, 2013.
  46. John C Goold. Signal processing techniques for acoustic measurement of sperm whale body lengths. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 100(5):3431–3441, 1996.
  47. Measuring sperm whales from their clicks: Stability of interpulse intervals and validation that they indicate whale length. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 115(4):1826–1831, 2004.
  48. Sperm whale behaviour indicates the use of echolocation click buzzes ‘creaks’ in prey capture. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 271(1554):2239–2247, 2004.
  49. http://www.mobysound.org/workshops.html.
  50. A phase based detector of whale clicks. In 2008 New Trends for Environmental Monitoring Using Passive Systems, pages 1–6. IEEE, 2008.
  51. Detedit: A graphical user interface for annotating and editing events detected in long-term acoustic monitoring data. PLoS computational biology, 16(1):e1007598, 2020.
  52. Species-level classification of beaked whale echolocation signals detected in the northern gulf of mexico. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 144(1):387–396, 2018.
  53. Time-frequency super-resolution with superlets. Nature communications, 12(1):1–18, 2021.
  54. Pamguard: Semiautomated, open source software for real-time acoustic detection and localization of cetaceans. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 125(4_Supplement):2547–2547, 2009.
Citations (2)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.