Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
158 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

TEASER: Simulation-based CAN Bus Regression Testing for Self-driving Cars Software (2307.03279v1)

Published 6 Jul 2023 in cs.SE

Abstract: Software systems for safety-critical systems like self-driving cars (SDCs) need to be tested rigorously. Especially electronic control units (ECUs) of SDCs should be tested with realistic input data. In this context, a communication protocol called Controller Area Network (CAN) is typically used to transfer sensor data to the SDC control units. A challenge for SDC maintainers and testers is the need to manually define the CAN inputs that realistically represent the state of the SDC in the real world. To address this challenge, we developed TEASER, which is a tool that generates realistic CAN signals for SDCs obtained from sensors from state-of-the-art car simulators. We evaluated TEASER based on its integration capability into a DevOps pipeline of aicas GmbH, a company in the automotive sector. Concretely, we integrated TEASER in a Continous Integration (CI) pipeline configured with Jenkins. The pipeline executes the test cases in simulation environments and sends the sensor data over the CAN bus to a physical CAN device, which is the test subject. Our evaluation shows the ability of TEASER to generate and execute CI test cases that expose simulation-based faults (using regression strategies); the tool produces CAN inputs that realistically represent the state of the SDC in the real world. This result is of critical importance for increasing automation and effectiveness of simulation-based CAN bus regression testing for SDC software. Tool: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7964890 GitHub: https://github.com/christianbirchler-org/sdc-scissor/releases/tag/v2.2.0-rc.1 Documentation: https://sdc-scissor.readthedocs.io

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (20)
  1. N. H. T. S. Administration, “Summary report: Standing general order on crash reporting for level 2 advanced driver assistance systems,” National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, D.C. 20590, Tech. Rep. DOT HS 813 325, June 2022.
  2. NPR, “Nearly 400 car crashes in 11 months involved automated tech, companies tell regulators,” npr.org. [Online]. Available: https://www.npr.org/2022/06/15/1105252793/nearly-400-car-crashes-in-11-months-involved-automated-tech-companies-tell-regul
  3. 9News Staff, “Warning for drivers using autopilot after melbourne crash that critically injured woman,” 9news.com.au. [Online]. Available: https://www.9news.com.au/national/tesla-autopilot-driving-warning-following-melbourne-armadale-car-crash/e2fd7193-d8e7-490d-a225-f568a1dc4223
  4. S. Khatiri, S. Panichella, and P. Tonella, “Simulation-based test case generation for unmanned aerial vehicles in the neighborhood of real flights,” in Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation.   IEEE, 2023, pp. 281–292. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICST57152.2023.00034
  5. A. Di Sorbo, F. Zampetti, A. Visaggio, M. Di Penta, and S. Panichella, “Automated identification and qualitative characterization of safety concerns reported in uav software platforms,” vol. 32, no. 3, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/3564821
  6. CAN in Automation (CiA), “History of can technology,” can-cia.org. [Online]. Available: https://www.can-cia.org/can-knowledge/can/can-history/
  7. T. Huang, J. Zhou, and A. Bytes, “ATG: an attack traffic generation tool for security testing of in-vehicle CAN bus,” in International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security.   ACM, 2018, pp. 32:1–32:6. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/3230833.3230843
  8. S. Yang, D. Tang, and X. Shi, “Testing system for CAN bus-oriented embedded software,” in International Conference on Computer and Information Science.   IEEE Computer Society, 2014, pp. 379–384. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIS.2014.6912162
  9. O. Cros, A. Thiroux, and G. Chênevert, “Cacao, a can-bus simulation platform for secured vehicular communication,” in Ad Hoc Networks - International Conference, ADHOCNETS, ser. Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering, vol. 345.   Springer, 2020, pp. 213–224. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67369-7_16
  10. M. Bozdal, M. Samie, and I. Jennions, “A survey on can bus protocol: Attacks, challenges, and potential solutions,” in International Conference on Computing, Electronics & Communications Engineering, 2018, pp. 201–205. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/iCCECOME.2018.8658720
  11. J. Zhang and T. Li, “Based on the queuing model of CAN bus simulation and application,” in International Conference on Bio-Inspired Computing: Theories and Applications, ser. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 212.   Springer, 2013, pp. 631–639. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37502-6_76
  12. Y. Vershinin, B. Nnadiekwe, and S. Schulz, “Simulation of signal transmission in motion simulator using controller area network (can-bus),” in International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems.   IEEE, 2015, pp. 2688–2693. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/ITSC.2015.432
  13. R. Louali, S. Bouaziz, A. Elouardi, and M. Abouzahir, “Platform simulation based unmanned aircraft systems design,” in Second World Conference on Complex Systems, 2014, pp. 736–742. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICoCS.2014.7061002
  14. C. Liu and F. Luo, “A co-simulation-and-test method for CAN bus system,” J. Commun., vol. 8, no. 10, pp. 681–689, 2013. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.12720/jcm.8.10.681-689
  15. C. Birchler, N. Ganz, S. Khatiri, A. Gambi, and S. Panichella, “Cost-effective simulation-based test selection in self-driving cars software with sdc-scissor,” in International Conference on Software Analysis, Evolution and Reengineering.   IEEE, 2022, pp. 164–168. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/SANER53432.2022.00030
  16. International Workshop on Search-Based Software Testing.   IEEE, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/conhome/9810653/proceeding
  17. International Workshop on Search-Based Software Testing.   IEEE, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/SBST52555.2021
  18. C. Birchler, S. Khatiri, B. Bosshard, A. Gambi, and S. Panichella, “Machine learning-based test selection for simulation-based testing of self-driving cars software,” Empirical Software Engineering, vol. 28, no. 3, p. 71, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-023-10286-y
  19. C. Birchler, S. Khatiri, P. Derakhshanfar, S. Panichella, and A. Panichella, “Single and multi-objective test cases prioritization for self-driving cars in virtual environments,” ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol., vol. 32, no. 2, apr 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/3533818
  20. C. Berger, “Accelerating regression testing for scaled self-driving cars with lightweight virtualization – a case study,” in International Workshop on Software Engineering for Smart Cyber-Physical Systems, 2015, pp. 2–7. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/SEsCPS.2015.9
Citations (1)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.