Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
41 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
41 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
7 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

A Survey on Detection of LLMs-Generated Content (2310.15654v1)

Published 24 Oct 2023 in cs.CL, cs.AI, cs.CY, cs.HC, and cs.LG
A Survey on Detection of LLMs-Generated Content

Abstract: The burgeoning capabilities of advanced LLMs such as ChatGPT have led to an increase in synthetic content generation with implications across a variety of sectors, including media, cybersecurity, public discourse, and education. As such, the ability to detect LLMs-generated content has become of paramount importance. We aim to provide a detailed overview of existing detection strategies and benchmarks, scrutinizing their differences and identifying key challenges and prospects in the field, advocating for more adaptable and robust models to enhance detection accuracy. We also posit the necessity for a multi-faceted approach to defend against various attacks to counter the rapidly advancing capabilities of LLMs. To the best of our knowledge, this work is the first comprehensive survey on the detection in the era of LLMs. We hope it will provide a broad understanding of the current landscape of LLMs-generated content detection, offering a guiding reference for researchers and practitioners striving to uphold the integrity of digital information in an era increasingly dominated by synthetic content. The relevant papers are summarized and will be consistently updated at https://github.com/Xianjun-Yang/Awesome_papers_on_LLMs_detection.git.

An Analytical Overview of LLM-Generated Content Detection

In recent years, the proliferation of advanced LLMs, such as ChatGPT and GPT-4, has elevated the capability of machines to generate text that closely mimics human-written content. This progress, while offering remarkable advancements across various sectors like media, cybersecurity, and education, has also posed significant challenges, necessitating robust methods for detecting synthetic content. The paper "A Survey on Detection of LLMs-Generated Content" by Xianjun Yang et al. presents a comprehensive survey of state-of-the-art detection methodologies, highlighting the myriad challenges and suggesting future directions for research in this critical area.

Overview and Core Contributions

The paper endeavors to offer an exhaustive overview of existing detection strategies for LLM-generated content, benchmarking various approaches and illustrating the nuances of their functionalities. It distinctly categorizes the detection methodologies into three main classes: training-based methods, zero-shot methods, and watermarking techniques. Each category is meticulously analyzed within different operational scenarios—ranging from black-box to white-box detection—to reflect the practical realities faced by researchers and developers in this domain.

Key Findings and Methodologies

1. Training-based Methods:

These methods involve the use of classifiers trained on collected binary datasets, where the detectors are fine-tuned on both human and AI-generated text distributions. The paper highlights the increasing interest in detecting high-quality text from LLMs, citing approaches like OpenAI's own text classifier and GPTZero, which utilize mixed sources and decoding strategies to enhance robustness.

2. Zero-shot Methods:

Featuring prominently in the discourse on adaptability, zero-shot detectors leverage intrinsic properties of LLMs for detection without requiring extensive training data. Noteworthy approaches like DNA-GPT and DetectGPT demonstrate how probability divergence and sample perturbations can facilitate effective detection. This category underscores the importance of adaptability in response to dynamically evolving LLM architectures.

3. Watermarking Techniques:

The paper elaborates on watermarking as a strategic solution, embedding identifiable patterns within generated text to ascertain origin. The review encompasses both traditional watermarking methods and novel training-free techniques like soft watermarking, which manipulates sampling processes without degrading text quality.

Numerical Results and Implications

The paper provides a detailed comptline of various datasets utilized for detection tasks, including TURINGBENCH and M4, emphasizing their pivotal role in evaluating detection methods. The effectiveness of each detection technique is juxtaposed against these datasets, showcasing metrics like AUROC scores and True Positive Rates at fixed False Positive Rates. This rigorous analysis yields a nuanced understanding of detection efficacy under varied conditions and points to the necessity for multi-faceted models capable of generalizing across different model families and attack vectors.

Challenges and Future Directions

The paper identifies several critical challenges that impede progress in this domain. Among them, overcoming adversarial attacks and paraphrasing remain paramount, as these can significantly destabilize detector performance. Furthermore, the challenge of detecting LLM-generated code—a task distinct from natural language detection due to variable entropy and text length—requires special attention to realize robust solutions.

Moving forward, the authors suggest that refining detection methodologies to improve scalability, robustness to novel LLM updates, and generalization to unseen data distributions are essential. Moreover, enhancing the explainability of detection decisions and developing standardized benchmarks to measure detector effectiveness are pivotal areas for future exploration.

Conclusion

In essence, the survey by Yang et al. is a timely and well-articulated compendium of the current landscape in LLM-generated content detection. It underscores the pressing need for innovative and scalable solutions in this rapidly evolving field. As LLMs continue to advance, the ability to discern machine-generated content with precision will be integral to maintaining the integrity of digital information and addressing ethical concerns associated with LLM usage. Researchers and practitioners are thus presented with a roadmap, built on a foundation of comprehensive analysis, to guide future endeavors in this indispensable scientific pursuit.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (7)
  1. Xianjun Yang (37 papers)
  2. Liangming Pan (59 papers)
  3. Xuandong Zhao (47 papers)
  4. Haifeng Chen (99 papers)
  5. Linda Petzold (45 papers)
  6. William Yang Wang (254 papers)
  7. Wei Cheng (175 papers)
Citations (33)
Github Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com