Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
117 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
8 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
47 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
5 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Elementary Proofs of Congruences for POND and PEND Partitions (2308.09999v1)

Published 19 Aug 2023 in math.NT

Abstract: Recently, Ballantine and Welch considered various generalizations and refinements of POD and PED partitions. These are integer partitions wherein the odd parts must be distinct (in the case of POD partitions) or the even parts must be distinct (in the case of PED partitions). In the process, they were led to consider two classes of integer partitions which are, in some sense, the ``opposite'' of POD and PED partitions. They labeled these POND and PEND partitions, which are integer partitions wherein the odd parts cannot be distinct (in the case of POND partitions) or the even parts cannot be distinct (in the case of PEND partitions). In this work, we study these two types of partitions from an arithmetic perspective. Along the way, we are led to prove the following two infinite families of Ramanujan--like congruences: For all $\alpha \geq 1$ and all $n\geq 0,$ \begin{align*} pond\left(3{2\alpha +1}n+\frac{23\cdot 3{2\alpha}+1}{8}\right) &\equiv 0 \pmod{3}, \textrm{\ \ \ and} \ pend\left(3{2\alpha +1}n+\frac{17\cdot 3{2\alpha}-1}{8}\right) &\equiv 0 \pmod{3} \end{align*} where $pond(n)$ counts the number of POND partitions of weight $n$ and $pend(n)$ counts the number of PEND partitions of weight $n$. All of the proof techniques used herein are elementary, relying on classical $q$-series identities and generating function manipulations, along with mathematical induction.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.