Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
156 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Descriptive complexity for neural networks via Boolean networks (2308.06277v2)

Published 1 Aug 2023 in cs.CC and cs.LO

Abstract: We investigate the descriptive complexity of a class of neural networks with unrestricted topologies and piecewise polynomial activation functions. We consider the general scenario where the running time is unlimited and floating-point numbers are used for simulating reals. We characterize these neural networks with a rule-based logic for Boolean networks. In particular, we show that the sizes of the neural networks and the corresponding Boolean rule formulae are polynomially related. In fact, in the direction from Boolean rules to neural networks, the blow-up is only linear. We also analyze the delays in running times due to the translations. In the translation from neural networks to Boolean rules, the time delay is polylogarithmic in the neural network size and linear in time. In the converse translation, the time delay is linear in both factors. We also obtain translations between the rule-based logic for Boolean networks, the diamond-free fragment of modal substitution calculus and a class of recursive Boolean circuits where the number of input and output gates match.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (15)
  1. Descriptive complexity for distributed computing with circuits. In Jérôme Leroux, Sylvain Lombardy, and David Peleg, editors, 48th International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science, MFCS 2023, August 28 to September 1, 2023, Bordeaux, France, volume 272 of LIPIcs, pages 9:1–9:15. Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik, 2023. URL: https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.MFCS.2023.9, doi:10.4230/LIPICS.MFCS.2023.9.
  2. The logical expressiveness of graph neural networks. In 8th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2020, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, April 26-30, 2020. OpenReview.net, 2020.
  3. Size-depth tradeoffs for boolean formulae. Information Processing Letters, 49(3):151–155, 1994. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0020019094900930, doi:10.1016/0020-0190(94)90093-0.
  4. A linear representation of dynamics of boolean networks. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 55(10):2251–2258, 2010.
  5. Martin Grohe. The logic of graph neural networks. In 36th Annual ACM/IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science, LICS 2021, Rome, Italy, June 29 - July 2, 2021, pages 1–17. IEEE, 2021.
  6. Martin Grohe. The descriptive complexity of graph neural networks, 2023. arXiv:2303.04613.
  7. Weak models of distributed computing, with connections to modal logic. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Symposium on Principles of distributed computing, pages 185–194, 2012.
  8. Weak models of distributed computing, with connections to modal logic. Distributed Comput., 28(1):31–53, 2015.
  9. Stuart Kauffman. Homeostasis and differentiation in random genetic control networks. Nature, 224(5215):177–178, 1969.
  10. Antti Kuusisto. Modal Logic and Distributed Message Passing Automata. In Computer Science Logic 2013 (CSL 2013), volume 23 of Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), pages 452–468, 2013.
  11. Leonid Libkin. Elements of Finite Model Theory. Texts in Theoretical Computer Science. An EATCS Series. Springer, 2004.
  12. Fabian Reiter. Asynchronous distributed automata: A characterization of the modal mu-fragment. In Ioannis Chatzigiannakis, Piotr Indyk, Fabian Kuhn, and Anca Muscholl, editors, 44th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming, ICALP 2017, July 10-14, 2017, Warsaw, Poland, volume 80 of LIPIcs, pages 100:1–100:14, 2017.
  13. Concepts in boolean network modeling: What do they all mean? Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 18:571–582, 2020.
  14. Boolean networks for cryptography and secure communication. Nonlinear Science Letters B: Chaos, Fractal and Synchronization. Vol, 1(1):27–34, 2011.
  15. Network model of survival signaling in large granular lymphocyte leukemia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(42):16308–16313, 2008.
Citations (1)

Summary

  • The paper formulates Boolean network logic to relate neural network sizes with Boolean rule formulae through polynomial transformations and linear blow-up bounds.
  • It demonstrates efficient two-way translations: neural networks convert to Boolean representations in polylogarithmic time, while the reverse process is polynomially bounded.
  • The research bridges computational logic and neural models, offering actionable insights for algorithm design, hardware performance, and transparent AI diagnostics.

Descriptive Complexity for Neural Networks via Boolean Networks

The paper entitled "Descriptive complexity for neural networks via Boolean networks" by Veeti Ahvonen, Damian Heiman, and Antti Kuusisto investigates the descriptive complexity of neural networks through the lens of Boolean network logic (BNL). The work offers a logical characterisation of a broad class of neural networks, primarily focusing on networks with unrestricted topologies and piecewise polynomial activation functions. Here, the discretisation and Boolean transformations form the core analytical constructs. This essay will summarise the key contributions, strong numerical results, and implications of this research, both theoretical and practical, and posit on the future directions for Neural Networks (NN) and AI.

Overview and Contributions

The research pursues a comprehensive characterisation of neural networks using rule-based logic typical in Boolean networks. It demonstrates how the sizes of neural networks and their corresponding Boolean rule formulae are polynomially related, noting that the blow-up from Boolean rules to neural networks is merely linear. Conversely, translating from neural networks to Boolean rules induces a polylogarithmic time delay relative to the neural network size and linearly dependent on time, offering robust scalability.

Key contributions include:

  1. Formulation of Boolean Network Logic (BNL): The authors extend typical Boolean networks to BNL, including terminal clauses and characterising various computational settings.
  2. Polynomial Translations: Establish polynomial relations between NN sizes and BNL program sizes, showing both directions of translations.
  3. Descriptive Analogues: Corroborate BNL's correlation with the diamond-free fragment of modal substitution calculus (SC) and self-feeding circuits. This contributes to understanding how traditional fixed-point logics can be substituted into neural network-based computations, drawing an accessible bridge between discrete computational theories and continuous neural paradigms.

Numerical Results and Verification

Translation Efficiency:

  • Given a neural network NN in a floating-point system S(p,q,β)S(p, q, \beta) with nodes NN, degree Δ\Delta, piece-size PP, and order Ω\Omega, its corresponding BNL program Λ\Lambda has size: O(N(Δ+PΩ2)(r4+r3β2+rβ4))O(N (\Delta + P \Omega^{2}) (r^{4} + r^{3} \beta^{2} + r \beta^{4})), where r=max{p,q}r = \max \{p, q\}.
  • Time complexity for Λ\Lambda to simulate NN is O((log(Ω)+1)(log(r)+log(β))+log(Δ))O((\log(\Omega) + 1)(\log(r) + \log(\beta)) + \log(\Delta)).

Reversals from BNL to NNs:

  • The conversion from a BNL program Λ\Lambda comprising size ss and depth dd to a general neural network NN guarantees a polynomial relationship in both size and time. Specifically, producing NN:
    • Size: ≤ ss,
    • Degree: ≤ 2,
    • Activation function: ReLU(x)=max{0,x}\mathrm{ReLU} (x) = \max\{0, x\}.

Implications and Future Work

Theoretical Impact:

  • Boundaries of Logic and Learnability: The blend of logic-based and non-symbolic methods reaffirms that symbolic representations play a crucial underpinning in understanding the capacities and limits of neural networks. The theoretical contacts established between BNL and NN models encompass application to recursively enumerable languages through finite and non-finite input spaces.
  • Randomisation and Extensions: Enhancing these networks to support randomness and other arithmetic forms like fixed-point computing could foster new insights and abstract capabilities inclusive of AI learning dynamics.

Practical Relevance:

  • Performance Metrics: Knowing bounds on translation delays and fixed time overheads has practical implications in hardware advances, directly influencing how neural processors like TPUs (Tensor Processing Units) are designed.
  • Algorithmic Insights: The polynomial bounds direct efforts towards constructing effective algorithms that leverage the logic-awareness of our models, possibly purifying iteration methodologies in context-heavy neural evaluations such as visual arts or complex linguistic assessments.

Speculations on AI:

  • Advanced Diagnoses and Interpretability: The ability to revert neural expressions to Boolean logic paves the way for more transparent, interpretable, AI tools with built-in diagnostic capacities, possibly aiding fields like healthcare, finance, or autonomous systems.
  • Ethical AI: Logical underpinnings ensure a stronger ethical frontend, with controllable, verifiable AI actions. Comprehension of these networks through BNL and logical calculi pronounces a step towards mitigated bias and reproducible fairness in decision-making models.

Conclusion

By exploring the descriptive complexity of neural networks via Boolean networks, the researchers elucidate a significant relationship between different computational models. The synthesis of logic-based and neural frameworks underscores the comprehensive adaptability of neural networks, setting trajectories for future advancements in computational logic and artificial intelligence. This interdisciplinary approach accentuates both practical and theoretical angles, poised to influence forthcoming innovations in AI research and application.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com