Thermally-Resilient Soft Gripper for On-Orbit Operations (2311.08942v2)
Abstract: Research in soft manipulators has significantly enhanced object grasping capabilities, thanks to their adaptability to various shapes and sizes. Applying this technology to on-orbit servicing, especially during the capture and containment stages of active space debris removal missions, might offer a secure, adaptable, and cost-effective solution compared to the trend of increasing the degrees of freedom and complexity of the manipulator (e.g. ClearSpace, Astroscale). This work aims to conduct an experimental proof of concept, for which challenges such as radiation, vacuum, and microgravity are significant, but the predominant issue is ensuring effective operation in the extreme temperature swings, where flexible materials may exhibit cryogenic crystallization or drastic shifts in their elasticity. This work addresses this challenge through an initial stage of analytical modeling of the thermal dynamics inside the manipulator in orbit; which is then used for the development of a first experimental prototype tested with liquid nitrogen and heat guns. The multi-layered design for Low Earth Orbit (LEO) leverages the properties of TPU at low infill rates for lightweight inherent flexibility, silicone rubber ensuring structural integrity, PTFE (Teflon) for unparalleled thermal stability, and aerogel for insulation. The tendon-actuated servo-driven gripper is tested in the laboratory by varying the shape and size of objects during the grasping. The results, based on servomotor force metrics to assess the flexible manipulator's adaptability and object capture efficiency across temperature changes, affirm the concept's viability. Forces increase up to 220$\%$ in cryogenic conditions and decrease by no more than 50$\%$ at high temperatures.
- Z. Deng, H. Gao, K. Nagatani, and K. Yoshida, “Planetary rovers’ wheel-soil interaction mechanics: New challenges and applications for wheeled mobile robots,” Intelligent Service Robotics, vol. 4, pp. 17–38, 01 2011.
- D. Rus and M. T. Tolley, “Design, fabrication and control of soft robots,” Nature, vol. 521, pp. 467–475, 2015.
- B. Hoang, S. White, B. Spence, and S. Kiefer, “Commercialization of deployable space systems’ roll-out solar array (rosa) technology for space systems loral (ssl) solar arrays,” in 2016 IEEE Aerospace Conference, 2016, pp. 1–12.
- V. Netti, “Dmf: Deployable modular frame for inflatable space habitats,” in Computer Science, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:210976496
- E. W. Hawkes, L. H. Blumenschein, J. D. Greer, and A. M. Okamura, “A soft robot that navigates its environment through growth,” Science Robotics, vol. 2, no. 8, p. eaan3028, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://www.science.org/doi/abs/10.1126/scirobotics.aan3028
- Y. Zhang, P. Li, J. Quan, L. Li, G. Zhang, and D. Zhou, “Progress, challenges, and prospects of soft robotics for space applications,” Advanced Intelligent Systems, vol. 5, no. 3, p. 2200071, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/aisy.202200071
- J. Karras, C. Fuller, K. Carpenter, A. Buscicchio, D. McKeeby, C. Norman, C. Parcheta, I. Davydychev, and R. Fearing, “Pop-up mars rover with textile-enhanced rigid-flex pcb body,” 05 2017, pp. 5459–5466.
- Y. Liu, K. Luo, S. Wang, X. Song, Z. Zhang, Q. Tian, and H. Hu, “A soft and bistable gripper with adjustable energy barrier for fast capture in space,” Soft Robotics, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 77–87, 2023.
- E. Stoll, C. Trentlage, and M. Becker, “The use of biologically inspired gecko material for active debris removal of high priority objects,” 09 2015.
- E. S. Clark, “Molecular motion in polytetrafluoroethylene at cryogenic temperatures,” Journal of Macromolecular Science, Part B, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 795–800, 1967. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1080/00222346708212363
- G. Theiler, W. Hübner, T. Gradt, P. Klein, and K. Friedrich, “Friction and wear of ptfe composites at cryogenic temperatures11extended version of the paper presented at the 2nd world tribology congress, vienna, 3–7 september 2001.” Tribology International, vol. 35, no. 7, pp. 449–458, 2002. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301679X0200035X
- R. Han, Y. Li, Q. Zhu, and K. Niu, “Research on the preparation and thermal stability of silicone rubber composites: A review,” Composites Part C: Open Access, vol. 8, p. 100249, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666682022000184
- S. Wang, M. Hou, K. Ma, Z. Li, H. Geng, W. Zhang, and N. Li, “Research on the influence of extremely cold environment on the performance of silicone rubber and fluorinated silicone rubber,” Polymers (Basel), vol. 14, no. 9, p. 1898, May 2022.
- F. Martínez, M. Canales, N. Alcalá, M. Jiménez, M. Yahiaoui, A. Ural, J.-Y. Paris, K. Delbé, and J. Denape, “Analysis of wear mechanism in tpu-steel contact pair by means of long stroke tribometer tests,” 06 2012.
- D. S. Kang and S. Yu, “Design-technology co-optimization for cryogenic tensor processing unit,” in 2022 IEEE Asia Pacific Conference on Circuits and Systems (APCCAS), 2022, pp. 1–4.
- J. Kim, J. Ahn, J. Kim, D. Lee, S. Kim, and J. Lee, “Influence of silica-aerogel on mechanical characteristics of polyurethane-based composites: Thermal conductivity and strength,” Materials (Basel), vol. 14, no. 7, p. 1790, Apr 2021.
- C. Dunckle, M. Aggleton, J. Glassman, and P. Taborek, “Friction of molybdenum disulfide–titanium films under cryogenic vacuum conditions,” Tribology International, vol. 44, no. 12, pp. 1819–1826, 2011. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301679X11002179
- A. Ellery, “Tutorial review on space manipulators for space debris mitigation,” Robotics, vol. 8, no. 2, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/2218-6581/8/2/34
- R. Biesbroek, S. Aziz, A. Wolahan, S.-f. Cipolla, M. Richard-Noca, and L. Piguet, “The clearspace-1 mission: Esa and clearspace team up to remove debris,” in Proc. 8th Eur. Conf. Sp. Debris, 2021, pp. 1–3.
- ESA, “Space debris by the numbers,” ESA Newsletter, vol. 8, 2019.
- E. M. Botta, I. Sharf, and A. K. Misra, “Simulation of tether-nets for capture of space debris and small asteroids,” Acta Astronautica, vol. 155, pp. 448–461, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0094576518303953
- V. S. Aslanov and A. S. Ledkov, “Survey of tether system technology for space debris removal missions,” Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, vol. 0, no. 0, pp. 1–81, 0. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.2514/1.A35646
- C. Phipps, K. Baker, B. Bradford, E. George, S. Libby, D. Liedahl, B. Marcovici, S. Olivier, L. Pleasance, J. Reilly, A. Rubenchik, D. Strafford, and M. Valley, “Removing orbital debris with lasers,” Advances in Space Research, vol. 49, 10 2011.
- C. Hou, Y. Yang, Y. Yang, K. Yang, X. Zhang, and J. Lu, “Electromagnetic-launch-based method for cost-efficient space debris removal,” Open Astronomy, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 94–106, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1515/astro-2020-0016
- A. Parness, “Testing gecko-like adhesives aboard the international space station,” 09 2017.
- Y. Zhang, J. Quan, P. Li, W. Song, G. Zhang, L. Li, and D. Zhou, “A flytrap-inspired bistable origami-based gripper for rapid active debris removal,” Advanced Intelligent Systems, vol. 5, no. 7, p. 2200468, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/aisy.202200468
- X. Li, Z. Chen, and Y. Wang, “Detumbling a space target using soft robotic manipulators,” in 2022 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation (ICMA), 2022, pp. 1807–1812.