Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
101 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
13 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
37 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
4 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
33 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

On the Use of Smart Hybrid Contracts to Provide Flexibility in Algorithmic Governance (2312.07565v1)

Published 10 Dec 2023 in cs.CY

Abstract: The use of computer technology to automate the enforcement of law is a promising alternative to simplify bureaucratic procedures. However, careless automation might result in an inflexible and dehumanise law enforcement system driven by algorithms that do not account for the particularities of individuals or minorities. In this paper, we argue that hybrid smart contracts deployed to monitor rather than to blindly enforce regulations can be used to add flexibility. Enforcement is a suitable alternative only when prevention is strictly necessary; however, we argue that in many situations a corrective approach based on monitoring is more flexible and suitable. To add more flexibility, the hybrid smart contract can be programmed to stop to request the intervention of a human or of a group of them when human judgement is needed.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (31)
  1. Filling gaps in incomplete contracts: An economic theory of default rules. The Yale Law Journal, 99(87).
  2. Choi, C. Q. (2021). 7 revealing ways ais fail: Neural networks can be disastrously brittle, forgetful, and surprisingly bad at math. IEEE Spectrum, 58(10).
  3. Smart contracts vulnerabilities: A call for blockchain software engineering? In Proc. Int’l Workshop on Blockchain Oriented Software Engineering (IWBOSE).
  4. Emerson, P. (2018). From Majority Rule to Inclusive Politics. Springer.
  5. Ethereum Foundation (2018). Ethreum: Blockchain app platform. https://www.ethereum.org.
  6. Software engineering for blockchain based software systems: Foundations, survey, and future directions. arXiv:2105.01881 [cs.SE].
  7. Felizia, S. M. (2023). Implementation of automatic preventive law under algorithmic governance. PhD thesis, Faculty of Law, National University of Rosario.
  8. Fortalecimiento del derecho a la confidencialidad en la gobernanza algorítmica. In Jornadas de Ciencia e Ingenieria de Servicios (JCIS).
  9. Isla: Ingeniería de software para leyes automáticas. In Jornadas de Ciencia e Ingenieria de Servicios (JCIS).
  10. Blockchain and the Law: The Rule of Code. Hardvard University Press.
  11. Algorithmic governance and governance of algorithms: An introduction. In Ebers, M. and Gamito, M. C., editors, Algorithmic Governance and Governance of Algorithms Legal and Ethical Challenges. Data Science, Machine Intelligence, and Law Volume 1, pages 2–18. Springer.
  12. Futures of digital governance. Communications of the ACM, 65(3).
  13. Genesereth, M. (2021). What is computational law? https://law.stanford.edu/2021/03/10/what-is-computational-law/. Stanford University.
  14. Grigg, I. (2015). On the intersection of ricardian and smart contracts. https://iang.org/papers/intersection_ricardian_smart.html. visited on 24 Dec 2020.
  15. Grimmelmann, J. (2022). Programming languages and law. In Proc. Symposium on Computer Science and Law (CSLAW’22).
  16. Hadfield, G. K. (1994). Judicial competence and the interpretation of incomplete contracts. The Journal of Legal Studies, 23(1).
  17. The expansion of algorithmic governance: From code is law to law is code. The journal of field actions, (17).
  18. Wise contracts: Smart contracts that work for people and machines. In Proc. 20th Int’l Legal Informatics Symposium (IRIS’17).
  19. Lacock, D. D. (1964). The relevance of logic to law. Modern Uses of Logic in Law, 5(2).
  20. Law, C. (2005). Nathaniel love and michael genesereth. In Proc. 10th Int’l Conf. on Artificial Intelligence and Law.
  21. Law Commission (2020). Smart contracts call for evidence. https://s3-eu-west-2.amazonaws.com/lawcom-prod-storage-11jsxou24uy7q/uploads/2020/12/201216-Smart-contracts-call-for-evidence.pdf. Visited on 19 Dec 2020.
  22. Law Commission (2021). Smart legal contracts advice to government. https://s3-eu-west-2.amazonaws.com/lawcom-prod-storage-11jsxou24uy7q/uploads/2021/11/Smart-legal-contracts-accessible.pdf. Visited on 28 Jun 2022.
  23. Law.MIT.edu (2021). Computational law. https://law.mit.edu. Visited on 5 Jul 2021.
  24. Regulatory technology: Replacing law with computer code. European Business Organization Law Review, 21:349–377.
  25. Molina-Jimenez, C. (2023). Ley Algomata. https://github.com/carlos-molina/LeyAlgomata. Visited on 1 Apr 2023.
  26. Addressing bias in big data and ai for health care: A call for open science. Patterns, 2(10).
  27. Blockchain-oriented software engineering: Challenges and new directions. In Proc. 39th Int’l Conf. on Software Engineering Companion, pages 169–171.
  28. Rodrigues, U. (2018). Law and the blockchain. Iowa Law Review, 104(679).
  29. Sklaroff, J. M. (2018). Smart contracts and the cost of inflflexibility. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 166(263).
  30. Surden, H. (2012). Computable contracts. UC Davis Law Review, 46(629).
  31. Werbach, K. (2020). The siren song: Algorithmic governance by blockchain. In Werbach, K., editor, After the Digital Tornado: networks, algorithms, humanity, chapter 9, pages 215–239. Cambridge University Press.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.