Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
169 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Perfect Simulation of Las Vegas Algorithms via Local Computation (2311.11679v2)

Published 20 Nov 2023 in cs.DS

Abstract: The notion of Las Vegas algorithms was introduced by Babai (1979) and can be defined in two ways: * In Babai's original definition, a randomized algorithm is called Las Vegas if it has a finitely bounded running time and certifiable random failure. * Another definition widely accepted today is that Las Vegas algorithms refer to zero-error randomized algorithms with random running times. The equivalence between the two definitions is straightforward. Specifically, for randomized algorithms with certifiable failures, repeatedly running the algorithm until no failure is encountered allows for faithful simulation of the correct output when it executes successfully. We show that a similar perfect simulation can also be achieved in distributed local computation. Specifically, in the LOCAL model, with polylogarithmic overhead in time complexity, any Las Vegas algorithm with finitely bounded running time and locally certifiable failures can be converted to a zero-error Las Vegas algorithm. This transformed algorithm faithfully reproduces the correct output of the original algorithm in successful executions.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (32)
  1. Perfect sampling in infinite spin systems via strong spatial mixing. SIAM Journal on Computing, 51(4):1280–1295, 2022.
  2. László Babai. Monte-carlo algorithms in graph isomorphism testing. Université tde Montréal Technical Report, DMS, (79-10), 1979.
  3. Approximation via correlation decay when strong spatial mixing fails. SIAM Journal on Computing, 48(2):279–349, 2019.
  4. Kenneth L Clarkson. Las vegas algorithms for linear and integer programming when the dimension is small. Journal of the ACM (JACM), 42(2):488–499, 1995.
  5. Problems and results on 3-chromatic hypergraphs and some related questions. Infinite and finite sets, 10(2):609–627, 1975.
  6. Towards derandomising markov chain monte carlo. In IEEE 2023 Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS), 2023.
  7. Perfect sampling from spatial mixing. Random Structures & Algorithms, 61(4):678–709, 2022.
  8. Fast sampling and counting k-sat solutions in the local lemma regime. Journal of the ACM (JACM), 68(6):1–42, 2021.
  9. Dynamic sampling from graphical models. SIAM Journal on Computing, 50(2):350–381, 2021.
  10. On local distributed sampling and counting. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing (PODC), pages 189–198, 2018.
  11. Improved distributed network decomposition, hitting sets, and spanners, via derandomization. In Proceedings of the 2023 Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA), pages 2532–2566. SIAM, 2023.
  12. On derandomizing local distributed algorithms. In 2018 IEEE 59th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS), pages 662–673. IEEE, 2018.
  13. Uniform sampling through the Lovász local lemma. Journal of the ACM (JACM), 66(3):18:1–18:31, 2019.
  14. On the complexity of local distributed graph problems. In Proceedings of the 49th Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC), pages 784–797. ACM, 2017.
  15. David G Harris. New bounds for the moser-tardos distribution. Random Structures & Algorithms, 57(1):97–131, 2020.
  16. New constructive aspects of the Lovász local lemma. Journal of the ACM (JACM), 58(6):28, 2011.
  17. Perfect sampling for (atomic) lov\\\backslash\’asz local lemma. arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.03932, 2021.
  18. Sampling lovász local lemma for general constraint satisfaction solutions in near-linear time. In 2022 IEEE 63rd Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS), pages 147–158. IEEE, 2022.
  19. Towards the sampling lovász local lemma. In 2021 IEEE 62nd Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS), pages 173–183. IEEE, 2021.
  20. Random generation of combinatorial structures from a uniform distribution. Theoret. Comput. Sci., 43:169–188, 1986.
  21. Gil Kalai. A subexponential randomized simplex algorithm. In Proceedings of the twenty-fourth annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC), pages 475–482, 1992.
  22. Nathan Linial. Locality in distributed graph algorithms. SIAM Journal on Computing (SICOMP), 21(1):193–201, 1992.
  23. Low diameter graph decompositions. Combinatorica, 13(4):441–454, 1993.
  24. Optimal speedup of las vegas algorithms. Information Processing Letters, 47(4):173–180, 1993.
  25. Ankur Moitra. Approximate counting, the lovász local lemma, and inference in graphical models. Journal of the ACM (JACM), 66(2):1–25, 2019.
  26. Randomized algorithms. Cambridge university press, 1995.
  27. A new method for solving hard satisfiability problems. In Proceedings of the tenth national conference on artificial intelligence (AAAI-92), pages 440–446, 1992.
  28. A constructive proof of the general Lovász local lemma. Journal of the ACM (JACM), 57(2):11, 2010.
  29. Probability and Computing: Randomized Algorithms and Probabilistic Analysis. Cambridge University Press, 2005.
  30. What can be computed locally? SIAM Journal on Computing (SICOMP), 24(6):1259–1277, 1995.
  31. David Peleg. Distributed computing: a locality-sensitive approach. SIAM, 2000.
  32. James G. Propp and David B. Wilson. Exact sampling with coupled Markov chains and applications to statistical mechanics. Random Structures Algorithms, 9(1-2):223–252, 1996.
Citations (1)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com