Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
153 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Applying Machine Learning Models on Metrology Data for Predicting Device Electrical Performance (2312.09462v1)

Published 20 Nov 2023 in eess.SP, cs.AI, cs.LG, and physics.app-ph

Abstract: Moore Law states that transistor density will double every two years, which is sustained until today due to continuous multi-directional innovations, such as extreme ultraviolet lithography, novel patterning techniques etc., leading the semiconductor industry towards 3nm node and beyond. For any patterning scheme, the most important metric to evaluate the quality of printed patterns is EPE, with overlay being its largest contribution. Overlay errors can lead to fatal failures of IC devices such as short circuits or broken connections in terms of P2P electrical contacts. Therefore, it is essential to develop effective overlay analysis and control techniques to ensure good functionality of fabricated semiconductor devices. In this work we have used an imec N14 BEOL process flow using LELE patterning technique to print metal layers with minimum pitch of 48nm with 193i lithography. FF structures are decomposed into two mask layers (M1A and M1B) and then the LELE flow is carried out to make the final patterns. Since a single M1 layer is decomposed into two masks, control of overlay between the two masks is critical. The goal of this work is of two-fold as, (a) to quantify the impact of overlay on capacitance and (b) to see if we can predict the final capacitance measurements with selected machine learning models at an early stage. To do so, scatterometry spectra are collected on these electrical test structures at (a)post litho, (b)post TiN hardmask etch, and (c)post Cu plating and CMP. Critical Dimension and overlay measurements for line-space pattern are done with SEM post litho, post etch and post Cu CMP. Various machine learning models are applied to do the capacitance prediction with multiple metrology inputs at different steps of wafer processing. Finally, we demonstrate that by using appropriate machine learning models we are able to do better prediction of electrical results.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (9)
  1. Ndubuisi G Orji “Metrology for the next generation of semiconductor devices” In Nature electronics 1.10 Nature Publishing Group UK London, 2018, pp. 532–547 DOI: 10.1038/s41928-018-0150-9
  2. Alok Vaid “A holistic metrology approach: hybrid metrology utilizing scatterometry, CD-AFM, and CD-SEM” In Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control for Microlithography XXV 7971, 2011, pp. 21–40 SPIE DOI: 10.1117/12.881632
  3. CA Bode “Run-to-run control and performance monitoring of overlay in semiconductor manufacturing” In Control engineering practice 12.7 Elsevier, 2004, pp. 893–900 DOI: 10.1016/S0967-0661(03)00154-0
  4. Narender Rana “Leveraging advanced data analytics, machine learning, and metrology models to enable critical dimension metrology solutions for advanced integrated circuit nodes” In Journal of Micro/Nanolithography, MEMS, and MOEMS 13.4 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers, 2014, pp. 041415–041415 DOI: 10.1117/1.JMM.13.4.041415
  5. Anh Tuan Ngo “Machine Learning Based Edge Placement Error Analysis and Optimization: A Systematic Review” In IEEE Transactions on Semiconductor Manufacturing IEEE, 2022 DOI: 10.1109/TSM.2022.3217326
  6. Mary Breton “Electrical test prediction using hybrid metrology and machine learning” In Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control for Microlithography XXXI 10145, 2017, pp. 16–23 SPIE DOI: 10.1117/12.2261091
  7. Dasari Jie Li Prasad “Diffraction based overlay metrology for double patterning technologies” In Recent Advances in Nanofabrication Techniques and Applications BoD–Books on Demand, 2011, pp. 433
  8. Chandra Saru Saravanan “Evaluating diffraction based overlay metrology for double patterning technologies” In Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control for Microlithography XXII 6922, 2008, pp. 125–136 SPIE DOI: 10.1117/12.774736
  9. F. Pedregosa “Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python” In Journal of Machine Learning Research 12, 2011, pp. 2825–2830

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.