A Passive Variable Impedance Control Strategy with Viscoelastic Parameters Estimation of Soft Tissues for Safe Ultrasonography (2309.14893v2)
Abstract: In the context of telehealth, robotic approaches have proven a valuable solution to in-person visits in remote areas, with decreased costs for patients and infection risks. In particular, in ultrasonography, robots have the potential to reproduce the skills required to acquire high-quality images while reducing the sonographer's physical efforts. In this paper, we address the control of the interaction of the probe with the patient's body, a critical aspect of ensuring safe and effective ultrasonography. We introduce a novel approach based on variable impedance control, allowing real-time optimisation of a compliant controller parameters during ultrasound procedures. This optimisation is formulated as a quadratic programming problem and incorporates physical constraints derived from viscoelastic parameter estimations. Safety and passivity constraints, including an energy tank, are also integrated to minimise potential risks during human-robot interaction. The proposed method's efficacy is demonstrated through experiments on a patient dummy torso, highlighting its potential for achieving safe behaviour and accurate force control during ultrasound procedures, even in cases of contact loss.
- European Reference Networks and Digital Health, “Market study on telemedicine,” European Commission, Tech. Rep., 2018. [Online]. Available: http://europa.eu
- Digital Health and Innovation, “Consolidated telemedicine implementation guide,” World Health Organization, Tech. Rep., 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240059184
- S. Avgousti, E. G. Christoforou, A. S. Panayides, S. Voskarides, C. Novales, L. Nouaille, C. S. Pattichis, and P. Vieyres, “Medical telerobotic systems: current status and future trends,” BioMedical Engineering OnLine 2016 15:1, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 1–44, 8 2016. [Online]. Available: https://biomedical-engineering-online.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12938-016-0217-7
- C. T. Coffin, “Work-related musculoskeletal disorders in sonographers: A review of causes and types of injury and best practices for reducing injury risk,” Reports in Medical Imaging, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 15–26, 2014. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/RMI.S34724
- K. Li, Y. Xu, and M. Q. Meng, “An Overview of Systems and Techniques for Autonomous Robotic Ultrasound Acquisitions,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Robotics and Bionics, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 510–524, 5 2021.
- X. Ma, W. Y. Kuo, K. Yang, A. Rahaman, and H. K. Zhang, “A-SEE: Active-Sensing End-Effector Enabled Probe Self-Normal-Positioning for Robotic Ultrasound Imaging Applications,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 12 475–12 482, 10 2022.
- J. Tan, Y. Li, B. Li, Y. Leng, J. Peng, J. Wu, B. Luo, X. Chen, Y. Rong, and C. Fu, “Automatic Generation of Autonomous Ultrasound Scanning Trajectory Based on 3-D Point Cloud,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Robotics and Bionics, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 976–990, 11 2022.
- C. Hennersperger, B. Fuerst, S. Virga, O. Zettinig, B. Frisch, T. Neff, and N. Navab, “Towards MRI-Based Autonomous Robotic US Acquisitions: A First Feasibility Study,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 538–548, 2 2017.
- J. Zhan, J. Cartucho, and S. Giannarou, “Autonomous Tissue Scanning under Free-Form Motion for Intraoperative Tissue Characterisation,” Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 11 147–11 154, 5 2020.
- M. C. Roshan, A. Pranata, and M. Isaksson, “Robotic Ultrasonography for Autonomous Non-Invasive Diagnosis - A Systematic Literature Review,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Robotics and Bionics, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 863–874, 11 2022.
- F. von Haxthausen, S. Böttger, D. Wulff, J. Hagenah, V. García-Vázquez, and S. Ipsen, “Medical Robotics for Ultrasound Imaging: Current Systems and Future Trends,” Current Robotics Reports 2021 2:1, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 55–71, 2 2021. [Online]. Available: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s43154-020-00037-y
- Z. Jiang, S. E. Salcudean, and N. Navab, “Robotic ultrasound imaging: State-of-the-art and future perspectives,” Medical Image Analysis, vol. 89, p. 102878, 10 2023. [Online]. Available: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S136184152300138X
- S. Merouche, L. Allard, E. Montagnon, G. Soulez, P. Bigras, and G. Cloutier, “A robotic ultrasound scanner for automatic vessel tracking and three-dimensional reconstruction of b-mode images,” IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 35–46, 1 2016.
- R. Tsumura and H. Iwata, “Robotic fetal ultrasonography platform with a passive scan mechanism,” International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, vol. 15, no. 8, pp. 1323–1333, 8 2020. [Online]. Available: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11548-020-02130-1
- S. Virga, O. Zettinig, M. Esposito, K. Pfister, B. Frisch, T. Neff, N. Navab, and C. Hennersperger, “Automatic force-compliant robotic Ultrasound screening of abdominal aortic aneurysms,” IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, vol. 2016-November, pp. 508–513, 11 2016.
- A. Pappalardo, A. Albakri, C. Liu, L. Bascetta, E. De Momi, and P. Poignet, “Hunt–Crossley model based force control for minimally invasive robotic surgery,” Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, vol. 29, pp. 31–43, 8 2016.
- M. Ferro, C. Gaz, M. Anzidei, and M. Vendittelli, “Online Needle-Tissue Interaction Model Identification for Force Feedback Enhancement in Robot-Assisted Interventional Procedures,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Robotics and Bionics, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 936–947, 11 2021.
- Z. Jiang, M. Grimm, M. Zhou, Y. Hu, J. Esteban, and N. Navab, “Automatic Force-Based Probe Positioning for Precise Robotic Ultrasound Acquisition,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 68, no. 11, pp. 11 200–11 211, 11 2021.
- J. Wang, C. Lu, Y. Lv, S. Yang, M. Zhang, and Y. Shen, “Task Space Compliant Control and Six-Dimensional Force Regulation Toward Automated Robotic Ultrasound Imaging,” IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 2023.
- A. Duan, M. Victorova, J. Zhao, Y. Sun, Y. Zheng, and D. Navarro-Alarcon, “Ultrasound-Guided Assistive Robots for Scoliosis Assessment With Optimization-Based Control and Variable Impedance,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 8106–8113, 7 2022.
- K. H. Hunt and F. R. Crossley, “Coefficient of Restitution Interpreted as Damping in Vibroimpact,” Journal of Applied Mechanics, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 440–445, 6 1975. [Online]. Available: https://dx.doi.org/10.1115/1.3423596
- N. Özkaya, M. Nordin, D. Goldsheyder, and D. Leger, “Fundamentals of biomechanics: Equilibrium, motion, and deformation: Third edition,” Fundamentals of Biomechanics: Equilibrium, Motion, and Deformation: Third Edition, pp. 1–275, 1 2012.
- N. Diolaiti, C. Melchiorri, and S. Stramigioli, “Contact impedance estimation for robotic systems,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 925–935, 10 2005.
- J. D’Errico, “Surface fitting using gridfit,” MATLAB central file exchange, vol. 643, 2005.
- P. Chalasani, L. Wang, R. Roy, N. Simaan, R. H. Taylor, and M. Kobilarov, “Concurrent nonparametric estimation of organ geometry and tissue stiffness using continuous adaptive palpation,” in Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, vol. 2016-June, 2016.
- F. Ferraguti, N. Preda, A. Manurung, M. Bonfe, O. Lambercy, R. Gassert, R. Muradore, P. Fiorini, and C. Secchi, “An Energy Tank-Based Interactive Control Architecture for Autonomous and Teleoperated Robotic Surgery,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 1073–1088, 10 2015.
- J. Zhao, A. Giammarino, E. Lamon, J. Gandarias, E. Momi, and A. Ajoudani, “A Hybrid Learning and Optimization Framework to Achieve Physically Interactive Tasks With Mobile Manipulators,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 7, no. 3, 2022.
- S. Scherzinger, A. Roennau, and R. Dillmann, “Forward Dynamics Compliance Control (FDCC): A new approach to cartesian compliance for robotic manipulators,” IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, vol. 2017-September, pp. 4568–4575, 12 2017.
- L. Beber, E. Lamon, L. Palopoli, L. Fambri, M. Saveriano, and D. Fontanelli, “Elasticity measurements of expanded foams using a collaborative robotic arm,” in 2024 IEEE International Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference (I2MTC), 2024, pp. 1–6.
- H. Ferreau, C. Kirches, A. Potschka, H. Bock, and M. Diehl, “qpOASES: A parametric active-set algorithm for quadratic programming,” Mathematical Programming Computation, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 327–363, 2014.
- A. Haddadi and K. Hashtrudi-Zaad, “Real-time identification of hunt-crossley dynamic models of contact environments,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 555–566, 2012.