Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
156 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Learning Informative Latent Representation for Quantum State Tomography (2310.00518v1)

Published 30 Sep 2023 in quant-ph and cs.AI

Abstract: Quantum state tomography (QST) is the process of reconstructing the complete state of a quantum system (mathematically described as a density matrix) through a series of different measurements. These measurements are performed on a number of identical copies of the quantum system, with outcomes gathered as frequencies. QST aims to recover the density matrix and the corresponding properties of the quantum state from the measured frequencies. Although an informationally complete set of measurements can specify quantum state accurately in an ideal scenario with a large number of identical copies, both measurements and identical copies are restricted and imperfect in practical scenarios, making QST highly ill-posed. The conventional QST methods usually assume adequate or accurate measured frequencies or rely on manually designed regularizers to handle the ill-posed reconstruction problem, suffering from limited applications in realistic scenarios. Recent advances in deep neural networks (DNNs) led to the emergence of deep learning (DL) in QST. However, existing DL-based QST approaches often employ generic DNN models that are not optimized for imperfect conditions of QST. In this paper, we propose a transformer-based autoencoder architecture tailored for QST with imperfect measurement data. Our method leverages a transformer-based encoder to extract an informative latent representation (ILR) from imperfect measurement data and employs a decoder to predict the quantum states based on the ILR. We anticipate that the high-dimensional ILR will capture more comprehensive information about quantum states. To achieve this, we conduct pre-training of the encoder using a pretext task that involves reconstructing high-quality frequencies from measured frequencies. Extensive simulations and experiments demonstrate the remarkable ability of the ILR in dealing with imperfect measurement data in QST.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (45)
  1. Improving quantum state estimation with mutually unbiased bases. Physical Review Letters, 105(3):030406, 2010.
  2. Quantifying coherence. Physical Review Letters, 113(14):140401, 2014.
  3. Language models are few-shot learners. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33:1877–1901, 2020.
  4. Jumping nlp curves: A review of natural language processing research. IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine, 9(2):48–57, 2014.
  5. Attention-based quantum tomography. Machine Learning: Science and Technology, 3(1):01LT01, 2021.
  6. Quantum state tomography with time-continuous measurements: reconstruction with resource limitations. Quantum Studies: Mathematics and Foundations, pages 1–25, 2019.
  7. Machine learning pipeline for quantum state estimation with incomplete measurements. Machine Learning: Science and Technology, 2(3):035014, 2021.
  8. Choice of measurement sets in qubit tomography. Physical Review A, 78(5):052122, 2008.
  9. Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.04805, 2018.
  10. Image super-resolution using deep convolutional networks. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 38(2):295–307, 2015.
  11. An image is worth 16x16 words: Transformers for image recognition at scale. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.11929, 2020.
  12. Quantum tomography via compressed sensing: error bounds, sample complexity and efficient estimators. New Journal of Physics, 14(9):095022, 2012.
  13. Eigenvalue statistics of the real ginibre ensemble. Physical Review Letters, 99(5):050603, 2007.
  14. Learning quantum systems. Nature Reviews Physics, pages 1–16, 2023.
  15. Masked autoencoders are scalable vision learners. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 16000–16009, 2022.
  16. Nicholas J Higham. Analysis of the Cholesky Decomposition of a Semi-definite Matrix. Oxford University Press, 1990.
  17. Autoencoders, minimum description length and helmholtz free energy. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 6, 1993.
  18. Denoising diffusion probabilistic models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33:6840–6851, 2020.
  19. Predicting many properties of a quantum system from very few measurements. Nature Physics, 16(10):1050–1057, 2020.
  20. Adaptive Bayesian quantum tomography. Physical Review A, 85(5):052120, 2012.
  21. Quantum inference of states and processes. Physical Review A, 68(1):012305, 2003.
  22. Auto-encoding variational Bayes. arXiv preprint arXiv:1312.6114, 2013.
  23. Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE, 86(11):2278–2324, 1998.
  24. Quantum metrology with imperfect measurements. Nature Communications, 13(1):6971, 2022.
  25. Quantum tomography for solid-state qubits. EPL (Europhysics Letters), 67(6):874, 2004.
  26. Swin transformer: Hierarchical vision transformer using shifted windows. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 10012–10022, 2021.
  27. Machine learning assisted quantum state estimation. Machine Learning: Science and Technology, 1(3):035007, 2020.
  28. On the experimental feasibility of quantum state reconstruction via machine learning. IEEE Transactions on Quantum Engineering, 2:1–10, 2021.
  29. A comparative study on how neural networks enhance quantum state tomography. arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.09504, 2021.
  30. Francesco Mezzadri. How to generate random matrices from the classical compact groups. arXiv preprint math-ph/0609050, 2006.
  31. Quantum Computation and Quantum Information. Cambridge University Press, 2010.
  32. Least-squares inversion for density-matrix reconstruction. Physical Review A, 56(3):1788, 1997.
  33. Masanao Ozawa. Entanglement measures and the Hilbert–Schmidt distance. Physics Letters A, 268(3):158–160, 2000.
  34. Experimental neural network enhanced quantum tomography. npj Quantum Information, 6:20, 2020.
  35. Quantum state tomography via linear regression estimation. Scientific Reports, 3:3496, 2013.
  36. Adaptive quantum state tomography via linear regression estimation: Theory and two-qubit experiment. npj Quantum Information, 3:19, 2017.
  37. Improving language understanding by generative pre-training. 2018.
  38. Exploring the limits of transfer learning with a unified text-to-text transformer. The Journal of Machine Learning Research, 21(1):5485–5551, 2020.
  39. Robust and efficient high-dimensional quantum state tomography. Physical Review Letters, 126(10):100402, 2021.
  40. Incomplete quantum state estimation: A comprehensive study. Physical Review A, 85(4):042317, 2012.
  41. Attention is all you need. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30, 2017.
  42. Neural network state estimation for full quantum state tomography. arXiv preprint arXiv:1811.06654, 2018.
  43. Transformer quantum state: A multi-purpose model for quantum many-body problems. arXiv preprint arXiv:2208.01758, 2022.
  44. Quantum state tomography inspired by language modeling. arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.04940, 2022.
  45. Flexible learning of quantum states with generative query neural networks. Nature communications, 13(1):1–10, 2022.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.