Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
162 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Seller-side Outcome Fairness in Online Marketplaces (2312.03253v1)

Published 6 Dec 2023 in cs.LG and math.OC

Abstract: This paper aims to investigate and achieve seller-side fairness within online marketplaces, where many sellers and their items are not sufficiently exposed to customers in an e-commerce platform. This phenomenon raises concerns regarding the potential loss of revenue associated with less exposed items as well as less marketplace diversity. We introduce the notion of seller-side outcome fairness and build an optimization model to balance collected recommendation rewards and the fairness metric. We then propose a gradient-based data-driven algorithm based on the duality and bandit theory. Our numerical experiments on real e-commerce data sets show that our algorithm can lift seller fairness measures while not hurting metrics like collected Gross Merchandise Value (GMV) and total purchases.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (30)
  1. Fighting fire with fire: Using antidote data to improve polarization and fairness of recommender systems. In Proceedings of the twelfth ACM international conference on web search and data mining, pages 231–239, 2019.
  2. How algorithmic confounding in recommendation systems increases homogeneity and decreases utility. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM conference on recommender systems, pages 224–232, 2018.
  3. Managing popularity bias in recommender systems with personalized re-ranking. arXiv preprint arXiv:1901.07555, 2019.
  4. User-oriented fairness in recommendation. In Proceedings of the Web Conference 2021, pages 624–632, 2021.
  5. Fairness in rankings and recommendations: an overview. The VLDB Journal, pages 1–28, 2022.
  6. Cold start to improve market thickness on online advertising platforms: Data-driven algorithms and field experiments. Management Science, 69(7):3838–3860, 2023.
  7. Online stochastic packing applied to display ad allocation. In Algorithms–ESA 2010: 18th Annual European Symposium, Liverpool, UK, September 6-8, 2010. Proceedings, Part I 18, pages 182–194. Springer, 2010.
  8. The best of many worlds: Dual mirror descent for online allocation problems. Operations Research, 71(1):101–119, 2023.
  9. Bypassing the monster: A faster and simpler optimal algorithm for contextual bandits under realizability. Mathematics of Operations Research, 47(3):1904–1931, 2022.
  10. Repeated auctions with budgets in ad exchanges: Approximations and design. Management Science, 61(4):864–884, 2015.
  11. Adwords and generalized online matching. Journal of the ACM (JACM), 54(5):22–es, 2007.
  12. The adwords problem: online keyword matching with budgeted bidders under random permutations. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM conference on Electronic commerce, pages 71–78, 2009.
  13. Contextual bandits with linear payoff functions. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, pages 208–214. JMLR Workshop and Conference Proceedings, 2011.
  14. Thompson sampling for contextual bandits with linear payoffs. In International conference on machine learning, pages 127–135. PMLR, 2013.
  15. Fairness-aware classifier with prejudice remover regularizer. In Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases: European Conference, ECML PKDD 2012, Bristol, UK, September 24-28, 2012. Proceedings, Part II 23, pages 35–50. Springer, 2012.
  16. Beyond parity: Fairness objectives for collaborative filtering. Advances in neural information processing systems, 30, 2017.
  17. A fairness-aware hybrid recommender system. arXiv preprint arXiv:1809.09030, 2018.
  18. Equality of opportunity in supervised learning. Advances in neural information processing systems, 29, 2016.
  19. Data decisions and theoretical implications when adversarially learning fair representations. arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.00075, 2017.
  20. Fa* ir: A fair top-k ranking algorithm. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pages 1569–1578, 2017.
  21. Controlling popularity bias in learning-to-rank recommendation. In Proceedings of the eleventh ACM conference on recommender systems, pages 42–46, 2017.
  22. Equity of attention: Amortizing individual fairness in rankings. In The 41st international acm sigir conference on research & development in information retrieval, pages 405–414, 2018.
  23. Controlling fairness and bias in dynamic learning-to-rank. In Proceedings of the 43rd international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval, pages 429–438, 2020.
  24. The price of fairness. Operations research, 59(1):17–31, 2011.
  25. On the efficiency-fairness trade-off. Management Science, 58(12):2234–2250, 2012.
  26. Elad Hazan et al. Introduction to online convex optimization. Foundations and Trends® in Optimization, 2(3-4):157–325, 2016.
  27. Regularized online allocation problems: Fairness and beyond. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 630–639. PMLR, 2021.
  28. An empirical evaluation of thompson sampling. Advances in neural information processing systems, 24, 2011.
  29. Micheal Kechinov. ecommerce events history in electronics store. https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/mkechinov/ecommerce-events-history-in-electronics-store.
  30. Unbiased offline evaluation of contextual-bandit-based news article recommendation algorithms. In Proceedings of the fourth ACM international conference on Web search and data mining, pages 297–306, 2011.
Citations (1)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.