Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
41 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
41 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
7 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Pushing Large Language Models to the 6G Edge: Vision, Challenges, and Opportunities (2309.16739v3)

Published 28 Sep 2023 in cs.LG and cs.AI

Abstract: LLMs, which have shown remarkable capabilities, are revolutionizing AI development and potentially shaping our future. However, given their multimodality, the status quo cloud-based deployment faces some critical challenges: 1) long response time; 2) high bandwidth costs; and 3) the violation of data privacy. 6G mobile edge computing (MEC) systems may resolve these pressing issues. In this article, we explore the potential of deploying LLMs at the 6G edge. We start by introducing killer applications powered by multimodal LLMs, including robotics and healthcare, to highlight the need for deploying LLMs in the vicinity of end users. Then, we identify the critical challenges for LLM deployment at the edge and envision the 6G MEC architecture for LLMs. Furthermore, we delve into two design aspects, i.e., edge training and edge inference for LLMs. In both aspects, considering the inherent resource limitations at the edge, we discuss various cutting-edge techniques, including split learning/inference, parameter-efficient fine-tuning, quantization, and parameter-sharing inference, to facilitate the efficient deployment of LLMs. This article serves as a position paper for thoroughly identifying the motivation, challenges, and pathway for empowering LLMs at the 6G edge.

Pushing LLMs to the 6G Edge: Vision, Challenges, and Opportunities

The paper "Pushing LLMs to the 6G Edge: Vision, Challenges, and Opportunities" by Zheng Lin et al. explores the strategic implementation of LLMs in 6G mobile edge computing systems, aiming to address significant challenges posed by cloud-based deployments. LLMs, such as GPT-3, PALM, and LLaMA, have demonstrated remarkable generalization capabilities, but their reliance on centralized cloud infrastructure results in drawbacks such as increased latency, high bandwidth costs, and data privacy concerns.

Motivating Applications and Existing Challenges

LLMs can be leveraged for mission-critical applications, notably in healthcare and robotics, where the proximity to end-users is crucial for real-time inference and privacy preservation. In healthcare, LLMs like Google's Med-PaLM 2 have been fine-tuned to understand medical inquiries with high accuracy, marking their potential as AI generalists in medical diagnostics. However, centralizing multimodal data inputs for cloud processing poses significant challenges regarding bandwidth and privacy. Similarly, in robotics, LLMs facilitate complex task sequencing—a process highly sensitive to latency—highlighting the need for LLM deployment at the network edge.

To realize edge-based LLM deployment, the paper identifies key challenges: heavy communication overheads due to large model sizes, substantial computational demands exceeding current edge capabilities, and significant storage requirements for models with billions of parameters.

Architectural Overview and Techniques

The proposed 6G MEC architecture for LLM deployment features several modules: network management for orchestrating distributed resources, edge model caching for strategic model placement, and processes for efficient edge model training and inference.

Edge Model Training

The paper examines approaches to enable efficient LLM fine-tuning in 6G edge networks:

  1. On-device Fine-Tuning: Techniques such as parameter-efficient fine-tuning (e.g., LoRA) are highlighted for minimizing the fraction of parameters updated, thereby reducing computational and communication costs. Quantized training is another strategy discussed to significantly alleviate memory and CPU pressure.
  2. Device-Server Co-training: Split learning (SL), including methods like SplitFed learning, is explored for its privacy-preserving and resource-efficient training capabilities. The paper suggests multiple server collaborations in a mesh network for distributed workload partitioning.

Edge Model Inference

To combat latency and resource limitations during inference:

  1. On-device Inference: Quantization methods (e.g., PTQ) allow for running low-precision models on devices, optimizing trade-offs between inference speed and accuracy. The parameter-sharing technique is suggested for reducing memory usage when multiple models share common parameters.
  2. Device-Server Co-inference: Split inference techniques are proposed to offload workloads, leveraging speculative decoding processes for real-time applications, where small models on devices generate preliminary predictions validated by larger models on edge servers.

Addressing Open Problems

The paper proposes directions for further research:

  • Energy-efficient Edge Intelligence: Focused on minimizing power consumption via strategic scheduling and selection of models based on task complexity.
  • Privacy-preserving Methods: Ensuring robust privacy by deploying differential privacy techniques, necessitating new client selection algorithms.

Conclusion

Overall, the paper by Lin et al. positions itself as a foundational work highlighting the potential of deploying LLMs at the mobile edge, leveraging techniques that align with the constraints and capabilities of 6G networks. By addressing latency, bandwidth, and privacy issues, the research opens avenues for further exploration into edge computing's role in AI development and implementation, inspiring interdisciplinary research efforts in the community.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (14)
  1. J. Wei, Y. Tay, R. Bommasani, C. Raffel, B. Zoph, S. Borgeaud, D. Yogatama, M. Bosma, D. Zhou, D. Metzler et al., “Emergent Abilities of Large Language Models,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.07682, Jun. 2022.
  2. D. Driess, F. Xia, M. S. Sajjadi, C. Lynch, A. Chowdhery, B. Ichter, A. Wahid, J. Tompson, Q. Vuong, T. Yu et al., “Palm-e: An Embodied Multimodal Language Model,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.03378, Mar. 2023.
  3. M. Moor, O. Banerjee, Z. S. H. Abad, H. M. Krumholz, J. Leskovec, E. J. Topol, and P. Rajpurkar, “Foundation Models for Generalist Medical Artificial Intelligence,” Nature, vol. 616, no. 7956, pp. 259–265, Apr. 2023.
  4. T. Dettmers, A. Pagnoni, A. Holtzman, and L. Zettlemoyer, “QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMs,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.14314, May. 2023.
  5. Y. Shen, J. Shao, X. Zhang, Z. Lin, H. Pan, D. Li, J. Zhang, and K. B. Letaief, “Large Language Models Empowered Autonomous Edge AI for Connected Intelligence,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.02779, 2023.
  6. L. Bariah, Q. Zhao, H. Zou, Y. Tian, F. Bader, and M. Debbah, “Large Language Models for Telecom: The Next Big Thing?” arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.10249, 2023.
  7. Nvidia, “Fastertransformer,” 2023. [Online]. Available: https://github.com/NVIDIA/FasterTransformer
  8. E. J. Hu, Y. Shen, P. Wallis, Z. Allen-Zhu, Y. Li, S. Wang, L. Wang, and W. Chen, “LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Models,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.09685, Jun. 2021.
  9. D. Alistarh, D. Grubic, J. Li, R. Tomioka, and M. Vojnovic, “QSGD: Communication-efficient SGD via Gradient Quantization and Encoding,” Proc. NIPS, Dec. 2017.
  10. H. Xi, C. Li, J. Chen, and J. Zhu, “Training Transformers with 4-bit Integers,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.11987, Jun. 2023.
  11. Z. Lin, G. Qu, X. Chen, and K. Huang, “Split Learning in 6G Edge Networks,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.12194, Jan. 2024.
  12. R. Yi, L. Guo, S. Wei, A. Zhou, S. Wang, and M. Xu, “EdgeMoE: Fast On-Device Inference of MoE-based Large Language Models,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.14352, 2023.
  13. A. Padmanabhan, N. Agarwal, A. Iyer, G. Ananthanarayanan, Y. Shu, N. Karianakis, G. H. Xu, and R. Netravali, “GEMEL: Model Merging for Memory-Efficient, Real-Time Video Analytics at the Edge,” in Proc. NSDI, Apr. 2023.
  14. Y. Leviathan, M. Kalman, and Y. Matias, “Fast Inference From Transformers via Speculative Decoding,” in Proc. ICML, 2023.
User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (6)
  1. Zheng Lin (104 papers)
  2. Guanqiao Qu (9 papers)
  3. Qiyuan Chen (22 papers)
  4. Xianhao Chen (50 papers)
  5. Zhe Chen (237 papers)
  6. Kaibin Huang (186 papers)
Citations (60)
Youtube Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com