Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
133 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
46 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

TopicFM+: Boosting Accuracy and Efficiency of Topic-Assisted Feature Matching (2307.00485v1)

Published 2 Jul 2023 in cs.CV

Abstract: This study tackles the challenge of image matching in difficult scenarios, such as scenes with significant variations or limited texture, with a strong emphasis on computational efficiency. Previous studies have attempted to address this challenge by encoding global scene contexts using Transformers. However, these approaches suffer from high computational costs and may not capture sufficient high-level contextual information, such as structural shapes or semantic instances. Consequently, the encoded features may lack discriminative power in challenging scenes. To overcome these limitations, we propose a novel image-matching method that leverages a topic-modeling strategy to capture high-level contexts in images. Our method represents each image as a multinomial distribution over topics, where each topic represents a latent semantic instance. By incorporating these topics, we can effectively capture comprehensive context information and obtain discriminative and high-quality features. Additionally, our method effectively matches features within corresponding semantic regions by estimating the covisible topics. To enhance the efficiency of feature matching, we have designed a network with a pooling-and-merging attention module. This module reduces computation by employing attention only on fixed-sized topics and small-sized features. Through extensive experiments, we have demonstrated the superiority of our method in challenging scenarios. Specifically, our method significantly reduces computational costs while maintaining higher image-matching accuracy compared to state-of-the-art methods. The code will be updated soon at https://github.com/TruongKhang/TopicFM

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (69)
  1. J. L. Schonberger and J.-M. Frahm, “Structure-from-motion revisited,” in Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2016, pp. 4104–4113.
  2. S. Zhu, R. Zhang, L. Zhou, T. Shen, T. Fang, P. Tan, and L. Quan, “Very large-scale global sfm by distributed motion averaging,” in Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2018, pp. 4568–4577.
  3. R. Mur-Artal, J. M. M. Montiel, and J. D. Tardos, “Orb-slam: a versatile and accurate monocular slam system,” IEEE transactions on robotics, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 1147–1163, 2015.
  4. C. Campos, R. Elvira, J. J. G. Rodríguez, J. M. Montiel, and J. D. Tardós, “Orb-slam3: An accurate open-source library for visual, visual–inertial, and multimap slam,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 1874–1890, 2021.
  5. C. Tomasi and T. K. Detection, “Tracking of point features,” Int. J. Comput. Vis, vol. 9, pp. 137–154, 1991.
  6. J. Shi et al., “Good features to track,” in 1994 Proceedings of IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition.   IEEE, 1994, pp. 593–600.
  7. P.-E. Sarlin, C. Cadena, R. Siegwart, and M. Dymczyk, “From coarse to fine: Robust hierarchical localization at large scale,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2019, pp. 12 716–12 725.
  8. S. Lynen, B. Zeisl, D. Aiger, M. Bosse, J. Hesch, M. Pollefeys, R. Siegwart, and T. Sattler, “Large-scale, real-time visual–inertial localization revisited,” The International Journal of Robotics Research, vol. 39, no. 9, pp. 1061–1084, 2020.
  9. D. G. Lowe, “Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints,” International journal of computer vision, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 91–110, 2004.
  10. H. Bay, A. Ess, T. Tuytelaars, and L. Van Gool, “Speeded-up robust features (surf),” Computer vision and image understanding, vol. 110, no. 3, pp. 346–359, 2008.
  11. M. Calonder, V. Lepetit, M. Ozuysal, T. Trzcinski, C. Strecha, and P. Fua, “Brief: Computing a local binary descriptor very fast,” IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, vol. 34, no. 7, pp. 1281–1298, 2011.
  12. T. Sattler, B. Leibe, and L. Kobbelt, “Improving image-based localization by active correspondence search,” in European conference on computer vision.   Springer, 2012, pp. 752–765.
  13. Y. Jin, D. Mishkin, A. Mishchuk, J. Matas, P. Fua, K. M. Yi, and E. Trulls, “Image matching across wide baselines: From paper to practice,” International Journal of Computer Vision, vol. 129, no. 2, pp. 517–547, 2021.
  14. K. M. Yi, E. Trulls, V. Lepetit, and P. Fua, “Lift: Learned invariant feature transform,” in European conference on computer vision.   Springer, 2016, pp. 467–483.
  15. Y. Ono, E. Trulls, P. Fua, and K. M. Yi, “Lf-net: Learning local features from images,” Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 31, 2018.
  16. D. DeTone, T. Malisiewicz, and A. Rabinovich, “Superpoint: Self-supervised interest point detection and description,” in Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition workshops, 2018, pp. 224–236.
  17. X. Li, K. Han, S. Li, and V. Prisacariu, “Dual-resolution correspondence networks,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 33, pp. 17 346–17 357, 2020.
  18. I. Rocco, R. Arandjelović, and J. Sivic, “Efficient neighbourhood consensus networks via submanifold sparse convolutions,” in European conference on computer vision.   Springer, 2020, pp. 605–621.
  19. I. Rocco, M. Cimpoi, R. Arandjelović, A. Torii, T. Pajdla, and J. Sivic, “Neighbourhood consensus networks,” Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 31, 2018.
  20. J. Sun, Z. Shen, Y. Wang, H. Bao, and X. Zhou, “Loftr: Detector-free local feature matching with transformers,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2021, pp. 8922–8931.
  21. Q. Wang, J. Zhang, K. Yang, K. Peng, and R. Stiefelhagen, “Matchformer: Interleaving attention in transformers for feature matching,” in Proceedings of the Asian Conference on Computer Vision, 2022, pp. 2746–2762.
  22. W. Jiang, E. Trulls, J. Hosang, A. Tagliasacchi, and K. M. Yi, “Cotr: Correspondence transformer for matching across images,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, 2021, pp. 6207–6217.
  23. H. Chen, Z. Luo, L. Zhou, Y. Tian, M. Zhen, T. Fang, D. McKinnon, Y. Tsin, and L. Quan, “Aspanformer: Detector-free image matching with adaptive span transformer,” in Computer Vision–ECCV 2022: 17th European Conference, Tel Aviv, Israel, October 23–27, 2022, Proceedings, Part XXXII.   Springer, 2022, pp. 20–36.
  24. A. Dosovitskiy, L. Beyer, A. Kolesnikov, D. Weissenborn, X. Zhai, T. Unterthiner, M. Dehghani, M. Minderer, G. Heigold, S. Gelly et al., “An image is worth 16x16 words: Transformers for image recognition at scale,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.11929, 2020.
  25. K. Dai, T. Xie, K. Wang, Z. Jiang, R. Li, and L. Zhao, “Oamatcher: An overlapping areas-based network for accurate local feature matching,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.05846, 2023.
  26. Q. Zhou, T. Sattler, and L. Leal-Taixe, “Patch2pix: Epipolar-guided pixel-level correspondences,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2021, pp. 4669–4678.
  27. Z. Li and N. Snavely, “Megadepth: Learning single-view depth prediction from internet photos,” in Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2018, pp. 2041–2050.
  28. D. M. Blei, A. Y. Ng, and M. I. Jordan, “Latent dirichlet allocation,” Journal of machine Learning research, vol. 3, no. Jan, pp. 993–1022, 2003.
  29. X. Yan, J. Guo, Y. Lan, and X. Cheng, “A biterm topic model for short texts,” in Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on World Wide Web, 2013, pp. 1445–1456.
  30. I. O. Tolstikhin, N. Houlsby, A. Kolesnikov, L. Beyer, X. Zhai, T. Unterthiner, J. Yung, A. Steiner, D. Keysers, J. Uszkoreit et al., “Mlp-mixer: An all-mlp architecture for vision,” Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 34, pp. 24 261–24 272, 2021.
  31. S. Tang, J. Zhang, S. Zhu, and P. Tan, “Quadtree attention for vision transformers,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2201.02767, 2022.
  32. K. Truong Giang, S. Song, and S. Jo, “Topicfm: Robust and interpretable topic-assisted feature matching,” Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 2447–2455, Jun. 2023. [Online]. Available: https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/AAAI/article/view/25341
  33. E. Rosten and T. Drummond, “Machine learning for high-speed corner detection,” in European conference on computer vision.   Springer, 2006, pp. 430–443.
  34. H. Noh, A. Araujo, J. Sim, T. Weyand, and B. Han, “Large-scale image retrieval with attentive deep local features,” in Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision, 2017, pp. 3456–3465.
  35. M. Dusmanu, I. Rocco, T. Pajdla, M. Pollefeys, J. Sivic, A. Torii, and T. Sattler, “D2-net: A trainable cnn for joint description and detection of local features,” in Proceedings of the ieee/cvf conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2019, pp. 8092–8101.
  36. J. Revaud, P. Weinzaepfel, C. De Souza, N. Pion, G. Csurka, Y. Cabon, and M. Humenberger, “R2d2: repeatable and reliable detector and descriptor,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1906.06195, 2019.
  37. A. Bhowmik, S. Gumhold, C. Rother, and E. Brachmann, “Reinforced feature points: Optimizing feature detection and description for a high-level task,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2020, pp. 4948–4957.
  38. M. Tyszkiewicz, P. Fua, and E. Trulls, “Disk: Learning local features with policy gradient,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 33, pp. 14 254–14 265, 2020.
  39. M. Muja and D. G. Lowe, “Scalable nearest neighbor algorithms for high dimensional data,” IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, vol. 36, no. 11, pp. 2227–2240, 2014.
  40. Z. Luo, T. Shen, L. Zhou, J. Zhang, Y. Yao, S. Li, T. Fang, and L. Quan, “Contextdesc: Local descriptor augmentation with cross-modality context,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2019, pp. 2527–2536.
  41. Z. Luo, L. Zhou, X. Bai, H. Chen, J. Zhang, Y. Yao, S. Li, T. Fang, and L. Quan, “Aslfeat: Learning local features of accurate shape and localization,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2020, pp. 6589–6598.
  42. P.-E. Sarlin, D. DeTone, T. Malisiewicz, and A. Rabinovich, “Superglue: Learning feature matching with graph neural networks,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2020, pp. 4938–4947.
  43. H. Chen, Z. Luo, J. Zhang, L. Zhou, X. Bai, Z. Hu, C.-L. Tai, and L. Quan, “Learning to match features with seeded graph matching network,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, 2021, pp. 6301–6310.
  44. Y. Shi, J.-X. Cai, Y. Shavit, T.-J. Mu, W. Feng, and K. Zhang, “Clustergnn: Cluster-based coarse-to-fine graph neural network for efficient feature matching,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2022, pp. 12 517–12 526.
  45. Z. Shen, M. Zhang, H. Zhao, S. Yi, and H. Li, “Efficient attention: Attention with linear complexities,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF winter conference on applications of computer vision, 2021, pp. 3531–3539.
  46. Q. Zhang, Y. N. Wu, and S.-C. Zhu, “Interpretable convolutional neural networks,” in Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2018, pp. 8827–8836.
  47. Q. Zhang, Y. Yang, H. Ma, and Y. N. Wu, “Interpreting cnns via decision trees,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2019, pp. 6261–6270.
  48. J. R. Williford, B. B. May, and J. Byrne, “Explainable face recognition,” in European conference on computer vision.   Springer, 2020, pp. 248–263.
  49. W. Zhao, Y. Rao, Z. Wang, J. Lu, and J. Zhou, “Towards interpretable deep metric learning with structural matching,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, 2021, pp. 9887–9896.
  50. Y. Chen, D. Huang, S. Xu, J. Liu, and Y. Liu, “Guide local feature matching by overlap estimation,” in Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 36, no. 1, 2022, pp. 365–373.
  51. Z. Liu, Y. Lin, Y. Cao, H. Hu, Y. Wei, Z. Zhang, S. Lin, and B. Guo, “Swin transformer: Hierarchical vision transformer using shifted windows,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, 2021, pp. 10 012–10 022.
  52. J. Yu, J. Chang, J. He, T. Zhang, J. Yu, and F. Wu, “Adaptive spot-guided transformer for consistent local feature matching,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2023, pp. 21 898–21 908.
  53. T.-Y. Lin, P. Dollár, R. Girshick, K. He, B. Hariharan, and S. Belongie, “Feature pyramid networks for object detection,” in Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2017, pp. 2117–2125.
  54. K. He, X. Zhang, S. Ren, and J. Sun, “Deep residual learning for image recognition,” in Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2016, pp. 770–778.
  55. J. Hu, L. Shen, and G. Sun, “Squeeze-and-excitation networks,” in 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2018, pp. 7132–7141.
  56. M. Cuturi, “Sinkhorn distances: Lightspeed computation of optimal transport,” Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 26, 2013.
  57. V. Balntas, K. Lenc, A. Vedaldi, and K. Mikolajczyk, “Hpatches: A benchmark and evaluation of handcrafted and learned local descriptors,” in Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2017, pp. 5173–5182.
  58. P. Truong, M. Danelljan, R. Timofte, and L. Van Gool, “Pdc-net+: Enhanced probabilistic dense correspondence network,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2023.
  59. M. Dusmanu, J. L. Schönberger, and M. Pollefeys, “Multi-view optimization of local feature geometry,” in Computer Vision–ECCV 2020: 16th European Conference, Glasgow, UK, August 23–28, 2020, Proceedings, Part I 16.   Springer, 2020, pp. 670–686.
  60. Z. Shen, J. Sun, Y. Wang, X. He, H. Bao, and X. Zhou, “Semi-dense feature matching with transformers and its applications in multiple-view geometry,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2022.
  61. E. Rublee, V. Rabaud, K. Konolige, and G. Bradski, “Orb: An efficient alternative to sift or surf,” in 2011 International conference on computer vision.   Ieee, 2011, pp. 2564–2571.
  62. J. Bian, W.-Y. Lin, Y. Matsushita, S.-K. Yeung, T.-D. Nguyen, and M.-M. Cheng, “Gms: Grid-based motion statistics for fast, ultra-robust feature correspondence,” in Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2017, pp. 4181–4190.
  63. J. Zhang, D. Sun, Z. Luo, A. Yao, L. Zhou, T. Shen, Y. Chen, L. Quan, and H. Liao, “Learning two-view correspondences and geometry using order-aware network,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, 2019, pp. 5845–5854.
  64. Z. Zhang, T. Sattler, and D. Scaramuzza, “Reference pose generation for long-term visual localization via learned features and view synthesis,” International Journal of Computer Vision, vol. 129, no. 4, pp. 821–844, 2021.
  65. H. Taira, M. Okutomi, T. Sattler, M. Cimpoi, M. Pollefeys, J. Sivic, T. Pajdla, and A. Torii, “Inloc: Indoor visual localization with dense matching and view synthesis,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2018, pp. 7199–7209.
  66. A. Dai, A. X. Chang, M. Savva, M. Halber, T. Funkhouser, and M. Nießner, “Scannet: Richly-annotated 3d reconstructions of indoor scenes,” in Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2017, pp. 5828–5839.
  67. T.-Y. Lin, M. Maire, S. Belongie, J. Hays, P. Perona, D. Ramanan, P. Dollár, and C. L. Zitnick, “Microsoft coco: Common objects in context,” in European conference on computer vision.   Springer, 2014, pp. 740–755.
  68. I. Melekhov, G. J. Brostow, J. Kannala, and D. Turmukhambetov, “Image stylization for robust features,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2008.06959, 2020.
  69. M. Humenberger, Y. Cabon, N. Guerin, J. Morat, J. Revaud, P. Rerole, N. Pion, C. de Souza, V. Leroy, and G. Csurka, “Robust image retrieval-based visual localization using kapture,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2007.13867, 2020.
Citations (2)

Summary

  • The paper introduces TopicFM+, a novel topic modeling approach that captures high-level semantic context for enhanced image feature matching.
  • It utilizes a pooling-and-merging attention module with an MLP-Mixer to achieve efficient feature extraction while cutting computational costs by 50%.
  • Extensive experiments show superior accuracy and efficiency compared to transformer-based methods like LoFTR and AspanFormer, highlighting its practical impact.

Essay on "TopicFM+: Boosting Accuracy and Efficiency of Topic-Assisted Feature Matching"

The paper "TopicFM+: Boosting Accuracy and Efficiency of Topic-Assisted Feature Matching" addresses the complex problem of image matching, particularly in challenging environments characterized by significant variation or limited texture. Traditional approaches in image matching, often reliant on convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and transformer architectures, grapple with high computational costs while attempting to encode global scene context. These existing methods also face challenges in scenarios like illumination variation and repetitive structures due to their limitations in discerning higher-level contextual information.

Key Contributions and Methodology

In this paper, the authors propose TopicFM+, an innovative approach that introduces a novel image-matching technique grounded in topic modeling. By conceptualizing each image as a multinomial distribution over latent semantic instances or topics, the method effectively captures comprehensive context information. These topics serve as repositories for high-level contextual information, offering a more discriminative basis for feature matching.

To condense the computational demands without compromising accuracy, TopicFM+ employs a pooling-and-merging attention module within its architecture. The design leverages fixed-sized topics and small-sized features during attention operations. This approach not only reduces computational overhead but also successfully identifies covisible regions by estimating overlapping topics between images.

The three principal components of the network architecture are:

  1. Feature Extraction: Utilizing a Feature Pyramid Network (FPN) to derive multi-scale feature maps.
  2. Coarse-Level Matching: Deployment of a pooling-and-merging attention network that aids in capturing and refining the contextual structure into latent topics.
  3. Fine-Level Matching: Utilization of a dynamic refinement network, incorporating an MLP-Mixer for efficient feature extraction, to improve the precision of feature correspondences identified.

Results and Analysis

Extensive experimentation demonstrates that TopicFM+ achieves superior accuracy in image matching tasks while maintaining a significant reduction in runtime and computational costs compared to other transformer-based methods, such as LoFTR and AspanFormer. The improved runtime efficiency is largely credited to the novel attention mechanism operations on reduced feature and topic sets. The paper reports a 50% reduction in computational costs, marking a notable advantage for applications with limited computational resources.

Furthermore, the paper highlights the interpretability of the proposed method. By providing insightful topic assignments to specific image regions, users gain a clear understanding of how topics contribute to the capture of semantic and structural information. This framework mirrors human cognitive strategies, emphasizing natural covisibility based on semantic cues across images.

Theoretical and Practical Implications

Beyond its implications for computational efficiency and accuracy, the approach explored in TopicFM+ opens up potential improvements in semantic understanding within computer vision applications. The paper adeptly demonstrates that leveraging topics can lead to robust and efficient representations, potentially influencing future developments in feature-matching methodologies and applications on resource-constrained devices. Additionally, the dynamic refinement network established in the fine-level matching phase points toward potential advancements in self-supervised learning frameworks for image processing tasks.

Conclusion

In summary, the research presented in this paper marks a notable advancement in the field of image matching, providing insights into balancing accuracy with computational efficiency through an innovative topic-assisted technique. By integrating high-level semantics through topics and deploying an efficient attention mechanism, TopicFM+ not only elevates performance benchmarks but also provides an avenue for future work in AI with real-world applications, from augmented reality to autonomous navigation systems. The research emphasized in this paper indicates a promising direction for future studies aimed at addressing the computational demands and semantic intricacies involved in image matching tasks.