Connectedness in weighted consensus division of graphical cakes between two agents (2312.12260v2)
Abstract: Austin's moving knife procedure was originally introduced to find a consensus division of a cake between two agents: each agent believes that they receive exactly half of the cake. Here, we adapt it to the case when the two agents have arbitrary entitlements of the cake and seek a weighted consensus division -- one where each agent believes that they received exactly the share that they are entitled to -- which also minimizes the number of connected components that each agent receives. First, we find a weighted consensus division of a circular cake, which gives exactly one connected piece to each agent: this gives an explicit protocol for the Stromquist-Woodall theorem for two agents. Next, by judiciously mapping a circle to a graph, we produce a weighted consensus division of a star graph cake that gives at most two connected pieces to each agent -- and show that this bound on the number of connected pieces is tight. For trees, each agent receives at most h+1 connected pieces, where h is the height of the tree, and for general (connected) graphical cakes each agent receives r+2 connected pieces, where r is the radius of the graph.
- ER. Arunachaleswaran, S. Barman, R. Kumar, N. Rathi , “Fair and Efficient Cake Division with Connected Pieces”, International Conference on Web and Internet Economics 2019, in Lecture Notes in Computer Science, volume 11920, Springer.
- A. Austin, “Sharing a Cake.” The Mathematical Gazette 66(437) The Mathematical Association (1982): 212-215.
- S. Barman, P. Kulkarni, “Approximation Algorithms for Envy-Free Cake Division with Connected Pieces”, arXiv:2208.08670 (2022).
- X. Bei, W. Suksompong, “Dividing a Graphical Cake.” Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence 33 (2019).
- S. Man Yuen, W. Suksompong, “Approximate Envy-Freeness in Graphical Cake Cutting”, Proceedings of the Thirty-Second International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 2923-2930 (2023).
- E. Segal-Halevi, “Cake-Cutting with Different Entitlements: How Many Cuts Are Needed?” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 480(1) (2018).
- H. Shishido, DZ. Zeng. “Mark-Choose-Cut Algorithms for Fair and Strongly Fair Division.” Group Decision and Negotiation 8(2) (1999): 125–137.
- W. Stromquist, DR. Woodall, “Sets on which several measures agree.” Journal of Mathematical Analysis 108 (1985): 241–248.