Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
184 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Symmetry Breaking and Equivariant Neural Networks (2312.09016v2)

Published 14 Dec 2023 in cs.LG and stat.ML

Abstract: Using symmetry as an inductive bias in deep learning has been proven to be a principled approach for sample-efficient model design. However, the relationship between symmetry and the imperative for equivariance in neural networks is not always obvious. Here, we analyze a key limitation that arises in equivariant functions: their incapacity to break symmetry at the level of individual data samples. In response, we introduce a novel notion of 'relaxed equivariance' that circumvents this limitation. We further demonstrate how to incorporate this relaxation into equivariant multilayer perceptrons (E-MLPs), offering an alternative to the noise-injection method. The relevance of symmetry breaking is then discussed in various application domains: physics, graph representation learning, combinatorial optimization and equivariant decoding.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (22)
  1. Machine learning for combinatorial optimization: a methodological tour d’horizon. European Journal of Operational Research, 290(2):405–421, 2021.
  2. Geometric deep learning: Grids, groups, graphs, geodesics, and gauges. arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.13478, 2021.
  3. Alan F Chalmers. Curie’s principle. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 21(2):133–148, 1970.
  4. Pierre Curie. Sur la symétrie dans les phénomènes physiques, symétrie d’un champ électrique et d’un champ magnétique. Journal de physique théorique et appliquée, 3(1):393–415, 1894.
  5. A practical method for constructing equivariant multilayer perceptrons for arbitrary matrix groups. In International conference on machine learning, pages 3318–3328. PMLR, 2021.
  6. The symmetry perspective: from equilibrium to chaos in phase space and physical space, volume 200. Springer Science & Business Media, 2002.
  7. The elements of statistical learning: data mining, inference, and prediction, volume 2. Springer, 2009.
  8. Equivariant networks for crystal structures. In Alice H. Oh, Alekh Agarwal, Danielle Belgrave, and Kyunghyun Cho, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2022. URL https://openreview.net/forum?id=0Dh8dz4snu.
  9. Equivariance with learned canonicalization functions. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 15546–15566. PMLR, 2023.
  10. Expressive sign equivariant networks for spectral geometric learning. In ICLR 2023 Workshop on Physics for Machine Learning, 2023.
  11. Graph normalizing flows. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 32, 2019.
  12. Object-centric learning with slot attention. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33:11525–11538, 2020.
  13. Rectified linear units improve restricted boltzmann machines. In Proceedings of the 27th international conference on machine learning (ICML-10), pages 807–814, 2010.
  14. Charles C Pinter. A book of abstract algebra. Courier Corporation, 2010.
  15. Equivariance through parameter-sharing. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 2892–2901. PMLR, 2017.
  16. E (n) equivariant graph neural networks. In International conference on machine learning, pages 9323–9332. PMLR, 2021.
  17. Your dataset is a multiset and you should compress it like one. In NeurIPS 2021 Workshop on Deep Generative Models and Downstream Applications, 2021.
  18. J. Shawe-Taylor. Building symmetries into feedforward networks. In 1989 First IEE International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks, (Conf. Publ. No. 313), pages 158–162, 1989.
  19. Finding symmetry breaking order parameters with euclidean neural networks. Phys. Rev. Research, 3:L012002, Jan 2021. 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.L012002. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.L012002.
  20. Top-n: Equivariant set and graph generation without exchangeability. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2022. URL https://openreview.net/forum?id=-Gk_IPJWvk.
  21. Hermann Weyl. Symmetry. In Symmetry. Princeton University Press, 1952.
  22. Multiset-equivariant set prediction with approximate implicit differentiation. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2022. URL https://openreview.net/forum?id=5K7RRqZEjoS.
Citations (6)

Summary

  • The paper introduces relaxed equivariance to enable neural networks to break symmetry constraints without relying on noise injection.
  • It establishes a mathematical framework by integrating relaxed equivariance into Equivariant Multilayer Perceptrons with linear weight constraints.
  • The findings offer practical insights for modeling phase transitions, graph clustering, and symmetry-rich data in fields like physics and computer vision.

Analyzing Symmetry Breaking in Equivariant Neural Networks

The insightful examination presented in the paper "Symmetry Breaking and Equivariant Neural Networks" by Kaba and Ravanbakhsh focuses on the application and limits of symmetry within the field of neural networks, particularly those employing equivariant functions. The authors progress beyond the standard utilizations of symmetry as an inductive bias, addressing the inherent limitation where equivariant functions fail to differentiate or 'break' symmetry at the level of individual data samples.

Key Contributions

The paper introduces the concept of 'relaxed equivariance' as a means to navigate the constraints posed by strict equivariance, thereby enabling the modeling of phenomena such as symmetry breaking. This concept addresses the issue of handling symmetry in data while allowing the neural network the ability to differentiate among symmetric samples. The authors propose an alternative mechanistic approach to the widely used noise-injection method, which often serves as a developmental crutch for enabling symmetry breaking.

Through this work, the authors build upon the theoretical underpinnings of symmetry in physical phenomena and extend its findings to multiple applications within diverse domains such as graph representation learning, combinatorial optimization, and physics. They clearly delineate how symmetry, or the inability to dodge it due to strict equivariance, may hinder optimal performance in tasks such as phase transition modeling, graph-based clustering, and decoding from invariant spaces.

Theoretical Foundations and Methods

The foundation of this paper is rooted in the mathematical formalisms surrounding symmetry, group actions, and equivariant functions. The authors clearly exploit the inherently geometric properties and theoretical constraints linked with equivariant transformations. Relaxed equivariance unfolds as a natural extension by permitting the function's output to have potentially different stabilizer subgroups from the input, thus allowing the neural network to paint a richer and more diverse landscape of predictive outcomes.

Moreover, the authors derive a mathematical framework through which relaxed equivariance can be integrated into Equivariant Multilayer Perceptrons (E-MLPs). This involves imposing specific linear constraints on weight matrices within neural layers that honor relaxed equivariance while being computationally feasible.

Implications and Future Directions

This work bears significant implications for researchers and practitioners focused on neural architectures that must contend with symmetries. The potential to break symmetry without reverting to naive methods like noise injection can lead to more elegant and computationally efficient algorithms across machine learning applications.

The idea of relaxed equivariance opens avenues for designing architectures in contexts where the input data exhibits symmetry—common in fields relying heavily on the translation, rotation, or other symmetries, such as physics simulation and computer vision. The methodological approach advocated by the authors can also enrich the capabilities of generative models in handling non-trivially symmetric spaces.

Future explorations could focus on further empirically validating the proposed architecture changes across varied datasets and domains, assessing potential performance improvements. Additionally, the computational constraints of realizing such architectures, especially as they scale across larger and more complex groups, merit further scrutiny and optimization. Exploration of probabilistic approaches to symmetry breaking in learning models, as hinted in the paper, also offers promise. Overall, this work is positioned to contribute substantially to discussions around symmetry in machine learning, calling attention to the subtle yet pivotal impacts of architecture choices on neural network outcomes.