Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
139 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
46 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Reconfiguration of Polygonal Subdivisions via Recombination (2307.00704v1)

Published 3 Jul 2023 in cs.CG

Abstract: Motivated by the problem of redistricting, we study area-preserving reconfigurations of connected subdivisions of a simple polygon. A connected subdivision of a polygon $\mathcal{R}$, called a district map, is a set of interior disjoint connected polygons called districts whose union equals $\mathcal{R}$. We consider the recombination as the reconfiguration move which takes a subdivision and produces another by merging two adjacent districts, and by splitting them into two connected polygons of the same area as the original districts. The complexity of a map is the number of vertices in the boundaries of its districts. Given two maps with $k$ districts, with complexity $O(n)$, and a perfect matching between districts of the same area in the two maps, we show constructively that $(\log n){O(\log k)}$ recombination moves are sufficient to reconfigure one into the other. We also show that $\Omega(\log n)$ recombination moves are sometimes necessary even when $k=3$, thus providing a tight bound when $k=O(1)$.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (24)
  1. Recognizing weakly simple polygons. Discrete & Computational Geometry, 58(4):785–821, 2017.
  2. Reconfiguration of connected graph partitions. Journal of Graph Theory, 2022. doi:10.1002/jgt.22856.
  3. Reconfiguration of connected graph partitions via recombination. Theoretical Computer Science, 923:13–26, 2022. doi:10.1016/j.tcs.2022.04.049.
  4. Multi-scale merge-split Markov chain Monte Carlo for redistricting, 2020. arXiv:2008.08054.
  5. Synchronized planarity with applications to constrained planarity problems. In Proc. 29th European Symposium on Algorithms (ESA), volume 204 of LIPIcs, pages 19:1–19:14. Schloss Dagstuhl, 2021. doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.ESA.2021.19.
  6. Spanning tree methods for sampling graph partitions, 2022. arXiv:2210.01401.
  7. Detecting weakly simple polygons. In Proc. 26th ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA), pages 1655–1670, 2014. doi:10.1137/1.9781611973730.110.
  8. Unintentional gerrymandering: Political geography and electoral bias in legislatures. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 8(3):239–269, 2013. doi:10.1561/100.00012033.
  9. Cutting through the thicket: Redistricting simulations and the detection of partisan gerrymanders. Election Law Journal, 14(4):331–345, 2015. doi:10.1089/elj.2015.0317.
  10. Assessing significance in a Markov chain without mixing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(11):2860–2864, 2017. doi:10.1073/pnas.16175401.
  11. Balanced centroidal power diagrams for redistricting. In Proc. 26th ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems, pages 389–396, 2018.
  12. On embedding a cycle in a plane graph. Discrete Mathematics, 309(7):1856–1869, 2009. doi:10.1016/j.disc.2007.12.090.
  13. Redistricting reform in Virginia: Districting criteria in context. Virginia Policy Review, 2019.
  14. Recombination: A family of Markov chains for redistricting. Harvard Data Science Review, 3 2021. https://hdsr.mitpress.mit.edu/pub/1ds8ptxu. doi:10.1162/99608f92.eb30390f.
  15. Moon Duchin. Gerrymandering metrics: How to measure? What’s the baseline? Bulletin of the American Academy for Arts and Sciences, LXII(2):54–58, 2018.
  16. Automated redistricting simulation using Markov chain Monte Carlo. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 29(4):715–728, 2020. doi:10.1080/10618600.2020.1739532.
  17. Atomic embeddability, clustered planarity, and thickenability. J. ACM, 69(2):13:1–13:34, 2022. doi:10.1145/3502264.
  18. Quantifying gerrymandering in north carolina. Statistics and Public Policy, 7(1):30–38, 2020. doi:10.1080/2330443X.2020.1796400.
  19. Evaluating partisan gerrymandering in Wisconsin. Technical report, 2017. arXiv:1709.01596.
  20. Camille Jordan. Sur les assemblages des lignes. Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik, 70:185–190, 1869.
  21. A separator theorem for planar graphs. SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, 36(2):177–189, 1979. doi:10.1137/0136016.
  22. Redistricting and the will of the people, 2014. arXiv:1410.8796.
  23. Separators for sphere-packings and nearest neighbor graphs. J. ACM, 44(1):1–29, 1997. doi:10.1145/256292.256294.
  24. Complexity and geometry of sampling connected graph partitions, 2019. arXiv:1908.08881.
Citations (1)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.