Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
156 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Bisimplicial separators (2312.10830v1)

Published 17 Dec 2023 in math.CO, cs.CC, cs.DM, and cs.DS

Abstract: A minimal separator of a graph $G$ is a set $S \subseteq V(G)$ such that there exist vertices $a,b \in V(G) \setminus S$ with the property that $S$ separates $a$ from $b$ in $G$, but no proper subset of $S$ does. For an integer $k\ge 0$, we say that a minimal separator is $k$-simplicial if it can be covered by $k$ cliques and denote by $\mathcal{G}_k$ the class of all graphs in which each minimal separator is $k$-simplicial. We show that for each $k \geq 0$, the class $\mathcal{G}_k$ is closed under induced minors, and we use this to show that the Maximum Weight Stable Set problem can be solved in polynomial time for $\mathcal{G}_k$. We also give a complete list of minimal forbidden induced minors for $\mathcal{G}_2$. Next, we show that, for $k \geq 1$, every nonnull graph in $\mathcal{G}_k$ has a $k$-simplicial vertex, i.e., a vertex whose neighborhood is a union of $k$ cliques; we deduce that the Maximum Weight Clique problem can be solved in polynomial time for graphs in $\mathcal{G}_2$. Further, we show that, for $k \geq 3$, it is NP-hard to recognize graphs in $\mathcal{G}_k$; the time complexity of recognizing graphs in $\mathcal{G}_2$ is unknown. We also show that the Maximum Clique problem is NP-hard for graphs in $\mathcal{G}_3$. Finally, we prove a decomposition theorem for diamond-free graphs in $\mathcal{G}_2$ (where the diamond is the graph obtained from $K_4$ by deleting one edge), and we use this theorem to obtain polynomial-time algorithms for the Vertex Coloring and recognition problems for diamond-free graphs in $\mathcal{G}_2$, and improved running times for the Maximum Weight Clique and Maximum Weight Stable Set problems for this class of graphs.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (30)
  1. Vertex elimination orderings for hereditary graph classes. Discrete Mathematics, 338(5):825–834, 2015.
  2. J. Alman and V. Vassilevska Williams. A refined laser method and faster matrix multiplication. In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA), pages 522–539. [Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM)], Philadelphia, PA, 2021.
  3. Easy problems for tree-decomposable graphs. J. Algorithms, 12(2):308–340, 1991.
  4. J. Backer. Separator orders in interval, cocomparability, and AT-free graphs. Discrete Applied Mathematics, 159(8):717–726, 2011.
  5. Avoidable vertices and edges in graphs: existence, characterization, and applications. Discrete Appl. Math., 309:285–300, 2022.
  6. A. Berry and J.-P. Bordat. Separability generalizes Dirac’s theorem. Discrete Applied Mathematics, 84(1-3):43–53, 1998.
  7. H. L. Bodlaender. A linear-time algorithm for finding tree-decompositions of small treewidth. SIAM J. Comput., 25(6):1305–1317, 1996.
  8. H. L. Bodlaender and A. M. C. A. Koster. Safe separators for treewidth. Discrete mathematics, 306(3):337–350, 2006.
  9. Clique-cutsets beyond chordal graphs. J. Graph Theory, 91(2):192–246, 2019.
  10. V. Bouchitté and I. Todinca. Treewidth and minimum fill-in: grouping the minimal separators. SIAM Journal on Computing, 31(1):212–232, 2001.
  11. On H𝐻Hitalic_H-topological intersection graphs. Algorithmica, 83(11):3281–3318, 2021.
  12. Maximum flow and minimum-cost flow in almost-linear time. In 2022 IEEE 63rd Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science—FOCS 2022, pages 612–623. IEEE Computer Soc., Los Alamitos, CA, [2022] ©2022.
  13. Universally signable graphs. Combinatorica, 17(1):67–77, 1997.
  14. D. Coudert and G. Ducoffe. Revisiting decomposition by clique separators. SIAM J. Discrete Math., 32(1):682–694, 2018.
  15. Treewidth versus clique number. III. Tree-independence number of graphs with a forbidden structure. arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.15092, 2022.
  16. Treewidth versus clique number. I. Graph classes with a forbidden structure. SIAM J. Discrete Math., 35(4):2618–2646, 2021.
  17. Treewidth versus clique number. II. Tree-independence number. J. Combin. Theory Ser. B, 164:404–442, 2024.
  18. G. A. Dirac. On rigid circuit graphs. Abhandlungen aus dem Mathematischen Seminar der Universität Hamburg, 25:71–76, 1961.
  19. U. Faigle and G. Frahling. A combinatorial algorithm for weighted stable sets in bipartite graphs. Discrete Appl. Math., 154(9):1380–1391, 2006.
  20. A. Frank. Some polynomial algorithms for certain graphs and hypergraphs. In Proceedings of the Fifth British Combinatorial Conference (Univ. Aberdeen, Aberdeen, 1975),, Congressus Numerantium, No. XV,, pages 211–226, 1976.
  21. The complexity of coloring circular arcs and chords. SIAM Journal on Algebraic Discrete Methods, 1(2):216–227, 1980.
  22. T. R. Hartinger and M. Milanič. Partial characterizations of 1-perfectly orientable graphs. J. Graph Theory, 85(2):378–394, 2017.
  23. P. Heggernes. Minimal triangulations of graphs: a survey. Discrete Mathematics, 306(3):297–317, 2006.
  24. Complexity of coloring graphs without forbidden induced subgraphs. In Graph-theoretic concepts in computer science (Boltenhagen, 2001), volume 2204 of Lecture Notes in Comput. Sci., pages 254–262. Springer, Berlin, 2001.
  25. K. Makino and T. Uno. New algorithms for enumerating all maximal cliques. In Algorithm theory—SWAT 2004, volume 3111 of Lecture Notes in Comput. Sci., pages 260–272. Springer, Berlin, 2004.
  26. S. Poljak. A note on stable sets and colorings of graphs. Commentationes Mathematicae Universitatis Carolinae, 15(2):307–309, 1974.
  27. Algorithmic aspects of vertex elimination on graphs. SIAM Journal on computing, 5(2):266–283, 1976.
  28. R. E. Tarjan. Decomposition by clique separators. Discrete mathematics, 55(2):221–232, 1985.
  29. Finding four-node subgraphs in triangle time. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, pages 1671–1680. SIAM, Philadelphia, PA, 2015.
  30. Y. Ye and A. Borodin. Elimination graphs. ACM Transactions on Algorithms, 8(2):Article 14, 1–23, 2012.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.