Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
169 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

A System-Level Energy-Efficient Digital Twin Framework for Runtime Control of Batch Manufacturing Processes (2309.10151v1)

Published 18 Sep 2023 in eess.SY and cs.SY

Abstract: The manufacturing sector has a substantial influence on worldwide energy consumption. Therefore, improving manufacturing system energy efficiency is becoming increasingly important as the world strives to move toward a more resilient and sustainable energy paradigm. Batch processes are a major contributor to energy consumption in manufacturing systems. In batch manufacturing, a number of parts are grouped together before starting a batch process. To improve the scheduling and control of batch manufacturing processes, we propose a system-level energy-efficient Digital Twin framework that considers Time-of-Use (TOU) energy pricing for runtime decision-making. As part of this framework, we develop a model that combines batch manufacturing process dynamics and TOU-based energy cost. We also provide an optimization-based decision-making algorithm that makes batch scheduling decisions during runtime. A simulated case study showcases the benefits of the proposed framework.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (23)
  1. IEA, “Industry analysis,” 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.iea.org/reports/industry
  2. U.S. Department Of Energy, “Energy efficiency policies and programs,” 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.energy.gov/scep/slsc/energy-efficiency-policies-and-programs
  3. European Commission, “Repowereu: affordable, secure and sustainable energy for Europe,” 2022. [Online]. Available: https://commission.europa.eu/strategy-and-policy
  4. J. W. Fowler and L. Mönch, “A survey of scheduling with parallel batch (p-batch) processing,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 298, no. 1, pp. 1–24, 2022.
  5. C. N. Potts and M. Y. Kovalyov, “Scheduling with batching: A review,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 120, no. 2, pp. 228–249, 2000.
  6. X. Wu, Q. Yuan, and L. Wang, “Multiobjective differential evolution algorithm for solving robotic cell scheduling problem with batch-processing machines,” IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 757–775, 2021.
  7. Z. Zhao, S. Liu, M. Zhou, D. You, and X. Guo, “Heuristic scheduling of batch production processes based on petri nets and iterated greedy algorithms,” IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 251–261, 2022.
  8. C. Eid, E. Koliou, M. Valles, J. Reneses, and R. Hakvoort, “Time-based pricing and electricity demand response: Existing barriers and next steps,” Utilities Policy, vol. 40, pp. 15–25, 2016.
  9. G. Strbac, “Demand side management: Benefits and challenges,” Energy Policy, vol. 36, no. 12, pp. 4419–4426, 2008, foresight Sustainable Energy Management and the Built Environment Project.
  10. S. Sharda, M. Singh, and K. Sharma, “Demand side management through load shifting in iot based hems: Overview, challenges and opportunities,” Sustainable Cities and Society, vol. 65, p. 102517, 2021.
  11. M. Fowlie, C. Wolfram, P. Baylis, C. A. Spurlock, A. Todd-Blick, and P. Cappers, “Default Effects And Follow-On Behaviour: Evidence From An Electricity Pricing Program,” The Review of Economic Studies, vol. 88, no. 6, pp. 2886–2934, 04 2021.
  12. M. Aghelinejad, Y. Ouazene, and A. Yalaoui, “Production scheduling optimisation with machine state and time-dependent energy costs,” International Journal of Production Research, vol. 56, no. 16, pp. 5558–5575, 2018.
  13. M.-J. Park and A. Ham, “Energy-aware flexible job shop scheduling under time-of-use pricing,” International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 248, p. 108507, 2022.
  14. I. H. Sin and B. D. Chung, “Bi-objective optimization approach for energy aware scheduling considering electricity cost and preventive maintenance using genetic algorithm,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 244, p. 118869, 2020.
  15. J. Moyne, Y. Qamsane, E. C. Balta, I. Kovalenko, J. Faris, K. Barton, and D. M. Tilbury, “A requirements driven digital twin framework: Specification and opportunities,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 107 781–107 801, 2020.
  16. I. Kovalenko, J. Moyne, M. Bi, E. C. Balta, W. Ma, Y. Qamsane, X. Zhu, Z. M. Mao, D. M. Tilbury, and K. Barton, “Toward an automated learning control architecture for cyber-physical manufacturing systems,” IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 38 755–38 773, 2022.
  17. Kozhukhov, Yu.V., Marchenko, R. S., Ilyin, I.V., Aksenov, A.A., and Nguyen, Minh Hai, “An architectural approach to process control of gas compressor stations with a low temperature separation gas preparation unit based on a digital twin,” E3S Web Conf., vol. 140, p. 10007, 2019.
  18. A. Barthelmey, E. Lee, R. Hana, and J. Deuse, “Dynamic digital twin for predictive maintenance in flexible production systems,” in IECON 2019 - 45th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, vol. 1, 2019, pp. 4209–4214.
  19. Y. Fang, C. Peng, P. Lou, Z. Zhou, J. Hu, and J. Yan, “Digital-twin-based job shop scheduling toward smart manufacturing,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, vol. 15, no. 12, pp. 6425–6435, 2019.
  20. I. Kovalenko, D. Tilbury, and K. Barton, “Priced timed automata models for control of intelligent product agents in manufacturing systems,” IFAC-PapersOnLine, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 136–142, 2020, 15th IFAC Workshop on Discrete Event Systems WODES 2020 — Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 11-13 November 2020.
  21. I. Kovalenko, E. C. Balta, D. M. Tilbury, and K. Barton, “Cooperative product agents to improve manufacturing system flexibility: A model-based decision framework,” IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 440–457, 2023.
  22. S.-L. Chung, S. Lafortune, and F. Lin, “Limited lookahead policies in supervisory control of discrete event systems,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 37, no. 12, pp. 1921–1935, 1992.
  23. National Grid, “Hourly electric supply charges,” 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www9.nationalgridus.com/niagaramohawk/business/rates/5_hour_charge.asp
Citations (1)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.