Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
119 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
56 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

The DSA Transparency Database: Auditing Self-reported Moderation Actions by Social Media (2312.10269v3)

Published 16 Dec 2023 in cs.SI, cs.AI, cs.CY, and cs.HC

Abstract: Since September 2023, the Digital Services Act (DSA) obliges large online platforms to submit detailed data on each moderation action they take within the European Union (EU) to the DSA Transparency Database. From its inception, this centralized database has sparked scholarly interest as an unprecedented and potentially unique trove of data on real-world online moderation. Here, we thoroughly analyze all 353.12M records submitted by the eight largest social media platforms in the EU during the first 100 days of the database. Specifically, we conduct a platform-wise comparative study of their: volume of moderation actions, grounds for decision, types of applied restrictions, types of moderated content, timeliness in undertaking and submitting moderation actions, and use of automation. Furthermore, we systematically cross-check the contents of the database with the platforms' own transparency reports. Our analyses reveal that (i) the platforms adhered only in part to the philosophy and structure of the database, (ii) the structure of the database is partially inadequate for the platforms' reporting needs, (iii) the platforms exhibited substantial differences in their moderation actions, (iv) a remarkable fraction of the database data is inconsistent, (v) the platform X (formerly Twitter) presents the most inconsistencies. Our findings have far-reaching implications for policymakers and scholars across diverse disciplines. They offer guidance for future regulations that cater to the reporting needs of online platforms in general, but also highlight opportunities to improve and refine the database itself.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (28)
  1. A survey on multimodal disinformation detection. In The 29th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING’22), 6625–6643. ACL.
  2. A tale of four platforms: Motivations and uses of Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and Snapchat among college students? Social media+ society, 3(1): 2056305117691544.
  3. How online advertising targets consumers: The uses of categories and algorithmic tools by audience planners. New Media & Society, 14614448221146174.
  4. A new order: The digital services act and consumer protection. European Journal of Risk Regulation, 12(4): 758–774.
  5. The Digital Services Act (DSA): A New Era for Online Harms and Intermediary Liability. Global Privacy Law Review, 4(1).
  6. Regulation on a Single Market For Digital Services (Digital Services Act) and amending Directive. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:32022R2065.
  7. Gazzola, M. 2016. Multilingual communication for whom? Language policy and fairness in the European Union. European Union Politics, 17(4): 546–569.
  8. Gillespie, T. 2018. Custodians of the Internet: Platforms, content moderation, and the hidden decisions that shape social media. Yale University Press.
  9. Gillespie, T. 2020. Content moderation, AI, and the question of scale. Big Data & Society, 7(2).
  10. Grimmelmann, J. 2015. The virtues of moderation. Yale Journal of Law and Technology, 17: 42.
  11. Husovec, M. 2024. Rising Above Liability: The Digital Services Act as a Blueprint for the Second Generation of Global Internet Rules. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 38(3).
  12. Evaluating the effectiveness of deplatforming as a moderation strategy on Twitter. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 5(CSCW2): 1–30.
  13. Reconsidering tweets: Intervening during tweet creation decreases offensive content. In AAAI ICWSM.
  14. Setting the record straighter on shadow banning. In The IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM’21), 1–10.
  15. Leerssen, P. 2023. An End to Shadow Banning? Transparency rights in the Digital Services Act between content moderation and curation. Computer Law & Security Review, 48: 105790.
  16. A new generation of perspective api: Efficient multilingual character-level transformers. In Proceedings of the 28th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 3197–3207.
  17. “I’m not sure what difference is between their content and mine, other than the person itself” A study of fairness perception of content moderation on YouTube. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 6(CSCW2): 1–28.
  18. Myers West, S. 2018. Censored, suspended, shadowbanned: User interpretations of content moderation on social media platforms. New Media & Society, 20(11): 4366–4383.
  19. Nunziato, D. C. 2023. The Digital Services Act and the Brussels Effect on Platform Content Moderation. GWU Legal Studies Research Paper, (2023-28).
  20. A survey on multidimensional scaling. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 51(3): 1–25.
  21. Santa Clara Principles. 2021. The Santa Clara Principles 2.0 on transparency and accountability in content moderation. https://santaclaraprinciples.org/.
  22. The effectiveness of moderating harmful online content. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 120(34): e2307360120.
  23. The Digital Services Act: transparency as an efficient tool to curb the spread of disinformation on online platforms? J. Intell. Prop. Info. Tech. & Elec. Com. L., 14: 66.
  24. Make Reddit Great Again: Assessing community effects of moderation interventions on r/The_Donald. In The 25th ACM Conference On Computer-Supported Cooperative Work And Social Computing (CSCW’22), 1–28. ACM.
  25. The digital services act: an analysis of its ethical, legal, and social implications. Law, Innovation and Technology, 15(1): 83–106.
  26. How transparent are transparency reports? Comparative analysis of transparency reporting across online platforms. Telecommunications Policy, 47(3).
  27. Wilman, F. 2022. The Digital Services Act (DSA)-An Ooverview. Available at SSRN 4304586.
  28. Zannettou, S. 2021. “I Won the Election!”: An empirical analysis of soft moderation interventions on Twitter. In AAAI ICWSM.
User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (3)
  1. Amaury Trujillo (13 papers)
  2. Tiziano Fagni (9 papers)
  3. Stefano Cresci (40 papers)
Citations (7)
View on Semantic Scholar

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Summarize Now