Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
158 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

On Learning for Ambiguous Chance Constrained Problems (2401.00547v2)

Published 31 Dec 2023 in cs.LG and math.OC

Abstract: We study chance constrained optimization problems $\min_x f(x)$ s.t. $P(\left{ \theta: g(x,\theta)\le 0 \right})\ge 1-\epsilon$ where $\epsilon\in (0,1)$ is the violation probability, when the distribution $P$ is not known to the decision maker (DM). When the DM has access to a set of distributions $\mathcal{U}$ such that $P$ is contained in $\mathcal{U}$, then the problem is known as the ambiguous chance-constrained problem \cite{erdougan2006ambiguous}. We study ambiguous chance-constrained problem for the case when $\mathcal{U}$ is of the form $\left{\mu:\frac{\mu (y)}{\nu(y)}\leq C, \forall y\in\Theta, \mu(y)\ge 0\right}$, where $\nu$ is a reference distribution.'' We show that in this case the original problem can bewell-approximated'' by a sampled problem in which $N$ i.i.d. samples of $\theta$ are drawn from $\nu$, and the original constraint is replaced with $g(x,\theta_i)\le 0,~i=1,2,\ldots,N$. We also derive the sample complexity associated with this approximation, i.e., for $\epsilon,\delta>0$ the number of samples which must be drawn from $\nu$ so that with a probability greater than $1-\delta$ (over the randomness of $\nu$), the solution obtained by solving the sampled program yields an $\epsilon$-feasible solution for the original chance constrained problem.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (9)
  1. E. Erdoğan and G. Iyengar, “Ambiguous chance constrained problems and robust optimization,” Mathematical Programming, vol. 107, pp. 37–61, 2006.
  2. M. C. Campi and S. Garatti, “The exact feasibility of randomized solutions of uncertain convex programs,” SIAM Journal on Optimization, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 1211–1230, 2008.
  3. M. Vidyasagar, “Statistical learning theory and randomized algorithms for control,” IEEE Control Systems Magazine, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 69–85, 1998.
  4. M. C. Campi, S. Garatti, and F. A. Ramponi, “A general scenario theory for nonconvex optimization and decision making,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 63, no. 12, pp. 4067–4078, 2018.
  5. A. Ben-Tal and A. Nemirovski, “Robust convex optimization,” Mathematics of operations research, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 769–805, 1998.
  6. H.-G. Beyer and B. Sendhoff, “Robust optimization–a comprehensive survey,” Computer methods in applied mechanics and engineering, vol. 196, no. 33-34, pp. 3190–3218, 2007.
  7. A. Ruszczyński and A. Shapiro, “Stochastic programming models,” Handbooks in operations research and management science, vol. 10, 2003.
  8. G. Calafiore and M. C. Campi, “Uncertain convex programs: randomized solutions and confidence levels,” Mathematical Programming, vol. 102, pp. 25–46, 2005.
  9. W. Hoeffding, “Probability inequalities for sums of bounded random variables,” The collected works of Wassily Hoeffding, pp. 409–426, 1994.
Citations (1)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.