Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
92 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Premium
50 tokens/sec
GPT-5 Medium
22 tokens/sec
GPT-5 High Premium
21 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
97 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Premium
87 tokens/sec
GPT OSS 120B via Groq Premium
459 tokens/sec
Kimi K2 via Groq Premium
230 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Electromagnetically-induced transparency assists the Raman gradient echo memory at moderate detuning, dependent on gradient order (2312.12714v2)

Published 20 Dec 2023 in quant-ph and physics.atom-ph

Abstract: Optical quantum memories are essential for quantum communications and photonic quantum technologies. Ensemble optical memories based on 3-level interactions are a popular basis for implementing these memories. All such memories, however, suffer from loss due to scattering. In off-resonant 3-level interactions, such as the Raman gradient echo memory (GEM), scattering loss can be reduced by a large detuning from the intermediate state. In this work, we show how electromagnetically induced transparency adjacent to the Raman absorption line plays a crucial role in reducing scattering loss, so that maximum efficiency is in fact achieved at a moderate detuning. Furthermore, the effectiveness of the transparency, and therefore the efficiency of GEM, depends on the order in which gradients are applied to store and recall the light. We provide a theoretical analysis and show experimentally how the efficiency depends on gradient order and detuning.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (43)
  1. Demonstration of Atomic Frequency Comb Memory for Light with Spin-Wave Storage. Physical Review Letters, 104(4), Jan. 2010.
  2. Material platforms for spin-based photonic quantum technologies. Nature Reviews. Materials, 3(5):38–51, May 2018. Num Pages: 38-51 Place: London, United States Publisher: Nature Publishing Group.
  3. Quantum technologies with optically interfaced solid-state spins. Nature Photonics, 12(9):516–527, Sept. 2018. Number: 9 Publisher: Nature Publishing Group.
  4. Quantum Repeaters: The Role of Imperfect Local Operations in Quantum Communication. Physical Review Letters, 81(26):5932–5935, Dec. 1998.
  5. Prospective applications of optical quantum memories. Journal of Modern Optics, 60(18):1519–1537, Oct. 2013. Publisher: Taylor & Francis _eprint: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500340.2013.856482.
  6. Configurable Unitary Transformations and Linear Logic Gates Using Quantum Memories. Physical Review Letters, 113(6):063601, Aug. 2014. Publisher: American Physical Society.
  7. Highly efficient optical quantum memory with long coherence time in cold atoms. Optica, 3(1):100, Jan. 2016.
  8. Mapping photonic entanglement into and out of a quantum memory. Nature, 452(7183):67–71, Mar. 2008.
  9. XMDS2: Fast, scalable simulation of coupled stochastic partial differential equations. Computer Physics Communications, 184(1):201–208, Jan. 2013.
  10. Long-distance quantum communication with atomic ensembles and linear optics. Nature, 414(6862):413–418, Nov. 2001.
  11. Optimizing the efficiency of a quantum memory based on rephased amplified spontaneous emission. Physical Review A, 107(3):L030602, Mar. 2023. Publisher: American Physical Society.
  12. Dynamical observations of self-stabilizing stationary light. Nature Physics, 13(1):68–73, Jan. 2017. Number: 1 Publisher: Nature Publishing Group.
  13. Fast, noise-free memory for photon synchronization at room temperature. Science Advances, 4(1):eaap8598, Jan. 2018. Publisher: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
  14. Electromagnetically induced transparency: Optics in coherent media. Reviews of Modern Physics, 77(2):633–673, July 2005.
  15. M. Fleischhauer and M. D. Lukin. Quantum memory for photons: Dark-state polaritons. Physical Review A, 65(2):022314, Jan. 2002.
  16. Electromagnetically induced transparency and four-wave mixing in a cold atomic ensemble with large optical depth. New Journal of Physics, 16(11):113053, Nov. 2014.
  17. Photon storage in raman -type optically dense atomic media. II. Free-space model. Physical Review A, 76(3):033805, Sept. 2007.
  18. Quantum interface between light and atomic ensembles. Reviews of Modern Physics, 82(2):1041–1093, Apr. 2010.
  19. Quantum memories: emerging applications and recent advances. Journal of Modern Optics, 63(20):2005–2028, Nov. 2016.
  20. Dual-rail optical gradient echo memory. Optics Express, 23(19):24937, Sept. 2015.
  21. High efficiency coherent optical memory with warm rubidium vapour. Nature Communications, 2:174, Feb. 2011.
  22. Storage and manipulation of light using a Raman gradient-echo process. Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics, 45(12):124004, June 2012.
  23. Highly Efficient Coherent Optical Memory Based on Electromagnetically Induced Transparency. Physical Review Letters, 120(18):183602, May 2018. Publisher: American Physical Society.
  24. Photon echoes generated by reversing magnetic field gradients in a rubidium vapor. Optics Letters, 33(20):2323, Oct. 2008.
  25. Towards highly multimode optical quantum memory for quantum repeaters. Physical Review A, 93(3):032327, Mar. 2016. Publisher: American Physical Society.
  26. O. Katz and O. Firstenberg. Light storage for one second in room-temperature alkali vapor. Nature Communications, 9(1):2074, May 2018. Number: 1 Publisher: Nature Publishing Group.
  27. Telecom-heralded entanglement between multimode solid-state quantum memories. Nature, 594(7861):37–40, June 2021. Number: 7861 Publisher: Nature Publishing Group.
  28. Raman scheme for adjustable-bandwidth quantum memory. Physical Review A, 80(1), July 2009.
  29. Electromagnetically induced absorption. Physical Review A, 59(6):4732–4735, June 1999.
  30. M. D. Lukin and A. Imamoğlu. Controlling photons using electromagnetically induced transparency. Nature, 413(6853):273–276, Sept. 2001.
  31. Optical quantum memory. Nature Photonics, 3(12):706–714, Dec. 2009. Number: 12 Publisher: Nature Publishing Group.
  32. Optical quantum memory based on electromagnetically induced transparency. Journal of Optics, 19(4):043001, Feb. 2017. Publisher: IOP Publishing.
  33. Efficiency and fidelity of photon-echo quantum memory in an atomic system with longitudinal inhomogeneous broadening. Physical Review A, 78(2), Aug. 2008.
  34. Advances in photonic quantum sensing. Nature Photonics, 12(12):724–733, Dec. 2018. Number: 12 Publisher: Nature Publishing Group.
  35. Towards high-speed optical quantum memories. Nature Photonics, 4(4):218–221, Apr. 2010.
  36. Coherent storage and manipulation of broadband photons via dynamically controlled Autler–Townes splitting. Nature Photonics, 12(12):774–782, Dec. 2018. Number: 12 Publisher: Nature Publishing Group.
  37. Quantum Repeaters with Photon Pair Sources and Multimode Memories. Physical Review Letters, 98(19):190503, May 2007.
  38. Precision Spectral Manipulation: A Demonstration Using a Coherent Optical Memory. Physical Review X, 2(2), June 2012.
  39. High-performance Raman memory with spatio-temporal reversal. Optics Express, 26(10):12424–12431, May 2018. Publisher: Optical Society of America.
  40. W. Wasilewski and M. G. Raymer. Pairwise entanglement and readout of atomic-ensemble and optical wave-packet modes in traveling-wave Raman interactions. Physical Review A, 73(6), June 2006.
  41. Long distance quantum teleportation. Quantum Science and Technology, 3(1):014012, Dec. 2017. Publisher: IOP Publishing.
  42. Advances in device-independent quantum key distribution. npj Quantum Information, 9(1):1–11, Feb. 2023. Number: 1 Publisher: Nature Publishing Group.
  43. Creation of Long-Term Coherent Optical Memory via Controlled Nonlinear Interactions in Bose-Einstein Condensates. Physical Review Letters, 103(23), Dec. 2009.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.