Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
102 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

MatFormer: Nested Transformer for Elastic Inference (2310.07707v1)

Published 11 Oct 2023 in cs.LG, cs.CL, and cs.CV

Abstract: Transformer models are deployed in a wide range of settings, from multi-accelerator clusters to standalone mobile phones. The diverse inference constraints in these scenarios necessitate practitioners to train foundation models such as PaLM 2, Llama, & ViTs as a series of models of varying sizes. Due to significant training costs, only a select few model sizes are trained and supported, limiting more fine-grained control over relevant tradeoffs, including latency, cost, and accuracy. This work introduces MatFormer, a nested Transformer architecture designed to offer elasticity in a variety of deployment constraints. Each Feed Forward Network (FFN) block of a MatFormer model is jointly optimized with a few nested smaller FFN blocks. This training procedure allows for the Mix'n'Match of model granularities across layers -- i.e., a trained universal MatFormer model enables extraction of hundreds of accurate smaller models, which were never explicitly optimized. We empirically demonstrate MatFormer's effectiveness across different model classes (decoders & encoders), modalities (language & vision), and scales (up to 2.6B parameters). We find that a 2.6B decoder-only MatFormer LLM (MatLM) allows us to extract smaller models spanning from 1.5B to 2.6B, each exhibiting comparable validation loss and one-shot downstream evaluations to their independently trained counterparts. Furthermore, we observe that smaller encoders extracted from a universal MatFormer-based ViT (MatViT) encoder preserve the metric-space structure for adaptive large-scale retrieval. Finally, we showcase that speculative decoding with the accurate and consistent submodels extracted from MatFormer can further reduce inference latency.

MatFormer: Nested Transformer for Elastic Inference

The paper "MatFormer: Nested Transformer for Elastic Inference" proposes a novel architecture in the domain of transformer-based models to address the critical challenge of adaptability and elasticity in diverse deployment environments. Traditional transformer models, such as those used in LLMs or vision transformers (ViTs), require a predefined model size for each deployment scenario, thus necessitating a series of independently trained models. This approach comes with significant training overheads and limited flexibility, especially when fine-grained control over trade-offs between latency, cost, and accuracy is required.

Key Contributions

1. Introduction of MatFormer:

MatFormer is introduced as a nested transformer architecture facilitating elastic inference. Each feed-forward network (FFN) block in a MatFormer incorporates a few nested smaller FFNs, enabling the extraction of hundreds of accurate submodels without additional retraining. This inherently nested structure offers unprecedented flexibility, allowing practitioners to tailor the model granularity dynamically based on deployment constraints.

2. Empirical Validation Across Modalities:

The authors empirically validate MatFormer across multiple model classes (decoders and encoders), modalities (language and vision), and scales (up to 2.6 billion parameters). For LLMs, MatFormer-based LLMs (MatLMs) are benchmarked against traditional independently trained baseline models. For vision models, MatFormer-based Vision Transformers (MatViTs) are tested on tasks such as image classification and retrieval. The results demonstrate that MatFormer not only matches the accuracy of the baseline models but also exhibits better scalability and flexibility.

3. Speculative Decoding and Elastic Encoders:

The paper showcases how MatFormer submodels can be utilized for faster autoregressive generation through speculative decoding, leveraging the consistent behavior of the smaller submodels with the largest model. Additionally, MatFormer-based encoders are shown to enable elastic query encoding for adaptive dense retrieval, reducing compute overhead significantly while maintaining high accuracy.

Experimental Findings

LLMs (MatLMs):

For MatLMs, spanning scales from 78M to 2.6B parameters, the authors report that the models trained with MatFormer architecture generalize well and provide competitive performance compared to their baseline counterparts. Specifically:

  • The validation loss and downstream evaluation scores of MatLM submodels are comparable to those of independently trained models.
  • MatFormer’s Mix’n’Match capability allows extracting numerous models along the accuracy-compute curve, providing a fine-grained balance without additional training costs.
  • Consistency metrics reveal that submodels extracted from MatFormer are significantly more consistent, enhancing their utility in speculative decoding.

Vision Transformers (MatViTs):

For MatViTs, the experiments conducted on ImageNet-1K reveal:

  • MatViT models often outperform the corresponding baseline ViT models.
  • The ability to adaptively use Mix’n’Match models enhances elastic inference, leading to better utilization of available computational resources while preserving accuracy.
  • For large-scale adaptive image retrieval, MatViTs demonstrate the capability to preserve metric-space consistency, allowing real-time adaptive query encoding.

Implications

Practical Implications:

MatFormer architecture addresses the pressing need for adaptable, efficient models capable of catering to diverse deployment scenarios, from mobile devices with limited computational power to large-scale multi-accelerator clusters. By providing a single universal model that can dynamically adjust its computational requirements, MatFormer reduces the necessity to train and maintain multiple model versions, significantly optimizing resource usage.

Theoretical Implications:

The nested structure of MatFormer challenges the conventional independent training paradigm, proposing a shift towards joint optimization of model granularities. This could pave the way for future research into more generalized and universally adaptable model architectures, potentially influencing how both foundational and specialized models are designed and trained.

Future Directions

Several future research directions stem from this work:

  • Hyperparameter optimization and initialization strategies: Fine-tuning the training procedure to address the limitations identified, such as improvement in embedding and token-level operations.
  • Real-time adaptation algorithms: Developing efficient algorithms to dynamically select the best-performing model configuration from the nested submodels according to real-time constraints.
  • Extension to other architectures: Exploring the adaptability of the nested structure in other neural network architectures beyond transformers.

In conclusion, MatFormer represents a significant advancement in the design of adaptable AI models, with practical benefits in deployment flexibility and resource efficiency. Its empirical success across multiple tasks and modalities suggests it as a promising direction for future research and application in AI deployment frameworks.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (65)
  1. Palm 2 technical report. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.10403, 2023.
  2. Semantic parsing on freebase from question-answer pairs. In Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 2013. URL https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:6401679.
  3. Flexivit: One model for all patch sizes. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp.  14496–14506, 2023.
  4. Piqa: Reasoning about physical commonsense in natural language, 2019.
  5. On the opportunities and risks of foundation models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.07258, 2021.
  6. Language models are few-shot learners. Advances in neural information processing systems, 33:1877–1901, 2020.
  7. Once-for-all: Train one network and specialize it for efficient deployment. arXiv preprint arXiv:1908.09791, 2019.
  8. Vision transformer slimming: Multi-dimension searching in continuous optimization space. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp.  4931–4941, 2022.
  9. Accelerating large language model decoding with speculative sampling. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.01318, 2023.
  10. Deep learning for instance retrieval: A survey. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2022.
  11. Palm: Scaling language modeling with pathways, 2022.
  12. Think you have solved question answering? try arc, the ai2 reasoning challenge, 2018.
  13. Flashattention: Fast and memory-efficient exact attention with io-awareness. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35:16344–16359, 2022.
  14. Scenic: A jax library for computer vision research and beyond. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp.  21393–21398, 2022.
  15. Scaling vision transformers to 22 billion parameters. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 7480–7512. PMLR, 2023.
  16. Imagenet: A large-scale hierarchical image database. In 2009 IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp.  248–255. Ieee, 2009.
  17. The case for 4-bit precision: k-bit inference scaling laws. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 7750–7774. PMLR, 2023.
  18. An image is worth 16x16 words: Transformers for image recognition at scale. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.11929, 2020.
  19. Glam: Efficient scaling of language models with mixture-of-experts, 2022.
  20. Dynamic convnets on tiny devices via nested sparsity. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 10(6):5073–5082, 2022.
  21. Gaussian error linear units (gelus). arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.08415, 2016.
  22. Training compute-optimal large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.15556, 2022.
  23. Dynabert: Dynamic bert with adaptive width and depth. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33:9782–9793, 2020.
  24. Compressing llms: The truth is rarely pure and never simple, 2023.
  25. TriviaQA: A large scale distantly supervised challenge dataset for reading comprehension. In Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pp.  1601–1611, Vancouver, Canada, July 2017. Association for Computational Linguistics. doi: 10.18653/v1/P17-1147. URL https://aclanthology.org/P17-1147.
  26. Scaling laws for neural language models. 2020.
  27. Alex Krizhevsky. Convolutional neural networks for object classification in cuda. University of Toronto, EECE1742S: Programming Massively Parallel Multiprocessors Using CUDA, 2009.
  28. Sentencepiece: A simple and language independent subword tokenizer and detokenizer for neural text processing. arXiv preprint arXiv:1808.06226, 2018.
  29. Beyond distillation: Task-level mixture-of-experts for efficient inference. arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.03742, 2021.
  30. Soft threshold weight reparameterization for learnable sparsity. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 5544–5555. PMLR, 2020.
  31. Matryoshka representation learning. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35:30233–30249, 2022.
  32. Natural questions: A benchmark for question answering research. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 7:452–466, 2019. doi: 10.1162/tacl˙a˙00276. URL https://aclanthology.org/Q19-1026.
  33. Block pruning for faster transformers. arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.04838, 2021.
  34. Race: Large-scale reading comprehension dataset from examinations, 2017.
  35. The winograd schema challenge. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, KR’12, pp. 552–561. AAAI Press, 2012. ISBN 9781577355601.
  36. Fast inference from transformers via speculative decoding. 2023.
  37. Branch-train-merge: Embarrassingly parallel training of expert language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2208.03306, 2022.
  38. Generating wikipedia by summarizing long sequences. arXiv preprint arXiv:1801.10198, 2018.
  39. Can a suit of armor conduct electricity? a new dataset for open book question answering, 2018.
  40. A corpus and cloze evaluation for deeper understanding of commonsense stories. In Proceedings of the 2016 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, pp.  839–849, San Diego, California, June 2016. Association for Computational Linguistics. doi: 10.18653/v1/N16-1098. URL https://aclanthology.org/N16-1098.
  41. Adversarial nli: A new benchmark for natural language understanding, 2020.
  42. R OpenAI. Gpt-4 technical report. arXiv, pp.  2303–08774, 2023.
  43. The lambada dataset: Word prediction requiring a broad discourse context, 2016.
  44. Robust speech recognition via large-scale weak supervision. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 28492–28518. PMLR, 2023.
  45. Know what you don’t know: Unanswerable questions for SQuAD. In Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 2: Short Papers), pp.  784–789, Melbourne, Australia, July 2018. Association for Computational Linguistics. doi: 10.18653/v1/P18-2124. URL https://aclanthology.org/P18-2124.
  46. Imagenet large scale visual recognition challenge. International journal of computer vision, 115:211–252, 2015.
  47. Winogrande: An adversarial winograd schema challenge at scale, 2019.
  48. Sharcs: Efficient transformers through routing with dynamic width sub-networks. Findings of Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 2023.
  49. Distilbert, a distilled version of bert: smaller, faster, cheaper and lighter. arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.01108, 2019.
  50. Confident adaptive language modeling. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35:17456–17472, 2022.
  51. Adafactor: Adaptive learning rates with sublinear memory cost. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 4596–4604. PMLR, 2018.
  52. Primer: Searching for efficient transformers for language modeling. arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.08668, 2021.
  53. How to train your vit? data, augmentation, and regularization in vision transformers. arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.10270, 2021.
  54. Lamda: Language models for dialog applications. arXiv preprint arXiv:2201.08239, 2022.
  55. Llama: Open and efficient foundation language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.13971, 2023a.
  56. Llama 2: Open foundation and fine-tuned chat models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.09288, 2023b.
  57. Sortednet, a place for every network and every network in its place: Towards a generalized solution for training many-in-one neural networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.00255, 2023.
  58. Attention is all you need. 2023.
  59. Superglue: A stickier benchmark for general-purpose language understanding systems, 2020a.
  60. Multiple networks are more efficient than one: Fast and accurate models via ensembles and cascades. arXiv preprint arXiv:2012.01988, 2020b.
  61. Tensor programs v: Tuning large neural networks via zero-shot hyperparameter transfer. arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.03466, 2022.
  62. Universally slimmable networks and improved training techniques. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, pp.  1803–1811, 2019.
  63. Slimmable neural networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1812.08928, 2018.
  64. Hellaswag: Can a machine really finish your sentence?, 2019.
  65. Ensemble machine learning: methods and applications. Springer, 2012.
User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (11)
  1. Devvrit (3 papers)
  2. Sneha Kudugunta (14 papers)
  3. Aditya Kusupati (28 papers)
  4. Tim Dettmers (22 papers)
  5. Kaifeng Chen (18 papers)
  6. Inderjit Dhillon (25 papers)
  7. Yulia Tsvetkov (142 papers)
  8. Hannaneh Hajishirzi (176 papers)
  9. Sham Kakade (84 papers)
  10. Ali Farhadi (138 papers)
  11. Prateek Jain (131 papers)
Citations (15)
Youtube Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com