Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
102 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Semantic-SAM: Segment and Recognize Anything at Any Granularity (2307.04767v1)

Published 10 Jul 2023 in cs.CV

Abstract: In this paper, we introduce Semantic-SAM, a universal image segmentation model to enable segment and recognize anything at any desired granularity. Our model offers two key advantages: semantic-awareness and granularity-abundance. To achieve semantic-awareness, we consolidate multiple datasets across three granularities and introduce decoupled classification for objects and parts. This allows our model to capture rich semantic information. For the multi-granularity capability, we propose a multi-choice learning scheme during training, enabling each click to generate masks at multiple levels that correspond to multiple ground-truth masks. Notably, this work represents the first attempt to jointly train a model on SA-1B, generic, and part segmentation datasets. Experimental results and visualizations demonstrate that our model successfully achieves semantic-awareness and granularity-abundance. Furthermore, combining SA-1B training with other segmentation tasks, such as panoptic and part segmentation, leads to performance improvements. We will provide code and a demo for further exploration and evaluation.

Semantic-SAM: Segment and Recognize Anything at Any Granularity

The paper "Semantic-SAM: Segment and Recognize Anything at Any Granularity" presents a universal model for image segmentation aimed at versatile and comprehensive recognition capabilities. The authors introduce Semantic-SAM, a model designed to recognize semantic features across various levels of granularity within images, thereby addressing multiple segmentation tasks simultaneously. This solution leverages a combination of existing datasets, multi-choice learning techniques, and advanced model architectures to enhance image segmentation efficacy.

Model Architecture and Training Paradigm

The Semantic-SAM model introduces a flexible architecture by employing a query-based mask decoder, similar to methods in the Mask DINO framework. This design allows it to handle varied inputs such as points and bounding boxes, thus supporting a multitude of segmentation scenarios. Notably, this is achieved through multi-choice learning and a many-to-many matching strategy, which enable the model to produce segmented outputs at different granularity levels from a single input. Unlike traditional single-output pipelines that limit granularity prediction, this architecture enhances the model’s ability to discern and delineate intricate object-part relationships.

Training Semantic-SAM involves integrating multiple datasets that provide annotations at different semantic and granularity levels. The training process is strategically structured to foster semantic awareness and granularity abundance, incorporating data from well-known datasets such as MSCOCO, ADE20k, and newly developed resources like SA-1B. By fusing object-level and part-level datasets with interactive segmentation datasets, the training approach not only enriches semantic richness but also improves the model’s adaptability to diverse visual environments. Decoupled classification techniques further refine the model’s capacity for detecting and classifying objects and parts distinctly, an approach that facilitates detailed semantic understanding across varied segmentation tasks.

Experimental Validation

Experimental evaluation on datasets such as COCO Val2017 indicates marked improvements in segmentation performance. The Semantic-SAM model, when assessed alongside previous models like Mask2Former and OpenSeed, demonstrated enhanced performance, particularly when trained jointly on segmentation-specific datasets along with SA-1B. Noteworthily, the model's performance gains were more pronounced on tasks involving smaller objects, reflecting the model's effectiveness at capturing finer granularity details.

In the context of multi-granularity interactive segmentation, Semantic-SAM outperformed existing frameworks by producing higher quality masks with more diverse granularity levels. The novel many-to-many matching strategy used in training crucially contributed to this performance, allowing the model to effectively manage the ambiguity associated with varied semantic granularity.

Practical and Theoretical Implications

Semantic-SAM represents a distinct step towards developing universal segmentation models capable of addressing a wide spectrum of segmentation tasks without sacrificing granularity or semantic detail. This advancement is significant for practical applications in areas such as autonomous systems, medical imaging, and any domain requiring detailed object-part recognition and segmentation.

Theoretically, this work underscores the potential of multi-choice learning schemes and data unification strategies in developing robust segmentation models. The approach could be extended to other vision tasks, potentially advancing models which require an overview of multiple data inputs and varied classification tasks.

Future Trajectories

As models like Semantic-SAM continue to evolve, future research might explore the integration of additional real-world datasets to improve model generalization and robustness in diverse environments. Advances in interactive segmentation techniques, incorporating user feedback and dynamic input adaptations, could also further refine model output precision.

The potential symbiosis with other emerging technologies, such as vision-LLMs, presents another frontier. Incorporating semantic understanding that integrates textual descriptions alongside visual data could usher in a new era of segmentation models capable of operating in more complex semantic spaces.

Overall, Semantic-SAM stands as a testament to the capacity for blending advanced architectural strategies with expansive training datasets to address the multifaceted challenges of semantic image segmentation.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (71)
  1. Contour detection and hierarchical image segmentation. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 33(5):898–916, 2010.
  2. Multiscale combinatorial grouping. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 328–335, 2014.
  3. Yolact: Real-time instance segmentation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 9157–9166, 2019.
  4. End-to-end object detection with transformers. In European Conference on Computer Vision, pages 213–229. Springer, 2020.
  5. Emerging properties in self-supervised vision transformers. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, pages 9650–9660, 2021.
  6. Deeplab: Semantic image segmentation with deep convolutional nets, atrous convolution, and fully connected crfs. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 40(4):834–848, 2017.
  7. Rethinking atrous convolution for semantic image segmentation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1706.05587, 2017.
  8. Microsoft COCO captions: Data collection and evaluation server. arXiv preprint arXiv:1504.00325, 2015.
  9. Detect what you can: Detecting and representing objects using holistic models and body parts, 2014.
  10. Focalclick: towards practical interactive image segmentation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 1300–1309, 2022.
  11. Masked-attention mask transformer for universal image segmentation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 1290–1299, 2022.
  12. The cityscapes dataset for semantic urban scene understanding. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 3213–3223, 2016.
  13. Part-aware panoptic segmentation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 5485–5494, 2021.
  14. Open-vocabulary panoptic segmentation with maskclip. arXiv preprint arXiv:2208.08984, 2022.
  15. The pascal visual object classes challenge 2012 (voc2012) development kit. Pattern Analysis, Statistical Modelling and Computational Learning, Tech. Rep, 8(5), 2011.
  16. Object detection with discriminatively trained part-based models. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 32(9):1627–1645, 2009.
  17. A survey on image segmentation. Pattern recognition, 13(1):3–16, 1981.
  18. Open-vocabulary image segmentation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.12143, 2021.
  19. Leo Grady. Random walks for image segmentation. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 28(11):1768–1783, 2006.
  20. Efficient hierarchical graph-based video segmentation. In 2010 ieee computer society conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 2141–2148. IEEE, 2010.
  21. Lvis: A dataset for large vocabulary instance segmentation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 5356–5364, 2019.
  22. Multiple choice learning: Learning to produce multiple structured outputs. Advances in neural information processing systems, 25, 2012.
  23. Partimagenet: A large, high-quality dataset of parts. arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.00933, 2021.
  24. Mask r-cnn. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision, pages 2961–2969, 2017.
  25. Multi-task fusion for efficient panoptic-part segmentation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.07671, 2022.
  26. Oneformer: One transformer to rule universal image segmentation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.06220, 2022.
  27. Learning semantic neural tree for human parsing. In Computer Vision–ECCV 2020: 16th European Conference, Glasgow, UK, August 23–28, 2020, Proceedings, Part XIII 16, pages 205–221. Springer, 2020.
  28. Scaling up visual and vision-language representation learning with noisy text supervision. In ICML, 2021.
  29. Fashionpedia: Ontology, segmentation, and an attribute localization dataset. In Computer Vision–ECCV 2020: 16th European Conference, Glasgow, UK, August 23–28, 2020, Proceedings, Part I 16, pages 316–332. Springer, 2020.
  30. Panoptic segmentation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 9404–9413, 2019.
  31. Segment anything, 2023.
  32. Language-driven semantic segmentation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2201.03546, 2022.
  33. Mask dino: Towards a unified transformer-based framework for object detection and segmentation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.02777, 2022.
  34. Holistic, instance-level human parsing. arXiv preprint arXiv:1709.03612, 2017.
  35. Panoptic-partformer: Learning a unified model for panoptic part segmentation. In European Conference on Computer Vision, pages 729–747. Springer, 2022.
  36. Lazy snapping. ACM Transactions on Graphics (ToG), 23(3):303–308, 2004.
  37. Interactive image segmentation with latent diversity. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 577–585, 2018.
  38. Panoptic segformer: Delving deeper into panoptic segmentation with transformers. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 1280–1289, 2022.
  39. Microsoft coco: Common objects in context. In ECCV, 2014.
  40. Simpleclick: Interactive image segmentation with simple vision transformers. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.11006, 2022.
  41. Swin transformer: Hierarchical vision transformer using shifted windows. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 10012–10022, 2021.
  42. Fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 3431–3440, 2015.
  43. Decoupled weight decay regularization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.05101, 2017.
  44. Cityscapes-panoptic-parts and pascal-panoptic-parts datasets for scene understanding. arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.07944, 2020.
  45. Image segmentation using deep learning: A survey. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 2021.
  46. OpenAI. Chatgpt. https://openai.com/blog/chatgpt, 2022.
  47. OpenAI. Gpt-4 technical report, 2023.
  48. Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 8748–8763. PMLR, 2021.
  49. PACO: Parts and attributes of common objects. In arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.01795, 2023.
  50. Denseclip: Language-guided dense prediction with context-aware prompting. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 18082–18091, 2022.
  51. Faster r-cnn: Towards real-time object detection with region proposal networks. Advances in neural information processing systems, 28:91–99.
  52. High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 10684–10695, 2022.
  53. Objects365: A large-scale, high-quality dataset for object detection. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, pages 8430–8439, 2019.
  54. Apollocar3d: A large 3d car instance understanding benchmark for autonomous driving. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 5452–5462, 2019.
  55. Going denser with open-vocabulary part segmentation, 2023.
  56. Attention is all you need. Advances in neural information processing systems, 30, 2017.
  57. The caltech-ucsd birds-200-2011 dataset. technical report, 2011.
  58. Seggpt: Segmenting everything in context. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.03284, 2023.
  59. Groupvit: Semantic segmentation emerges from text supervision. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 18134–18144, 2022.
  60. Open-vocabulary panoptic segmentation with text-to-image diffusion models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.04803, 2023.
  61. Deep interactive object selection. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 373–381, 2016.
  62. Unified contrastive learning in image-text-label space. In CVPR, 2022.
  63. Parsing r-cnn for instance-level human analysis. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 364–373, 2019.
  64. Mp-former: Mask-piloted transformer for image segmentation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.07336, 2023.
  65. A simple framework for open-vocabulary segmentation and detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.08131, 2023.
  66. Adding conditional control to text-to-image diffusion models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.05543, 2023.
  67. Scene parsing through ade20k dataset. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 633–641, 2017.
  68. Semantic understanding of scenes through the ade20k dataset, 2018.
  69. Generalized decoding for pixel, image, and language. arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.11270, 2022.
  70. Segment everything everywhere all at once. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.06718, 2023.
  71. Object detection in 20 years: A survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:1905.05055, 2019.
User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (9)
  1. Feng Li (286 papers)
  2. Hao Zhang (948 papers)
  3. Peize Sun (33 papers)
  4. Xueyan Zou (21 papers)
  5. Shilong Liu (60 papers)
  6. Jianwei Yang (93 papers)
  7. Chunyuan Li (122 papers)
  8. Lei Zhang (1689 papers)
  9. Jianfeng Gao (344 papers)
Citations (138)
X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com