Computing approximate symmetries of complex networks (2312.08042v1)
Abstract: The symmetry of complex networks is a global property that has recently gained attention since MacArthur et al. 2008 showed that many real-world networks contain a considerable number of symmetries. These authors work with a very strict symmetry definition based on the network's automorphism. The potential problem with this approach is that even a slight change in the graph's structure can remove or create some symmetry. Recently, Liu 2020 proposed to use an approximate automorphism instead of strict automorphism. This method can discover symmetries in the network while accepting some minor imperfections in their structure. The proposed numerical method, however, exhibits some performance problems and has some limitations while it assumes the absence of fixed points. In this work, we exploit alternative approaches recently developed for treating the Graph Matching Problem and propose a method, which we will refer to as Quadratic Symmetry Approximator (QSA), to address the aforementioned shortcomings. To test our method, we propose a set of random graph models suitable for assessing a wide family of approximate symmetry algorithms. The performance of our method is also demonstrated on brain networks.
- A. Barabási. Network Science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge CB2 SBS, UK, 1st edition, 2016.
- A.-L. Barabási and R. Albert. Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science, 286(5439):509–512, 1999.
- Complex networks: Structure and dynamics. Physics Reports, 424(4):175–308, 2006.
- E. T. Bullmore and O. Sporns. Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems. Nature reviews neuroscience, 10(3):186–198, 2009.
- Thirty years of graph matching in pattern recognition. International journal of pattern recognition and artificial intelligence, 18(3):265–298, 2004.
- Symmetries and cluster synchronization in multilayer networks. Nature communications, 11(1):3179, 2020.
- P. Erdős and A. Rényi. On random graphs i. Publicationes Mathematicae Debrecen, 6(3-4):290–297, 1959.
- P. Erdős and A. Rényi. Asymmetric graphs. Acta Mathematica Academiae Scientiarum Hungarica, 14:295–315, 1963.
- On betweenness-uniform graphs. Czechoslovak mathematical journal, 63:629–642, 2013.
- On the structure and values of betweenness centrality in dense betweenness-uniform graphs. In European Conference on Combinatorics, Graph Theory and Applications, number 12, 2023.
- C. Godsil and G. F. Royle. Algebraic graph theory, volume 207. Springer Science & Business Media, New York, US, 2001.
- Brain lateralization: A comparative perspective. Physiological Reviews, 100(3):1019–1063, 2020.
- G. Hahn and G. Sabidussi. Graph symmetry: algebraic methods and applications, volume 497. Springer Science & Business Media, Dordrecht, Netherlands, 1 edition, 2013.
- On the connectivity and the diameter of betweenness-uniform graphs. Discrete Applied Mathematics, 342:27–37, 2024.
- Small-world bias of correlation networks: From brain to climate. Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science, 27(3):035812, 03 2017.
- Small-world topology of functional connectivity in randomly connected dynamical systems. Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science, 22(3):033107, 07 2012.
- Stochastic blockmodels: First steps. Social networks, 5(2):109–137, 1983.
- Brain Functional Connectivity Asymmetry: Left Hemisphere Is More Modular. Symmetry, 14(4):1–11, 2022.
- T. C. Koopmans and M. Beckmann. Assignment problems and the location of economic activities. Econometrica: journal of the Econometric Society, 25(1):53–76, 1957.
- Y. Liu. Approximate network symmetry. arXiv preprint arXiv:2012.05129, 2020.
- L. Livi and A. Rizzi. The graph matching problem. Pattern Analysis and Applications, 16(3):253–283, 2013.
- Symmetry in complex networks. Discret. Appl. Math., 156(18):3525–3531, 2007.
- M. Rubinov and O. Sporns. Complex network measures of brain connectivity: Uses and interpretations. Neuroimage, 52(3):1059–1069, SEP 2010.
- R. J. Sánchez-García. Exploiting symmetry in network analysis. Communications Physics, 3(1):87, 2020.
- Automated anatomical labeling of activations in spm using a macroscopic anatomical parcellation of the mni mri single-subject brain. NeuroImage, 15(1):273–289, 2002.
- Network hubs in the human brain. Trends In Cognitive Sciences, 17(12):683–696, 2013.
- Fast approximate quadratic programming for graph matching. PLOS one, 10(4):e0121002, 2015.
- D. Watts and S. Strogatz. Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature, 393(6684):440–442, 1998.
- Emergence of symmetry in complex networks. Physical Review E, 77(6):066108, 2008.
- Quantitative mapping of the brain’s structural connectivity using diffusion MRI tractography: a review. arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.11644, 2021.
- Human brain structural connectivity matrices–ready for modelling. Scientific Data, 9(1):486, 2022.