Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
166 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
42 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

PINN surrogate of Li-ion battery models for parameter inference. Part II: Regularization and application of the pseudo-2D model (2312.17336v3)

Published 28 Dec 2023 in cs.LG and physics.app-ph

Abstract: Bayesian parameter inference is useful to improve Li-ion battery diagnostics and can help formulate battery aging models. However, it is computationally intensive and cannot be easily repeated for multiple cycles, multiple operating conditions, or multiple replicate cells. To reduce the computational cost of Bayesian calibration, numerical solvers for physics-based models can be replaced with faster surrogates. A physics-informed neural network (PINN) is developed as a surrogate for the pseudo-2D (P2D) battery model calibration. For the P2D surrogate, additional training regularization was needed as compared to the PINN single-particle model (SPM) developed in Part I. Both the PINN SPM and P2D surrogate models are exercised for parameter inference and compared to data obtained from a direct numerical solution of the governing equations. A parameter inference study highlights the ability to use these PINNs to calibrate scaling parameters for the cathode Li diffusion and the anode exchange current density. By realizing computational speed-ups of 2250x for the P2D model, as compared to using standard integrating methods, the PINN surrogates enable rapid state-of-health diagnostics. In the low-data availability scenario, the testing error was estimated to 2mV for the SPM surrogate and 10mV for the P2D surrogate which could be mitigated with additional data.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (84)
  1. Unlocking extra value from grid batteries using advanced models. J. Power Sources, 487:229355, 2021.
  2. Lithium ion battery degradation: what you need to know. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 23:8200–8221, 2021.
  3. Bayesian parameter identification in electrochemical model for lihtium-ion batteries. J. Energy Storage, 71:108129, 2023.
  4. Simulation and optimization of the dual lithium insertion cell. J. Electrochem. Soc., 141:1–10, 1994.
  5. Mathematical modeling of the lithium deposition overcharge reaction in lithium-ion batteries using carbon-based negative electrodes. J. Electrochem. Soc., 146:3453–3553, 1999.
  6. Review of models for predicting the cycling performance of lithium ion batteries. J. Power Sources, 156:620–628, 2006.
  7. Requirements for enabling extreme fast charging of high energy density Li-ion cells while avoiding lithium plating. J. Electrochem. Soc., 166:A1412–A1424, 2019.
  8. Battery state-of-health diagnostics during fast cycling using physics-informed deep-learning. J. Power Sources, 2023.
  9. A review of the features and analysis of the solid electrolyte interphase in Li-ion cells. Electrochim. Acta, 55:6332–6341, 2010.
  10. How do depth of discharge, C-rate and calendar age affect capacity retention, impedance growth, the electrodes and the electrolyte in Li-ion cells? J. Electrochem. Soc., 169:020518, 2022.
  11. Enabling extreme fast-charging: Challenges at the cathode and mitigation strategies. Adv. Energy Mater., 12:2202795, 2022.
  12. A comprehensive understanding of the agin effects of extreme fast charging on high Ni NMC cathode. Adv. Energy Mater., 12:2103712, 2022.
  13. Reversible and irreversible expansion of lithium-ion batteries under a wide range of stress factors. J. Electrochem. Soc., 168:100520, 2021.
  14. Quantification of heterogeneous, irreversible lithium plating in extreme fast charging of lithium-ion batteries. Energy Environ. Sci., 14:4979, 2021.
  15. Developing extreme fast charge battery protocols – A review spanning materials to systems. J. Power Sources, 526:231129, 2022.
  16. Degradation diagnostics for lithium ion cells. J. Power Sources, 341:373–386, 2017.
  17. Aging mechanisms in lithium-ion batteries. J. Power Sources, 147:269–281, 2005.
  18. Review of computational parameter estimation methods for electrochemical models. J. Energy Storage, 44:103388, 2021.
  19. Cell discharge testing to calibrate a positive-electrode open-circuit-potential model for lithium-ion cells. J. Electrochem. Soc., 169:070524, 2022.
  20. Study of electrolyte and electrode composition changes vs time in aged Li-ion cells. J. Electrochem. Soc., 168:020532, 2021.
  21. Ultra high-precision studies of degradation mechanisms in aged LiCO22{}_{2}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT/graphite Li-ion cells. J. Electrochem. Soc., 161:A1572, 2014.
  22. Extreme fast charge aging: Correlation between electrode scale and heterogeneous degradation in Ni-rich layered cathodes. J. Power Sources, 521:230961, 2022.
  23. Battery capacity fading estimation using a force-based incremental capacity analysis. J. Electrochem. Soc., 163:A1584, 2016.
  24. M. Dubarry and D. Beck. Perspecitve on mechanistic modeling of Li-ion batteries. Acc. Mater. Res., 3(8):843–853, 2022.
  25. The challenge and opprotunity of battery lifetime prediction from field data. Joule, 5:1934–1955, 2021.
  26. Electrode state of health estimation for lithium ion batteries considering half-cell potential changes due to aging. J. Electrochem. Soc., 167:090531, 2020.
  27. Li-ion battery degradation modes diagnosis via convolutional neural networks. J. Energy Storage, 55:105558, 2022.
  28. M. Dubarry and D. Anseán. Best practices for incremental capacity analysis. Front. Energy Res., 10, 2022.
  29. A phenomenological degradation model for cyclic aging of lithium ion cell materials. J. Electrochem. Soc., 160:A125, 2013.
  30. Theory of SEI formation in rechargeable batteries: capacity fade, accelerated aging and lifetime prediction. J. Electrochem. Soc., 160:A243–A250, 2013.
  31. Accelerated battery lifetime simuations using adaptive inter-cycle extrapolation. J. Electrochem. Soc., 168:120531, 2021.
  32. Simulation of impedance changes with aging in lithium titanate-based cells using physics-based dimensionless modeling. J. Electrochem. Soc., 170:090519, 2023.
  33. Parameterization of physics-based battery models from input-output data: A review of methodology and current research. J. Power Sources, 521:230859, 2022.
  34. Data-driven systematic parameter identification of an electrochemical model for lithium-ion batteries with artificial intelligence. Energy Storage Mater., 44:557–570, 2022.
  35. Machine-learning assisted identification of accurate battery lifetime models with uncertainty. J. Electrochem. Soc., 169:080518, 2022.
  36. Bayesian parameter estimation applied to the Li-ion battery single particle model with electrolyte dynamics. IFAC PapersOnLine, 53:12497–12504, 2020.
  37. Parallelized genetic identification of thermal-electrochemical model for lithium-ion battery. Adv. Mech. Eng., 5:754653, 2013.
  38. Accelerating parameter estimation in Doyle–Fuller–Newman model for lithium-ion batteries. COMPEL - Int. J. Comput. Math., 2019.
  39. On uncertainty quantification of lithium-ion batteries: Application to an lic6/licoo2 cell. Journal of Power Sources, 300:507–524, 2015.
  40. P. Constantine and A. Doostan. Time-dependent global sensitivity analysis with active subspaces for a lithium ion battery model. Statistical Analysis and Data Mining: The ASA Data Science Journal, 10(5):243–262, 2017.
  41. Adversarial sampling of unknown and high-dimensional conditional distributions. J. Comput. Phys., 450:110853, 2022.
  42. Massively distributed bayesian analysis of electric aircraft battery degradation. ACS Energy Lett., 8:3578–3585, 2023.
  43. Identifiability and parameter estimation of the single particle lithium-ion battery model. IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol., 27(5):1862–1877, 2018.
  44. Physics-informed neural networks: A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations. J. Comput. Phys., 378:686–707, 2019.
  45. Physics-constrained deep neural network method for estimating parameters in a redox flow battery. J. Power Sources, 528:231147, 2022.
  46. Physics-informed machine learning of redox flow battery based on a two-dimensional unit cell model. J. Power Sources, 584:233548, 2023.
  47. Hybrid modeling of lithium-ion battery: physics-informed neural network for battery state estimation. Batteries, 9(6):301, 2023.
  48. Fusing Models for Prognostics and Health Management of Lithium-Ion Batteries Based on Physics-Informed Neural Networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.00776, 2023.
  49. Massively distributed bayesian analysis of electric aircraft battery degradation. ACS Energy Lett., 8(8):3578–3585, 2023.
  50. Bayesian parameter estimation applied to the Li-ion battery single particle model with electrolyte dynamics. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 53(2):12497–12504, 2020.
  51. Parameter estimation and capacity fade analysis of lithium-ion batteries using reformulated models. J. Electrochem. Soc., 158(9):A1048, 2011.
  52. Surface chemistry models for GaAs epitaxial growth and hydride cracking using reacting flow simulations. J. Appl. Phys., 130(11), 2021.
  53. Bayesian analysis of syngas chemistry models. Combust. Theory Model, 17(5):858–887, 2013.
  54. Luke Tierney. Markov chains for exploring posterior distributions. Ann. Stat., pages 1701–1728, 1994.
  55. Simple conditions for the convergence of the Gibbs sampler and Metropolis-Hastings algorithms. Stochastic Process. Appl., 49(2):207–216, 1994.
  56. Weak convergence and optimal scaling of random walk Metropolis algorithms. Ann. Appl. Probab., 7(1):110–120, 1997.
  57. Modeling of galvanostatic charge and discharge of the lithium/polymer/insertion cell. J. Electrochem. Soc, 140:1526–1533, 1993.
  58. Relaxation phenomena in lithium-ion-insertion cells. J. Electrochem. Soc., 141:982–990, 1994.
  59. The use of mathematical modeling in the design of lithium/polymer battery systems. Electrochem. Acta, 40:2191–2196, 1995.
  60. J. Newman and K.E. Thomas-Alyea. Electrochemical systems. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, 2004.
  61. Thermodynamically consistent modeling of elementary electrochemistry in lithium-ion batteries. Electrochim. Acta, 55:8960–8973, 2010.
  62. Multi-domain modeling of lithium-ion batteries encompassing multi-physics in varied length scales. J. Electrochem. Soc., 158:A955–A969, 2011.
  63. L. Rao and J. Newman. Heat-generation rate and general energy balance for insertion battery systems. J. Electrochem. Soc., 144:2697–2704, 1997.
  64. P.J. Weddle. Developing and identifying physically based Li-ion battery models to inform real-time control applications. Colorado School of Mines Arthur Lakes Library, 2019.
  65. Electrode scale and electrolyte transport effects on extreme fast charging of lithium-ion cells. Electrochem. Acta, 337:135854, 2020.
  66. Single-particle model for a lithium-ion cell: Thermal behavior. J. Electrochem. Soc., 158:A122–A132, 2011.
  67. Multiphase porous electrode theory. J. Electrochem. Soc., pages E3291–E3310, 2017.
  68. Surrogate modeling for fluid flows based on physics-constrained deep learning without simulation data. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 361:112732, 2020.
  69. Understanding and mitigating gradient flow pathologies in physics-informed neural networks. SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 43(5):A3055–A3081, 2021.
  70. Entropy-stable schemes in the low-Mach-number regime: Flux-preconditioning, entropy breakdowns, and entropy transfers. J. Comput. Phys., 456:111036, 2022.
  71. Y. Morinishi. Skew-symmetric form of convective terms and fully conservative finite difference schemes for variable density low-Mach number flows. J. Comput. Phys., 229(2):276–300, 2010.
  72. A minimally-dissipative low-Mach number solver for complex reacting flows in OpenFOAM. Comput. Fluids, 162:11–25, 2018.
  73. Gradient-enhanced physics-informed neural networks for forward and inverse PDE problems. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 393:114823, 2022.
  74. Learning from Integral Losses in Physics Informed Neural Networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.17387, 2023.
  75. Neural Implicit Flow: a mesh-agnostic dimensionality reduction paradigm of spatio-temporal data. arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.03216, 2022.
  76. Bi-fidelity modeling of uncertain and partially unknown systems using DeepONets. Comput. Mech., 71(6):1251–1267, 2023.
  77. Learning nonlinear operators via deeponet based on the universal approximation theorem of operators. Nat. Mach. Intell., 3(3):218–229, 2021.
  78. The No-U-Turn sampler: adaptively setting path lengths in Hamiltonian Monte Carlo. J. Mach. Learn. Res., 15(1):1593–1623, 2014.
  79. Composable effects for flexible and accelerated probabilistic programming in NumPyro. arXiv preprint arXiv:1912.11554, 2019.
  80. Galvanostatic intermittent titration and performance based analysis of LiNi0.50.5{}_{0.5}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 0.5 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTCo0.20.2{}_{0.2}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 0.2 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTMn0.30.3{}_{0.3}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 0.3 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPTO22{}_{2}start_FLOATSUBSCRIPT 2 end_FLOATSUBSCRIPT cathode. J. Electrochem. Soc., 164:A3380–A3392, 2017.
  81. The geometry of sloppiness. arXiv preprint arXiv:1608.05679, 2016.
  82. Analysis of sloppiness in model simulations: Unveiling parameter uncertainty when mathematical models are fitted to data. Sci. Adv., 8:1–19, 2022.
  83. Automatic differentiation in machine learning: a survey. Journal of Marchine Learning Research, 18:1–43, 2018.
  84. Battery state estimation for a single particle model with electrolyte dynamics. IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol., 25(2):453–468, 2016.
Citations (4)
View on Semantic Scholar

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Summarize Now