Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
41 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
41 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
7 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Generative AI (2309.07930v1)

Published 13 Sep 2023 in cs.AI and cs.LG
Generative AI

Abstract: The term "generative AI" refers to computational techniques that are capable of generating seemingly new, meaningful content such as text, images, or audio from training data. The widespread diffusion of this technology with examples such as Dall-E 2, GPT-4, and Copilot is currently revolutionizing the way we work and communicate with each other. In this article, we provide a conceptualization of generative AI as an entity in socio-technical systems and provide examples of models, systems, and applications. Based on that, we introduce limitations of current generative AI and provide an agenda for Business & Information Systems Engineering (BISE) research. Different from previous works, we focus on generative AI in the context of information systems, and, to this end, we discuss several opportunities and challenges that are unique to the BISE community and make suggestions for impactful directions for BISE research.

Insights on "Generative AI"

The paper "Generative AI" offers a comprehensive exploration of generative artificial intelligence, delineating its conceptual framework, limitations, and potential implications for the Business Information Systems Engineering (BISE) community. The authors, Feuerriegel, Hartmann, Janiesch, and Zschech, provide a multidimensional analysis of generative AI as an integral entity within socio-technical systems and propose avenues for future research within the BISE domain.

Conceptual Framework and Technical Foundations

Generative AI is defined as computational techniques capable of synthesizing new content - text, images, or audio - from existing data. The authors give a detailed account of the mathematical principles underpinning generative AI, highlighting generative modeling's distinct modus operandi from discriminative modeling. The paper underscores the centrality of deep neural networks, including architectures like transformers and diffusion probabilistic models, in implementing generative systems. The authors provide an in-depth look at various generative models, such as GANs and LLMs like GPT, illuminating their roles in generating multimodal outputs.

The paper introduces three levels of perspectives on generative AI: model, system, and application. On the model level, the authors describe how AI learns implicit and sometimes emergent behaviors for diverse applications. They discuss how foundation models function as universal, adaptable models across application domains. System-level considerations encompass infrastructure, scalability, and user interfaces for deploying generative models effectively. Application-level analysis spans business problems, artistic content creation, and decision support, underscoring the relevance of generative AI in automating and enhancing creative and mundane tasks alike.

Limitations and Challenges

Generative AI, despite its innovative capabilities, presents several limitations. The paper identifies issues such as incorrect outputs or "hallucinations," inherent biases, unfamiliarity with current events, and environmental concerns posed by resource-intensive model training. Such challenges necessitate a multifaceted approach to refine techniques and propose systematic mitigations. For example, bias in training data can propagate fairness issues in generated content, and reinforcement learning mechanisms need to balance human annotations for better outcomes. Furthermore, the closed-source nature of some commercially available generative AI systems restricts transparency.

Implications for BISE and Future Directions

The exploration poses critical implications for the BISE community, offering reflective insights and research possibilities for distinct BISE departments:

  • Business Process Management: Generative AI presents opportunities to innovate process design and automate routine workflows, necessitating exploration into how AI can reveal process innovation and support re-design initiatives.
  • Decision Analytics and Data Science: New research can focus on effective fine-tuning of models for domain specialization and reliability improvements, addressing the issue of hallucinations and biased outputs.
  • Digital Business Management and Leadership: There's an evident shift in digital work paradigms driven by AI, encouraging research into AI's role in management practices and its implications on intra-organizational structures.
  • Enterprise Modeling and Engineering: Potentially redefining traditional modeling methodologies, generative AI supports dynamic model generation and application development, with applications in creating enterprise models and system integration.
  • Human-Computer Interaction and Social Computing: Generative AI interfaces can improve system usability and accessibility, impacting user interaction design and communication in digital spheres, while educational domain reforms could leverage AI for personalized learning experiences.
  • Information Systems Engineering and Technology: Escape the technical challenges of generative AI by developing socio-technical design principles and frameworks. The focus should be on interpretability, and reliability, and addressing environmental considerations.

The evolution of generative AI holds significant transformative potential for industries reliant on automation, creativity, and knowledge-based workflows. The authors conclude by emphasizing the need for holistic paper and thoughtful integration of generative AI to harness its potential responsibly while addressing its inherent limitations. Such considerations will ensure that the BISE community not only adapts to these technological advances but actively shapes their trajectory within enterprise environments.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (4)
  1. Stefan Feuerriegel (117 papers)
  2. Jochen Hartmann (5 papers)
  3. Christian Janiesch (13 papers)
  4. Patrick Zschech (19 papers)
Citations (303)