Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
156 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Towards Understanding Underwater Weather Events in Rivers Using Autonomous Surface Vehicles (2312.14248v1)

Published 21 Dec 2023 in cs.RO

Abstract: Climate change has increased the frequency and severity of extreme weather events such as hurricanes and winter storms. The complex interplay of floods with tides, runoff, and sediment creates additional hazards -- including erosion and the undermining of urban infrastructure -- consequently impacting the health of our rivers and ecosystems. Observations of these underwater phenomena are rare, because satellites and sensors mounted on aerial vehicles cannot penetrate the murky waters. Autonomous Surface Vehicles (ASVs) provides a means to track and map these complex and dynamic underwater phenomena. This work highlights preliminary results of high-resolution data gathering with ASVs, equipped with a suite of sensors capable of measuring physical and chemical parameters of the river. Measurements were acquired along the lower Schuylkill River in the Philadelphia area at high-tide and low-tide conditions. The data will be leveraged to improve our understanding of changes in bathymetry due to floods; the dynamics of mixing and stagnation zones and their impact on water quality; and the dynamics of suspension and resuspension of fine sediment. The data will also provide insight into the development of adaptive sampling strategies for ASVs that can maximize the information gain for future field experiments.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (38)
  1. E. V. Balian, H. Segers, K. Martens, and C. Lévéque, “The freshwater animal diversity assessment: an overview of the results,” Freshwater animal diversity assessment, pp. 627–637, 2007.
  2. M. G. Macklin and J. Lewin, “The rivers of civilization,” Quaternary Science Reviews, vol. 114, pp. 228–244, 2015.
  3. C. J. Vörösmarty, P. B. McIntyre, M. O. Gessner, D. Dudgeon, A. Prusevich, P. Green, S. Glidden, S. E. Bunn, C. A. Sullivan, C. R. Liermann et al., “Global threats to human water security and river biodiversity,” nature, vol. 467, no. 7315, pp. 555–561, 2010.
  4. J. Best, “Anthropogenic stresses on the world’s big rivers,” Nature Geoscience, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 7–21, 2019.
  5. J. Opperman, G. Grill, and J. Hartmann, “The power of rivers: Finding balance between energy and conservation in hydropower development.” 2017.
  6. E. M. Latrubesse, E. Y. Arima, T. Dunne, E. Park, V. R. Baker, F. M. d’Horta, C. Wight, F. Wittmann, J. Zuanon, P. A. Baker et al., “Damming the rivers of the amazon basin,” Nature, vol. 546, no. 7658, pp. 363–369, 2017.
  7. J. P. Syvitski, C. J. Vorosmarty, A. J. Kettner, and P. Green, “Impact of humans on the flux of terrestrial sediment to the global coastal ocean,” science, vol. 308, no. 5720, pp. 376–380, 2005.
  8. R. C. Walter and D. J. Merritts, “Natural streams and the legacy of water-powered mills,” Science, vol. 319, no. 5861, pp. 299–304, 2008.
  9. M. A. Palmer, E. Bernhardt, J. Allan, P. S. Lake, G. Alexander, S. Brooks, J. Carr, S. Clayton, C. Dahm, J. Follstad Shah et al., “Standards for ecologically successful river restoration,” Journal of applied ecology, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 208–217, 2005.
  10. E. Wohl, S. N. Lane, and A. C. Wilcox, “The science and practice of river restoration,” Water Resources Research, vol. 51, no. 8, pp. 5974–5997, 2015.
  11. L. J. Slater and M. B. Singer, “Imprint of climate and climate change in alluvial riverbeds: Continental united states, 1950-2011,” Geology, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 595–598, 2013.
  12. L. J. Slater, M. B. Singer, and J. W. Kirchner, “Hydrologic versus geomorphic drivers of trends in flood hazard,” Geophysical Research Letters, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 370–376, 2015.
  13. L. Slater, A. Khouakhi, and R. Wilby, “River channel conveyance capacity adjusts to modes of climate variability,” Scientific reports, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2019.
  14. Z. Yang, T. Wang, N. Voisin, and A. Copping, “Estuarine response to river flow and sea-level rise under future climate change and human development,” Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, vol. 156, pp. 19–30, 2015.
  15. M. Garcia, “Sedimentation engineering: processes, measurements, modeling, and practice.”   American Society of Civil Engineers, 2008.
  16. S. Du, T. J. Belton, and L. A. Rodenburg, “Source apportionment of polychlorinated biphenyls in the tidal delaware river,” Environmental science & technology, vol. 42, no. 11, pp. 4044–4051, 2008.
  17. W. R. Geyer and P. MacCready, “The estuarine circulation,” Annual review of fluid mechanics, vol. 46, pp. 175–197, 2014.
  18. J. C. Winterwerp, “On the flocculation and settling velocity of estuarine mud,” Continental shelf research, vol. 22, no. 9, pp. 1339–1360, 2002.
  19. L. J. Slater, B. Anderson, M. Buechel, S. Dadson, S. Han, S. Harrigan, T. Kelder, K. Kowal, T. Lees, T. Matthews et al., “Nonstationary weather and water extremes: a review of methods for their detection, attribution, and management,” Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, vol. 25, no. 7, pp. 3897–3935, 2021.
  20. C. Soulsby, A. Youngson, H. Moir, and I. Malcolm, “Fine sediment influence on salmonid spawning habitat in a lowland agricultural stream: a preliminary assessment,” Science of the Total Environment, vol. 265, no. 1-3, pp. 295–307, 2001.
  21. R. Monroe, “Underwater weather,” Weatherwise, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 14–21, 2002.
  22. G. Hitz, F. Pomerleau, M.-E. Garneau, C. Pradalier, T. Posch, J. Pernthaler, and R. Y. Siegwart, “Autonomous inland water monitoring: Design and application of a surface vessel,” IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 62–72, 2012.
  23. F. Fornai, G. Ferri, A. Manzi, F. Ciuchi, F. Bartaloni, and C. Laschi, “An autonomous water monitoring and sampling system for small-sized asvs,” IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 5–12, 2017.
  24. S. Manjanna, A. Q. Li, R. N. Smith, I. Rekleitis, and G. Dudek, “Heterogeneous multi-robot system for exploration and strategic water sampling,” in 2018 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2018, pp. 4873–4880.
  25. F. P. Chavez, J. Sevadjian, C. Wahl, J. Friederich, and G. E. Friederich, “Measurements of pco2 and ph from an autonomous surface vehicle in a coastal upwelling system,” Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography, vol. 151, pp. 137–146, 2018.
  26. M. Dunbabin, A. Grinham, and J. Udy, “An autonomous surface vehicle for water quality monitoring,” in Australasian conference on robotics and automation (ACRA).   Citeseer, 2009, pp. 2–4.
  27. A. Valada, P. Velagapudi, B. Kannan, C. Tomaszewski, G. Kantor, and P. Scerri, “Development of a low cost multi-robot autonomous marine surface platform,” in Field and service robotics.   Springer, 2014, pp. 643–658.
  28. E. Desa, P. K. Maurya, A. Pereira, A. M. Pascoal, R. G. Prabhudesai, A. Mascarenhas, E. Desa, R. Madhan, S. G. P. Matondkar, G. Navelkar, S. Prabhudesai, and S. Afzulpurkar, “A small autonomous surface vehicle for ocean color remote sensing,” IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 353–364, 2007.
  29. D. Madeo, A. Pozzebon, C. Mocenni, and D. Bertoni, “A low-cost unmanned surface vehicle for pervasive water quality monitoring,” IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, vol. 69, pp. 1433–1444, 2020.
  30. J. Simmerman, G. D. Chesser, J. W. Lowe, J. Moorhead, W. Beshah, G. Turnage, P. Dash, M. Sankar, R. Moorhead, and J. Herman, “Evaluation of the utility and performance of an autonomous surface vehicle for mobile monitoring of waterborne biochemical agents,” in OCEANS 2021: San Diego – Porto, 2021, pp. 1–10.
  31. A. T. Demetillo and E. B. Taboada, “Real-time water quality monitoring for small aquatic area using unmanned surface vehicle,” Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 3959–3964, 2019.
  32. G. S. Sukhatme, A. Dhariwal, B. Zhang, C. Oberg, B. Stauffer, and D. A. Caron, “Design and development of a wireless robotic networked aquatic microbial observing system,” Environmental Engineering Science, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 205–215, 2007.
  33. J. Manley, “Unmanned surface vehicles, 15 years of development,” OCEANS 2008, vol. 2008-Supplement, pp. 1–4, 2008.
  34. L. Velasco, J. Balbuena, J. Gonzales, and F. Cuellar, “Development of an asv for oceanographic monitoring on the huarmey coast,” in 2021 IEEE 30th International Symposium on Industrial Electronics (ISIE), 2021, pp. 1–7.
  35. H. Ferreira, C. Almeida, A. Martins, J. Almeida, N. Dias, A. Dias, and E. Silva, “Autonomous bathymetry for risk assessment with roaz robotic surface vehicle,” in OCEANS 2009-EUROPE, 2009, pp. 1–6.
  36. J. Wang, W. Gu, and J. Zhu, “Design of an autonomous surface vehicle used for marine environment monitoring,” in 2009 International Conference on Advanced Computer Control, 2009, pp. 405–409.
  37. W.-R. Yang, C.-Y. Chen, C.-M. Hsu, C.-J. Tseng, and W.-C. Yang, “Multifunctional inshore survey platform with unmanned surface vehicles,” International Journal of Automation and Smart Technology, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 19–25, 2011.
  38. C. Li, E. Weeks, W. Huang, B. Milan, and R. Wu, “Weather-induced transport through a tidal channel calibrated by an unmanned boat,” Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 261–279, 2018.
Citations (2)
View on Semantic Scholar

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Summarize Now
X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets