Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
173 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
46 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Joint Communication and Sensing in OTFS-based UAV Networks (2311.17742v2)

Published 29 Nov 2023 in cs.IT, eess.SP, and math.IT

Abstract: We consider the problem of accurately localizing $N$ unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) in 3D space where the UAVs are part of a swarm and communicate with each other through orthogonal time-frequency space (OTFS) modulated signals. The OTFS communication system operates in the delay-Doppler domain and can simultaneously provide range and velocity information about the scatterers in the channels at no additional cost. Each receiving UAV estimates the multipath wireless channel on each link formed by the line-of-sight (LoS) transmission and by the single reflections from the remaining $N-2$ UAVs. The estimated channel delay profiles are communicated to an edge server to estimate the location and velocity of the UAVs from the relative echo delay (RED) measurements between the LoS and the non-LoS paths. To accurately obtain such estimations, we propose a solution called Turbo Iterative Positioning (TIP), initialized by a belief-propagation approach. Enabling a full cold start (no prior knowledge of initial positions), the belief propagation first provides a map associating each echo to a reflecting UAV. The localization of the $N$ UAVs is then derived by iteratively alternating a gradient descent optimization and a refinement of the association maps between UAVs and echos. Given that the OTFS receivers also acquire the Doppler shifts of each path, the UAV's velocities can be sensed jointly with communication. Our numerical results, obtained also using real-world traces, show how the multipath links are beneficial to achieving very accurate position and velocity for all UAVs, even with a limited delay-Doppler resolution. The robustness of our scheme is proven by its performance approaching the Cramer-Rao bound.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (14)
  1. A. Nordio, C. F. Chiasserini, and E. Viterbo, “Robust Localization of UAVs in OTFS-Based Networks,” in 2023 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM), 12 2023, accepted for presentation.
  2. K. Witrisal, P. Meissner, E. Leitinger, Y. Shen, C. Gustafson, F. Tufvesson, K. Haneda, D. Dardari, A. F. Molisch, A. Conti, and M. Z. Win, “High-accuracy localization for assisted living: 5G systems will turn multipath channels from foe to friend,” IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 59–70, 2016.
  3. A. R. Ansari, N. Saeed, M. I. Ul Haq, and S. Cho, “Accurate 3D localization method for public safety applications in vehicular ad-hoc networks,” IEEE Access, vol. 6, pp. 20 756–20 763, 2018.
  4. S. M. Asaad and H. S. Maghdid, “A comprehensive review of indoor/outdoor localization solutions in IoT era: Research challenges and future perspectives,” Computer Networks, vol. 212, p. 109041, 2022.
  5. L. Han, R. Liu, X. Lv, Z. Wang, and Q. Zhu, “Optimal waveform design for integrated localization and communication in OFDM systems,” in 2022 IEEE 8th International Conference on Computer and Communications (ICCC), 2022, pp. 868–874.
  6. J. Bai, G. Wei, S. Wang, X. Wang, and Z. Fei, “Efficient direct localization of OFDM emitters in multipath environment with mobile receivers,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 71, no. 1, pp. 545–556, 2022.
  7. M. J. Emadi, S. Hu, and H. Wang, “Precise positioning: When OTFS meets distributed cooperative positioning,” Feb. 2023. [Online]. Available: 10.36227/techrxiv.21951014.v1
  8. F. Linsalata, A. Albanese, V. Sciancalepore, F. Roveda, M. Magarini, and X. Costa-Perez, “OTFS-superimposed PRACH-aided localization for UAV safety applications,” in 2021 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM), 2021, pp. 1–6.
  9. L. Wielandner, E. Leitinger, F. Meyer, and K. Witrisal, “Message passing-based 9-D cooperative localization and navigation with embedded particle flow,” IEEE Transactions on Signal and Information Processing over Networks, vol. 9, pp. 95–109, 2023.
  10. E. Leitinger, F. Meyer, F. Hlawatsch, K. Witrisal, F. Tufvesson, and M. Z. Win, “A belief propagation algorithm for multipath-based SLAM,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 18, no. 12, pp. 5613–5629, 2019.
  11. P. Raviteja, K. T. Phan, and Y. Hong, “Embedded Pilot-Aided Channel Estimation for OTFS in Delay–Doppler Channels,” IEEE Trans. Veh. Tech., vol. 68, no. 5, pp. 4906–4917, 2019.
  12. J. Barzilai and J. M. Borwein, “Two-Point Step Size Gradient Methods,” IMA Journal of Numerical Analysis, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 141–148, 01 1988. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1093/imanum/8.1.141
  13. “Drone tracking dataset,” https://github.com/CenekAlbl/drone-tracking-datasets.
  14. M. G. V. Bogle, J. E. Hearst, V. F. R. Jones, and L. Stoilov, “Lissajous knots,” Journal of Knot Theory and Its Ramifications, vol. 03, no. 02, pp. 121–140, 1994.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.